martes, 21 de mayo de 2019

Sarcoptic Mange of Fox Origin in Multiple Farm Animals and Scabies in Humans, Switzerland, 2018 - Volume 25, Number 6—June 2019 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Sarcoptic Mange of Fox Origin in Multiple Farm Animals and Scabies in Humans, Switzerland, 2018 - Volume 25, Number 6—June 2019 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Issue Cover for Volume 25, Number 6—June 2019



Volume 25, Number 6—June 2019
Research Letter

Sarcoptic Mange of Fox Origin in Multiple Farm Animals and Scabies in Humans, Switzerland, 2018

Simone R.R. Pisano, Marie-Pierre Ryser-Degiorgis, Luca Rossi, Andrea Peano, Karin Keckeis, and Petra RoosjeComments to Author 
Author affiliations: University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (S.R.R. Pisano, M.-P. Ryser-Degiorgis, P. Roosje)University of Turin, Grugliasco, Italy (L. Rossi, A. Peano)consulting veterinarian, Wabern, Switzerland (K. Keckeis)

Abstract

Fox-derived Sarcoptes scabiei mites caused an outbreak of mange on a farm in Switzerland in 2018. Pruritic skin lesions suggestive of S. scabiei mite infestation developed in 4 humans who had direct contact with affected farm animals but not foxes. Sarcoptic mange is continuously spreading; such outbreaks affecting humans could start occurring more frequently.
The Sarcoptes scabiei mite is the causative agent of scabies in humans and sarcoptic mange in animals (1). Scabies is considered a neglected reemerging disease of public health concern (2). Sarcoptic mange causes distress in livestock, economic loss in the livestock industry, and disease and death in wildlife (3). The degrees of host specificity and cross-infectivity of S. scabiei mites are still debated (3).
Thumbnail of Clinical and molecular characterization of an outbreak of fox-derived Sarcoptes scabiei mites in multiple mammal species on a farm in Switzerland, 2018. A) Outbreak timeline displaying animal species (pigs [Sus scrofa domesticus], oxen [Bos taurus], dogs [Canis lupus familiaris], goats [Capra hircus], horses [Equus caballus], and red foxes [Vulpes vulpes]) showing clinical signs compatible with sarcoptic mange and humans with signs of zoonotic scabies in order of appearance. Gray po
Figure. Clinical and molecular characterization of an outbreak of fox-derived Sarcoptes scabiei mites in multiple mammal species on a farm in Switzerland, 2018. A) Outbreak timeline displaying animal species (pigs [Sus scrofa...
In January 2018, sarcoptic mange was suspected on a farm in the Jura Mountains, Switzerland. The outdoor loose housing system of this farm hosting 2 oxen (Bos taurus), 2 horses (Equus caballus), 5 goats (Capra hircus), 4 alpacas (Vicugna pacos), 8 fallow deer (Dama dama), and 15 sheep (Ovis aries) was separated from a stable housing 3 pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus). Six dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) and 17 cats (Felis catus) had access to all stables. Pruritic skin lesions developed in several species 2–3 weeks after repeated episodes of mangy red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) sleeping in the stables and making partial body contact with the livestock (Figure, panels A, B). Pruritic skin lesions also developed in 4 persons who had direct contact with the domestic animals but not the foxes. A fox with mange was found dead nearby and a necropsy was performed. Oxen, dogs, and pigs were treated with avermectins before diagnostic investigations were carried out.
Clinical examination revealed papules, erythema, excoriations, hyperkeratosis, and hypotrichosis with variable severity in 2 pigs, 2 goats, 2 dogs, all horses, and all oxen (Figure, panels C, D). The 3 sheep and 1 cat examined did not have lesions suggestive of mange. Close examination of the fallow deer and alpacas was impracticable. Humans had pruritic erythematous papules and excoriations on their neck, legs, or arms (Figure, panel E). Health authorities temporarily prohibited 1 affected person (a teenager) from attending school because of suspected scabies. Pruritus and skin lesions disappeared in the affected animals and humans within 6 weeks after >2 treatments with avermectins, topical neem oil, or both.
We identified S. scabiei mites by light microscopy in the skin scrapings from 2 pigs, 1 horse, 1 ox, 1 goat, and 1 fox but none of the scrapings from 3 sheep, 5 dogs, and 1 cat sampled. A few mites but no eggs, eggshells, or gravid females were observed on livestock, whereas all stages were present and numerous on the fox. Skin scrapings were not obtained from the affected humans. We confirmed S. scabiei mite mitochondrial 16S rDNA by TaqMan real-time PCR (4) in the sampled horse, ox, goat, and fox but not in the sampled sheep, cat, dogs, or pigs. Analyses with a panel of 9 microsatellites (sarms 33, 35–38, 40, 41, 44, and 45) (5) confirmed that foxes were the source of the mites (Figure, panel F); the mites on the outbreak farm were similar to each other and to mites previously collected from foxes in Switzerland (6) but different from those collected from wild ungulates in Spain, Switzerland, France, and Italy (5,7,8).
Genetic investigations suggest that multiple S. scabiei mite subpopulations can infect the same host and that mite subpopulations can differ from host to host. Different subpopulations undergo varying degrees of gene flow depending on the geographic distances among infested hosts and cluster in animals that share a taxonomic classification above the species level (1,9). In Europe, wildlife herbivore-, carnivore- and omnivore-derived S. scabiei mites have been described as distinct groups, and intraspecies and interspecies transmission have been proposed to occur among hosts of the same taxon but not among different taxa under natural conditions (8). However, prey-to-predator transmission was demonstrated in Africa (10). Thus, direct contact between affected hosts or fomites and susceptible hosts (1) rather than mite host specificity might determine whether S. scabiei mites are transmitted to different taxonomic groups.
Our investigation unambiguously identified wild carnivore–derived S. scabiei mites as the cause of a point-like outbreak involving different domestic herbivores and omnivores. However, we found no evidence of mite reproduction, which suggests that the mites that transmitted from foxes to other species were not able to actively replicate. Yet, persistence of clinical signs despite treatment and suspected subsequent transmission from domestic animals to humans is not fully consistent with the self-limiting pattern described for zoonotic scabies, although reinfection of domestic animals by other foxes with mange could have occurred.
Increased fox abundance, reemergence, and continuous spread of sarcoptic mange in foxes could lead to its emergence in other wild and domestic animal species. Although mites or their DNA could not be demonstrated in the affected humans, their clinical signs were highly suggestive of scabies, highlighting the zoonotic potential of S. scabiei mites. The propensity of foxes with mange to live close to human settlements, the increase in green farming, and increased density and size of domestic animal populations augment the risk for contacts between foxes, domestic animals, and humans. Therefore, such outbreaks might become more frequent in the future.
Mr. Pisano is a veterinary resident in the Wildlife Population Health specialty of the European College of Zoological Medicine at the Centre for Fish and Wildlife Health, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. He has a special interest in infectious diseases in free-ranging wildlife and researches various aspects of sarcoptic mange in Swiss wildlife.

Acknowledgment

We thank the owners of the animal refuge, Tante Martha, and the game warden, Thierry Studer, for their contributions to sample collection.

References

  1. Arlian  LGMorgan  MSA review of Sarcoptes scabiei: past, present and future. Parasit Vectors2017;10:297DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  2. Karimkhani  CColombara  DVDrucker  AMNorton  SAHay  REngelman  Det al. The global burden of scabies: a cross-sectional analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet Infect Dis2017;17:124754DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  3. Fraser  TACharleston  MMartin  APolkinghorne  ACarver  SThe emergence of sarcoptic mange in Australian wildlife: an unresolved debate. Parasit Vectors2016;9:316DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  4. Angelone-Alasaad  SMolinar Min  APasquetti  MAlagaili  AND’Amelio  SBerrilli  Fet al. Universal conventional and real-time PCR diagnosis tools for Sarcoptes scabiei. [published erratum in Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:622]Parasit Vectors2015;8:587DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  5. Alasaad  SOleaga  ÁCasais  RRossi  LMin  AMSoriguer  RCet al. Temporal stability in the genetic structure of Sarcoptes scabieiunder the host-taxon law: empirical evidences from wildlife-derived Sarcoptes mite in Asturias, Spain. Parasit Vectors2011;4:151DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  6. Nimmervoll  HHoby  SRobert  NLommano  EWelle  MRyser-Degiorgis  MPPathology of sarcoptic mange in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes): macroscopic and histologic characterization of three disease stages. J Wildl Dis2013;49:91102DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  7. Haas  COriggi  FCRossi  SLópez-Olvera  JRRossi  LCastillo-Contreras  Ret al. Serological survey in wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Switzerland and other European countries: Sarcoptes scabiei may be more widely distributed than previously thought. BMC Vet Res2018;14:117DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  8. Rasero  RRossi  LSoglia  DMaione  SSacchi  PRambozzi  Let al. Host taxon-derived Sarcoptes mite in European wild animals revealed by microsatellite markers. Biol Conserv2010;143:126977DOIExternal Link
  9. Andriantsoanirina  VAriey  FIzri  ABernigaud  CFang  FCharrel  Ret al. Sarcoptes scabiei mites in humans are distributed into three genetically distinct clades. Clin Microbiol Infect2015;21:110714DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  10. Gakuya  FRossi  LOmbui  JMaingi  NMuchemi  GOgara  Wet al. The curse of the prey: Sarcoptes mite molecular analysis reveals potential prey-to-predator parasitic infestation in wild animals from Masai Mara, Kenya. Parasit Vectors2011;4:193DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
Figure
Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2506.181891
Original Publication Date: 5/3/2019

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario