Volume 26, Number 1—January 2020
Research Letter
Emergence of Vibrio cholerae O1 Sequence Type 75 in Taiwan
On This Page
Tables
Article Metrics
Yueh-Hua Tu, Bo-Han Chen, Yu-Ping Hong, Ying-Shu Liao, Yi-Syong Chen, Yen-Yi Liu, Ru-Hsiou Teng, You-Wun Wang, and Chien-Shun Chiou
Abstract
We investigated the epidemiology of cholera in Taiwan during 2002–2018. Vibrio cholerae sequence type (ST) 75 clone emerged in 2009 and has since become more prevalent than the ST69 clone from a previous pandemic. Closely related ST75 strains have emerged in 4 countries and may now be widespread in Asia.
Cholera, an acute diarrheal disease caused by the toxigenic Vibrio cholerae serogroup O1 and its derivative serogroup O139, remains a severe public health threat in some regions of the world (1). Seven cholera pandemics have occurred in the past 200 years; the most recent, caused primarily by a sequence type (ST) 69 V. cholerae clone, originated in Indonesia in 1961 and remains ongoing (2,3). In Taiwan, cholera appeared in 1962 and resulted in 383 cases and 24 deaths during a 3-month outbreak (4). Cholera has been rare in Taiwan since the 1962 outbreak; however, incidence has increased in recent years. The average number of cholera cases increased from 1.5 cases/year in 1991–2008 to 5.5 cases/year in 2009–2018 (5).
For this study, we investigated the epidemiology of cholera in Taiwan for 2002–2018 and the source of V. cholerae strains in those cases. During 2002–2018, Taiwan reported 63 total cholera cases, ranging from 0 to 10 cases per year (Table). Among the patients, 62 were from Taiwan and 1 from Japan; 35 (55.6%) were male. Three (4.8%) patients were in the <14 year age range, 37 (58.7%) in the 15–64 age range, and 23 (36.5%) in the >65 age range. Nearly all cases, 61, were sporadic; 2 were part of a family cluster. Seven patients had traveled within the incubation period (5 days) before onset of symptoms: 2 to Indonesia, 1 to Malaysia, 1 to Thailand, 2 to the Philippines, and 1 to Vietnam.
Using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and whole-genome sequencing analysis, we characterized 60 V. cholerae isolates: 4 recovered from patients of the 1962 cholera outbreak and 56 recovered from patients during 2002–2018. Using PFGE, the 2 most prevalent isolates we identified were VcN09.014 (n = 25) and VcN09.012 (n = 7) (Appendix Figure 1). We compared those PFGE patterns with those in the Vibrio cholerae database maintained by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2016 and found no match for VcN09.014, but we did find 11 isolates from Guam and the Philippines that matched with VcN09.012 (identification no. KZGN11.0102).
We identified 7 ST types for the 60 isolates: ST69 (18 isolates), ST723 (2 isolates), ST75 (35 isolates), ST725 (1 isolate), ST726 (2 isolates), ST727 (1 isolate), and ST728 (1 isolate). ST725, ST726, and ST728 are single-locus variants and ST727 a double-locus variant of ST75. ST75 and its derivatives first appeared in 2009 and subsequently become the most prevalent types (Table). Among the 7 patients who had traveled abroad, we found ST69 in those returning from Thailand, the Philippines, and Malaysia; ST75 in the person returning from Vietnam; and ST723 in those returning from Indonesia. We performed cluster analyses on whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism profiles for the 60 isolates, which revealed 4 distinct clades (Appendix Table, Figure 2). The fact that a total of 5 isolates in clades 2 and 3 did not harbor the quinolone-resistant gene qnrVC4 suggests that the resistance gene was introduced after the ST75 strains had emerged.
We compared core genome multilocus sequence typing profiles of the 60 isolates with 5,048 genomes in the National Center for Biotechnology Information databases as of January 19, 2019. We found that the 38 isolates in clade 2 were closely related to 10 strains from China (6), strain MS6 that was identified in Thailand in 2008 (7), and a UK strain recovered from a traveler who returned from Thailand in 2017 (8) (Appendix Figure 3). Strains from the 2 isolates in clade 3 were distantly removed from strains in clade 2 and those found near the US Gulf Coast (9,10) but more closely related to a strain recovered in 2018 and another strain from Russia. The ST75 strains from China were recovered from well water, carriers, and patients during 2005–2014 (6). One ST75 strain in clade 2 was obtained from a Taiwanese person who returned from Vietnam in 2015.
In summary, for most of recent history, cholera has been rare and primarily sporadic in Taiwan. However, the per-year rate of cholera cases has increased since 2009, concurrent with the emergence of strains of the ST75 clone. Over this time, ST75 strains have replaced ST69 as the most prevalent causative agent of cholera in Taiwan. Because closely related ST75 strains had been identified earlier in China and 2 other Southeast Asia countries, we believe our findings indicate that the ST75 clone is spreading more widely in Asia.
Mr. Tu is a research associate in the Centers for Disease Control, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan. His expertise includes systems biology, computational biology, and machine learning, including developing Vibro cholerae core genome multilocus sequence typing profiling pipelines for the organization.
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank Peter Gerner-Smidt and his colleagues at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for conducting PFGE pattern similarity searching in the US PFGE National Database; Marie Anne Chattaway of Public Health England in the United Kingdom and Kazuhisa Okada of Osaka University in Japan for providing the historical information of the V. cholerae ST75 strains they studied; and our colleagues in the Biobank Section of Taiwan Centers for Disease Control for providing V. cholerae isolates.
This study was funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan (grant no. MOHW108-CDC-C-315-122129).
References
- World Health Organization. Cholera Annual Report 2017. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2018;93:489–500.
- Mutreja A, Kim DW, Thomson NR, Connor TR, Lee JH, Kariuki S, et al. Evidence for several waves of global transmission in the seventh cholera pandemic. Nature. 2011;477:462–5.
- Lippi D, Gotuzzo E, Caini S. Cholera. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4.
- Yen CH. A recent study of cholera with reference to an outbreak in Taiwan in 1962. Bull World Health Organ. 1964;30:811–25.
- Taiwan National Infectious Disease Statistics System [cited 2019 Feb 1].
- Luo Y, Octavia S, Jin D, Ye J, Miao Z, Jiang T, et al. US Gulf-like toxigenic O1 Vibrio cholerae causing sporadic cholera outbreaks in China. J Infect. 2016;72:564–72.
- Okada K, Na-Ubol M, Natakuathung W, Roobthaisong A, Maruyama F, Nakagawa I, et al. Comparative genomic characterization of a Thailand-Myanmar isolate, MS6, of Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor, which is phylogenetically related to a “US Gulf Coast” clone. PLoS One. 2014;9:
e98120 . - Greig DR, Schaefer U, Octavia S, Hunter E, Chattaway MA, Dallman TJ, et al. Evaluation of whole-genome sequencing for identification and typing of Vibrio cholerae. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e00831–18.
- Watve SS, Chande AT, Rishishwar L, Mariño-Ramírez L, Jordan IK, Hammer BK. Whole-genome sequences of 26 Vibrio cholerae isolates. Genome Announc. 2016;4:e01396–16.
- Kaper JB, Bradford HB, Roberts NC, Falkow S. Molecular epidemiology of Vibrio cholerae in the U.S. Gulf Coast. J Clin Microbiol. 1982;16:129–34.
Table
Cite This ArticleOriginal Publication Date: 12/10/2019
.png)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario