| MercatorNet | May 31, 2017 |
‘Existential distress’, not pain, drives euthanasia
Euthanasia victims in Canada tend to be white and relatively affluent
The debate over euthanasia is often framed in terms of unbearable pain. Yet a new review of assisted dying cases in Toronto suggests that patients are primarily concerned about a “loss of control” over their lives, rather than refractory pain symptoms.
The study, published in the current edition of the New England Journal of Medicine, reviewed data on assisted dying cases from the University Hospital Network (UNH), an Ontario healthcare and medical research organisation that operates four major hospitals in the Toronto area.
According the researchers, the primary reason why UNH patients requested assisted dying was to relieve “existential distress”. The review states:
“Those who received MAiD tended to be white and relatively affluent and indicated that loss of autonomy was the primary reason for their request. Other common reasons included the wish to avoid burdening others or losing dignity and the intolerability of not being able to enjoy one’s life. Few patients cited inadequate control of pain or other symptoms.”
According to Madeline Li, the principal author of the study, patients primarily wanted control over how their lives will end: “Their quality of life is not what they want.” Li told the Washington Post. “They are mostly educated and affluent — people who are used to being successful and in control of their lives, and it’s how they want their death to be”.
Similar findings have been reported in studies of US and European data.
In a recent article in the Medical Journal of Australia, American bioethicist Ezekiel Emanuel argued that the presence of existential distress in assisted dying cases counts as a reason not to legalise euthanasia:
“What is then the great impetus to legalise interventions to end lives for a small minority of patients who are depressed, worried about losing autonomy and being tired of life? We should end the focus on the media frenzy about euthanasia and PAS as if it were the panacea to improving end-of-life care.”
Xavier Symons is deputy editor of BioEdge, from which this article has been republished.
“Now that you’re here … we’ve got a small favour to ask. More people are reading MercatorNet, but far fewer are donating. Unlike many online magazine, we haven’t put up a paywall and we don't have lots of obtrusive advertising. So you can see why we need to ask for your help.
MercatorNet’s independent, vibrant and informative articles take a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our views on human dignity matter – and because they might be your views as well.
If every fan of MercatorNet donated just $10, our future would be much more secure.
If every fan of MercatorNet donated just $10, our future would be much more secure.
| Donate Now |
May 31, 2017
There is one fact about euthanasia which ought to be front and centre in debates, wherever they take place. Nearly everyone who requests it is not suffering from unbearable pain.
As one of the leading bioethicists in the United States, Ezekiel Emanuel, points out, existential angst is the main reason. “We should end the focus on the media frenzy about euthanasia and PAS [physician-assisted suicide] as if it were the panacea to improving end-of-life care,” he says. And Dr Emanuel, the brother of President Obama’s one-time chief-of-staff, is not in the pro-life camp.
This finding has been confirmed again and again. As Xavier Symons reports in today’s issue of MercatorNet, most of the victims of Canada’s new euthanasia legislation are affluent and educated and dread losing their autonomy.
If euthanasia is “needed” because people are lonely and dependent, surely the solution is solidarity and companionship, rather than a lethal injection.
Michael Cook
Editor
MERCATORNET
| ‘Existential distress’, not pain, drives euthanasia By Xavier Symons Euthanasia victims in Canada tend to be white and relatively affluent Read the full article |  |
| Shock! Horror! Arghhhh! Overpopulation! By Marcus Roberts This discredited shibboleth won't die. Read the full article |  |
| Is passion all you need for a great career? By Barry Brownstein Every career path is littered with passionate but unsuccessful people Read the full article |  |
| Teenagers and the STD nobody is talking about By Meg Meeker Sex does more than physical harm to teens. Read the full article |  |
| Tiger, Tiger, who once burned bright By Michael Cook The shattered life of a golfing idol Read the full article |  |
| King Arthur returns—but without the magic By Sylvie Magerstaedt Every generation reshapes the legend of Camelot in its own image Read the full article |  |
| Our clichéd, spineless response to Manchester is the terrorists’ biggest victory By Laura Perrins 'They will never win'? Last Monday night they did win. Read the full article |  |
| How can we defend the right to think for ourselves? By Denyse O'Leary You need true grit and a thick skin Read the full article |  |
| ‘They killed her last night’ By Paul Russell Could euthanasia make a useful companion to elder abuse? Read the full article |  |
| Saving the galaxy again By Luisa Cotta Ramosino The madcap Marvel characters are back with an incoherent plot and lots of jokes Read the full article |
MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia
Designed by elleston
‘Existential distress’, not pain, drives euthanasia
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario