martes, 10 de abril de 2018

Exploring the Feasibility and Utility of Exome-scale Tumour Sequencing in a Clinical Setting. - PubMed - NCBI

Exploring the Feasibility and Utility of Exome-scale Tumour Sequencing in a Clinical Setting. - PubMed - NCBI



 2018 Apr 1. doi: 10.1111/imj.13806. [Epub ahead of print]

Exploring the Feasibility and Utility of Exome-scale Tumour Sequencing in a Clinical Setting.

Lee B1,2,3,4,5Tran B3,4,5Hsu AL2,5Taylor GR2,5Fox SB1,2,5Fellowes A1,5Marquis R2,5Mooi J1,5Desai J1,3,6,5Doig K1,5Ekert P7,5Gaff C4,5Herath D6,5Hamilton A1,8,5James P3,5Roberts A3,4,5Snyder R9,5Waring P2,5McArthur G1,2,5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Technology has progressed from single gene panel to large-scale genomic sequencing. This is raising expectations from clinicians and patients alike. The utility and performance of this technology in a clinical setting needs to be evaluated.

AIM:

This pilot study investigated the feasibility of using exome-scale sequencing (ESS) to identify molecular drivers within cancers in real-time for Precision oncology in the clinic.

METHODS:

Between March 2014 and March 2015, the Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre Alliance explored the feasibility and utility of ESS in a pilot study. DNA extracted from the tumour specimens underwent both ESS and targeted "hotspot" sequencing (TS). Blood was taken for germline analysis. A multi-disciplinary molecular tumour board determined the clinical relevance of identified mutations; in particular, whether they were "actionable" and/or "druggable".

RESULTS:

Of 23 patients screened, 15 (65%) met the tissue requirements for genomic analysis. TS and ESS was successful in all cases. ESS identified pathogenic somatic variants in 73% (11/15 cases) versus 53% (8/15 cases) using TS. Clinically focussed ESS identified 63 variants, consisting of 30 somatic variants (including all 13 identified by TS) and 33 germline variants. Overall, there were 48 unique variants. ESS had a clinical impact in 53% (8/15 cases); 47% (7/15 cases) were referred to the familial cancer clinic, and "druggable" targets were identified in 53% (8/15 cases).

CONCLUSION:

Exome-scale sequencing of tumour DNA impacted clinical decision-making in 53%, with 20% more pathogenic variants identified through ES than TS. The identification of germline variants in 47% was an unexpected finding.

KEYWORDS:

Cancer; Clinical Genomics; Clinical Utility; Exome Sequencing; NGS; Precision Oncology

PMID:
 
29607586
 
DOI:
 
10.1111/imj.13806

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario