domingo, 26 de junio de 2016

BioEdge: Getting down and dirty with bioethics

BioEdge: Getting down and dirty with bioethics

Bioedge

Getting down and dirty with bioethics
     


In its most expansive mode, bioethics deals with the biosphere, our responsibility for all living things. It is a bold writer who tackles this, which helps to explain why the purview of most bioethicists is humankind. Animals usually get short shrift.

However Charles Foster, barrister, travel writer, veterinarian, theologian, Oxford don, father of six and medical ethicist has published a fascinating, if sometimes stomach-turning, account of his attempt to reconnect with the animal world.

In his recent book Being a Beast, he tells how he lived as a badger, a fox, a swift and an otter. “Lived as” means “lived as”. Badger Foster lived underground, ate earthworms, scraped squirrel road kill off the tarmac and ate it with his 8-year-old son (cooked with wood sorrel and wild garlic, mind you). Fox Foster lived in London like urban foxes, scurrying down laneways and eating rancid pizzas.

Otters were his least favourite animal. They are pitiless killing and eating machines, consuming the equivalent of 88 Big Macs a day. A human counterpart would “stay up for a couple of nights, drinking a double espresso every couple of hours, before having a cold bath followed by a huge breakfast of still-twitching sushi and then a nap, and then keep repeating until I die.”

The lesson of the book, which is being praised as both bonkers and brilliant, is that humans need to engage with the natural world. In its own eccentric way, it is a serious and profound book:

“I’m angry at humans who act towards the natural world with a lack of empathy which, if displayed towards other humans, would be seen as frankly psychopathic. We have this ability to engage the natural world on so many more levels than we actually do. I’m incredibly happy being a human being, but I’m much happier having learned the lessons about being human that these other species have taught me.”
Even human beings cannot escape from their wilderness heritage: it is wired into their psyche through evolution. As a Cambridge graduate, he ought to know. Here is what his classmates were told at graduation:

“You’re about to leave Cambridge, gentlemen. Now, it may very well be true that the meek will inherit the earth, but my advice to you is this: Until they show some signs of making a serious bid for that position, trample all over them.”
Now, presumably, the mature Foster regards this as otter bosh.
- See more at: http://www.bioedge.org/bioethics/getting-down-and-dirty-with-bioethics/11940#sthash.yqtz9XxE.dpuf

Bioedge

Bioedge



What does Brexit mean for bioethics?” is our lead story today. Given that the Leavers were not expected to win and that the pundits have widely different views of the future of the politics and economies of the UK and the EU, it is unwise to be dogmatic on the issue.
However, the question highlights the importance of Britain in the world of bioethics. Britain is the home of utilitarianism, which is the dominant philosophy in bioethical discourse at the moment. The medical and scientific establishment is dominated by a utilitarian mindset which has set the agenda for debates on embryo research, stem cell research and assisted dying around the world. As one cynical writer commented, “when it comes to bioethics, Europe might be better off without Britain”.
There is something in this. Although I am handicapped by a big language barrier, my impression is that from Norway to Italy there is much more depth and diversity in bioethical discourse across the Channel. The Greens and the Christian Churches are much more influential, to say nothing of Continental philosophy, which despises utilitarianism as vacuous and naïve. If England (the pundits all agree that Scotland will secede) loses its biomedical industry to the EU, perhaps utilitarian bioethics will lose some of its funding and its influence. That would be no bad thing, I think.
******
Sorry, guys, but BioEdge will be taking a holiday during July. Our next issue will be in the first week of August. 


Michael Cook
Editor
BioEdge

This week in BioEdge

by Xavier Symons | Jun 25, 2016
Brexit may lead to significant changes in biomedical policy in the UK

by Michael Cook | Jun 25, 2016
Oxford don tries living as a badger to expand his horizons

by Michael Cook | Jun 25, 2016
Fails to surface in the media

by Xavier Symons | Jun 25, 2016
Australia’s asylum seeker policies have been subject to intense international scrutiny – even in the world of bioethics.

by Michael Cook | Jun 25, 2016
Getting in touch with your inner earth mother goddess

by Xavier Symons | Jun 25, 2016
A new UK Parliamentary Inquiry into conscientious objection was launched this month.

by Xavier Symons | Jun 25, 2016
The American tabloid media was abuzz this week with news that a New York Mathematics Professor had fathered 22 children through informal sperm donation.

by Michael Cook | Jun 25, 2016
A practical application of utilitarian theory spurned by the public

by Michael Cook | Jun 25, 2016
Confusing signals from China over stem cells and organ transplants

by Wesley J. Smith | Jun 21, 2016
A leading voice in American bioethics peers into the future in his new book
BioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
New Media Foundation | Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605

BioEdge: Getting down and dirty with bioethics

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario