jueves, 19 de diciembre de 2019

Histopathological features of condylar hyperplasia and condylar Osteochondroma: a comparison study | Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Full Text

Histopathological features of condylar hyperplasia and condylar Osteochondroma: a comparison study | Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases | Full Text

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases



Histopathological features of condylar hyperplasia and condylar Osteochondroma: a comparison study

  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

Background

Both mandibular condylar hyperplasia and condylar osteochondroma can lead to maxillofacial skeletal asymmetry and malocclusion, although they exhibit different biological behavior. This study attempted to compare the histological features of mandibular condylar hyperplasia and condylar osteochondroma using hematoxylin-and-eosin (H&E) staining, and immunohistochemistry staining of PCNA and EXT1 with quantitative analysis method.

Results

The H&E staining showed that condylar hyperplasia and condylar osteochondroma could be divided into four histological types and exhibited features of different endochondral ossification stages. There was evidence of a thicker cartilage cap in condylar osteochondroma as compared condylar hyperplasia (P = 0.018). The percentage of bone formation in condylar osteochondroma was larger than was found in condylar hyperplasia (P = 0.04). Immunohistochemical staining showed that PCNA was mainly located in the undifferentiated mesenchymal layer and the hypertrophic cartilage layer, and there were more PCNA positive cells in the condylar osteochondroma (P = 0.007). EXT1 was mainly expressed in the cartilage layer, and there was also a higher positive rate of EXT1 in condylar osteochondroma (P = 0.0366). The thicker cartilage cap, higher bone formation rate and higher PCNA positive rate indicated a higher rate of proliferative activity in condylar osteochondroma. The more significant positive rate of EXT1 in condylar osteochondroma implied differential biological characteristic as compared to condylar hyperplasia.

Conclusions

These features might be useful in histopathologically distinguishing condylar hyperplasia and osteochondroma

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario