sábado, 6 de octubre de 2018

Notes from the Field: Spatially Associated Coincident and Noncoincident Cases of La Crosse Encephalitis — North Carolina, 2002–2017 | MMWR

Notes from the Field: Spatially Associated Coincident and Noncoincident Cases of La Crosse Encephalitis — North Carolina, 2002–2017 | MMWR

MMWR Logo

MMWR Weekly
Vol. 67, No. 39
October 05, 2018



Notes from the Field: Spatially Associated Coincident and Noncoincident Cases of La Crosse Encephalitis — North Carolina, 2002–2017



Brian D. Byrd, PhD1; Carl J. Williams, DVM2; J. Erin Staples, MD, PhD3; Kristen L. Burkhalter3; Harry M. Savage, PhD3; Michael S. Doyle, MS2 (View author affiliations)
View suggested citation
La Crosse virus (LACV) is the most common cause of pediatric arthropod-borne viral (arboviral) encephalitis in the United States (1). It is a California serogroup bunyavirus primarily transmitted by the eastern tree-hole mosquito (Aedes triseriatus) (2). LACV encephalitis is a reportable condition in North Carolina and is a nationally notifiable disease. In North Carolina, LACV encephalitis is the most common endemic arboviral disease reported in humans, with seven western counties accounting for approximately 80% of confirmed cases since 2003 (3). The fatality rate for LACV encephalitis is <1%, with most patients recovering without overt clinical sequelae; however, long-term neurologic sequelae reported in some patients include recurrent seizures, hemiparesis, and cognitive and neurobehavioral abnormalities (4).
In August 2017, the North Carolina Department of Public Health (NCDPH) was notified of a suspected LACV encephalitis case in a boy aged 2 years from western North Carolina. The following day, NCDPH was notified that the patient’s brother, aged 11 years, was also ill with symptoms consistent with viral meningoencephalitis. Laboratory testing confirmed that both siblings had evidence of recent LACV infection (Table).
An interagency environmental assessment team who visited the siblings’ residence identified multiple risk factors associated with increased risk for LACV transmission (5). Water-filled artificial containers containing Aedes mosquito larvae (Ae. triseriatusAe. albopictus, and Ae. japonicus) were found on the premises, multiple windows and doors lacked effective screens, and the yard was within close proximity (<50 m) to a mixed hardwood forest. Additional mosquito samples (adult mosquitoes collected by large-bore aspirator and mosquitoes reared from eggs collected by ovitraps) were obtained; mosquitoes from egg collections were tested for LACV infection by real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (6) and adult mosquitoes were tested by virus isolation attempts in cell culture; no virus was detected (7). The sibling pair was known to play outdoors daily and received mosquito bites during the expected incubation period (5–15 days) before disease onset.
To identify additional LACV patients among two or more persons residing at the same location, 331 confirmed or probable LACV case reports meeting the case definition* were reviewed in the North Carolina Electronic Disease Surveillance System. Three additional coincident patient pairs (two sibling pairs and one caregiver/child pair), linked spatially by place of residence and occurring during the same or sequential epidemiologic weeks, were identified (Table). In addition, three instances of confirmed LACV encephalitis were identified in children residing at the same residence, but during different years (spatially linked noncoincident cases). In one instance, the patients had no familial relationship but were linked by residence (residence F) after a change in home ownership. Three additional cases (one coincident sibling pair and one noncoincident case) were linked by residence within the same multibuilding apartment cluster (residence C).
These identified cases indicate that LACV disease risk can occur coincidently or noncoincidentally in time in persons at the same physical residence and further support surveillance data indicating that the disease is highly focal, occurring in a limited geographic area (8). This finding suggests that environmental assessments and modifications (e.g., filling tree holes, installing and repairing window or door screens, and removing water-filled containers) at locations where cases occur could help reduce the risk for this disease. In addition, persons living at the residence of a patient with a newly identified case of LACV disease or in an area where the virus is known to occur should be advised of the risk and measures to reduce risk, such as using Environmental Protection Agency–registered and recommended insect repellents, reducing time outdoors when mosquitoes are active, appropriate environmental modifications, and wearing clothing that prevents mosquito bites. Finally, health care providers should be aware of the potential clustering of LACV disease at a specific location and routinely advise their patients about mosquito prevention measures they can take to lower their risk. Additional information about LACV is available at https://www.cdc.gov/lac/index.html.
 Top

Acknowledgments

Arbovirus Diagnostic Laboratory staff members, Jennifer Lehman, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC; Felissa Vazquez, Sue Ellen Morrison, Buncombe County Health Department, Asheville, North Carolina; David Buhner, Mission Health System, Asheville, North Carolina.
 Top
Corresponding author: Brian D. Byrd, bdbyrd@wcu.edu, 828-227-2607.
 Top

1Environmental Health Sciences Program, Western Carolina University, Cullowhee, North Carolina, 2North Carolina Division of Public Health, Raleigh, North Carolina, 3Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC.
 Top
All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
 Top


 Top

References

  1. Gaensbauer JT, Lindsey NP, Messacar K, Staples JE, Fischer M. Neuroinvasive arboviral disease in the United States: 2003 to 2012. Pediatrics 2014;134:e642–50. CrossRef PubMed
  2. Westby KM, Fritzen C, Paulsen D, Poindexter S, Moncayo AC. La Crosse encephalitis virus infection in field-collected Aedes albopictus, Aedes japonicus, and Aedes triseriatus in Tennessee. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 2015;31:233–41. CrossRef PubMed
  3. CDC. ArboNET disease maps. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2018. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/arbonet/maps/ADB_Diseases_Map/index.html
  4. CDC. Symptoms and treatment: La Crosse encephalitis. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/lac/tech/symptoms.html
  5. Erwin PC, Jones TF, Gerhardt RR, et al. La Crosse encephalitis in eastern Tennessee: clinical, environmental, and entomological characteristics from a blinded cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 2002;155:1060–5. CrossRef PubMed
  6. Lambert AJ, Nasci RS, Cropp BC, et al. Nucleic acid amplification assays for detection of La Crosse virus RNA. J Clin Microbiol 2005;43:1885–9. CrossRef PubMed
  7. Beaty BJ, Calisher CH, Shope RE. Arboviruses. In: Lennette EH, Lennette DA, eds. Diagnostic procedures for viral, rickettsial, and chlamydial infections. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1995:189–212.
  8. Reimann CA, Hayes EB, DiGuiseppi C, et al. Epidemiology of neuroinvasive arboviral disease in the United States, 1999–2007. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2008;79:974–9. CrossRef PubMed

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario