CIENCIASMEDICASNEWS: BioEdge: What’s in the IVF Petri dish?

sábado, 3 de septiembre de 2016

BioEdge: What’s in the IVF Petri dish?

What’s in the IVF Petri dish?

by Michael Cook | 3 Sep 2016 |

We know more about the ingredients of peanut butter than of IVF culture medium

With as many as one in 25 children being born through IVF in some countries, you would think that doctors understand the health risks perfectly. Not so.

A clutch of papers in the leading journal Human Reproduction points out that the Petri dishes in which IVF embryos spend the first days of their lives are filled with mysterious fluids made up of unknown ingredients. And the composition of these laboratory cultures affects the birthweight of the resulting babies – and possibly their long-term health.

In a blistering editorial, Hans Evers, the journal’s editor, writes that he knows far more about the ingredients in his favourite peanut butter, from the ingredients to the production record, than he does about embryo culture media.

“It’s not possible to sell a single drug on the market if you do not give the total composition of the drug, but for such an important thing as culture media, that envelopes the whole embryo, you can sell it without revealing its contents. For me, that’s unacceptable,” Evers told New Scientist. “Compared to the rest of medicine, this is such a backward area. We can’t accept it any longer.”

In one paper, Dutch scientists conducted a random controlled trial of two types of IVF culture media. They found a clear correlation between the media and low birthweight. “This means that we should be careful and we should no longer blindly accept new culture media, or other alterations in laboratory or clinical procedures, without first rigorously studying effectiveness and safety," the scientists wrote.

In the other paper, a working group of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, led by Professor Arne Sunde, from the University Hospital in Trondheim, Norway, found that culture media vary widely, their composition is usually unknown by the end users (the embryologists, clinicians and patients), and data about the influence of the media on outcomes are conflicting.

“We have no information about long-term consequences of this, but we cannot rule out that the composition of the culture media may affect the health of children as they grow up and become adults," says Dr Sunde.

Hovering over these reports about the early development of babies is “the Barker Hypothesis”. This suggests that the fortunes of the developing embryo can cause not only low birthweight but also obesity, dementia, hypertension, coronary heart disease, and diabetes, in middle age. It stems from observations of the health of Dutch children conceived and born during a severe five-month-long famine in the German-occupied part of the Netherlands in the winter of 1944 to 1945. It was a perfect experiment – albeit a tragic one – in the effect of the gestation on adult health.

With that in mind, conscientious doctors and scientists worry about what might happen to IVF children when they reach middle age. Will there be an epidemic of chronic disease?

- See more at: http://www.bioedge.org/bioethics/whats-in-the-ivf-petri-dish/11983#sthash.Xot2MBav.dpuf

Bioedge

From an ethical point of view, IVF is made of teflon. Just about nothing sticks. It's understandable, since its product line is the joyful experience of cradling a newborn baby. However, there have always been some dark clouds hanging over IVF. What works always seems to have trumped what's safe. But clinicians are beginning to realise that some IVF techniques could be responsible for serious health problems for IVF children decades later.

As we report below, the editor of the leading journal Human Reproduction warns that changes are needed. “It’s not possible to sell a single drug on the market if you do not give the total composition of the drug, but for such an important thing as culture media, that envelopes the whole embryo, you can sell it without revealing its contents. For me, that’s unacceptable,” he says. “Compared to the rest of medicine, this is such a backward area. We can’t accept it any longer.”