Comparative analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants of uncertain significance in patients with breast cancer: a multifactorial probability-based model versus ACMG standards and guidelines for interpreting sequence variants.

Park KS1, Cho EY2, Nam SJ3, Ki CS4, Kim JW4.

Author information

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To investigate variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in BRCA1 and BRCA2, we assessed the multifactorial posterior probability of VUS in BRCA1 and BRCA2 and compared these analyses with interpretations according to the recently released American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) standards and guidelines.

METHODS:

The analysis involved 715 Korean patients with breast cancer. The multifactorial probability of a VUS was analyzed using the prior probability and combined likelihoods of personal and family history, the pathologic profile of the breast cancer, and co-occurrence with pathogenic variants. Results were compared with those obtained according to the ACMG standards/guidelines.

RESULTS:

Sixteen VUS from 51 BRCA1 VUS carriers and 28 VUS from 62 BRCA2 VUS carriers were analyzed. There was a slight agreement between the two analyses, with a kappa value of 0.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.34 to 0.62) for the BRCA1 VUS and a kappa value of 0.17 (95% CI = -0.10 to 0.49) for the BRCA2 VUS.

CONCLUSION:

We propose that genetic counseling should be based on the concordant results between these two analyses. When discrepancies are found, those variants are still considered VUS and careful counseling should be provided.Genet Med advance online publication 28 April 2016Genetics in Medicine (2016); doi:10.1038/gim.2016.39.