Cancer Patients' Views and Understanding of Genome Sequencing: A Qualitative Study
Affiliations
- PMID: 31980566
- DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106410
Abstract
Background: Little is known about knowledge of, and attitudes towards, genome sequencing (GS) among individuals with a personal history of cancer who decide to undergo GS. This qualitative study aimed to investigate baseline knowledge and attitudes among individuals previously diagnosed with a cancer of likely genetic origin who have consented to GS.
Methods: Semistructured interviews were conducted with purposively selected participants (n=20) from the longitudinal Psychosocial Issues in Genomic Oncology study, within a month of consenting to GS and prior to receiving any results. Participants were adults with a cancer of likely genetic aetiology who are undertaking GS as part of a larger genetic study.
Results: Analysis identified three main themes: limited understanding of genomics; multifactorial motivation; and complex decision making. While motivations such as obtaining health information about self and family appear to be the main drivers for undertaking GS, these motivations are sometimes based on limited knowledge of the accuracy and utility of GS, creating unrealistic expectations. This in turn can prolong the deliberation process and lead to ongoing decisional conflict.
Conclusion: Understanding the degree and nature of patient understanding of GS, as well as their attitudes and decision-making processes, will enable healthcare professionals to better manage patient expectations and appropriately engage and support patients to make an informed decision when pursuing GS.
Keywords: cancer; genome sequencing; patient attitudes; psychosocial; qualitative.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: BM has a remunerated consultant role with the company Astrazeneca with respect to an unrelated project. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
- The PiGeOn Project: Protocol of a Longitudinal Study Examining Psychosocial and Ethical Issues and Outcomes in Germline Genomic Sequencing for CancerM Best et al. BMC Cancer 18 (1), 454. PMID 29685123.This will be one of the first studies internationally to follow the psychosocial impact on probands and their blood relatives who undergo germline genome sequencing, over …
- A Qualitative Systematic Review of Internal and External Influences on Shared Decision-Making in All Health Care SettingsM Truglio-Londrigan et al. JBI Libr Syst Rev 10 (58), 4633-4646. PMID 27820528.The objective of this review is to identify and synthesize the best available evidence related to the meaningfulness of internal and external influences on shared-decisio …
- The PiGeOn Project: Protocol for a Longitudinal Study Examining Psychosocial, Behavioural and Ethical Issues and Outcomes in Cancer Tumour Genomic ProfilingM Best et al. BMC Cancer 18 (1), 389. PMID 29621994.Not required for this sub-study, parent trial registration ACTRN12616000908437 .
- The Expectations and Attitudes of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Toward Living Kidney Donor Transplantation: A Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative StudiesCS Hanson et al. Transplantation 99 (3), 540-54. PMID 25463967. - ReviewEnhanced education and psychosocial support may help clarify, validate, and address patients' concerns regarding donor outcomes, guilt, relationship tensions, and donor r …
- What Factors Hinder the Decision-Making Process for Women With Cancer and Contemplating Fertility Preservation Treatment?G Jones et al. Hum Reprod Update 23 (4), 433-457. PMID 28510760. - ReviewThis review has found that a wide range of internal and external factors impact the FP decision-making process. Key external issues related to current service delivery su …
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario