domingo, 22 de mayo de 2016

Time for a technoethics commission?

Time for a technoethics commission?



Time for a technoethics commission?
     


As another presidential bioethics commission finishes up, A US computational scientist has suggested the next US president should create a ‘technoethics commission’.

Daniel N. Rockmore, professor of in the Department of Mathematics, Computational Science, and Computer Science at Dartmouth College, recently published an article in The Conversation advocating for the establishment of clear “social norms” for digital technologies “through a high-profile, public, collaborative process.”

Rockmore, while not wishing to engage in scaremongering, believes that many are too ready to embrace the convenience of new computer technologies without considering the potential dangers:

“…the fact remains that we are thoughtlessly deploying technologies with little concern for, or debate around, their context and implications for society.”
He suggests that digital technologies have the potential to profoundly effect the ‘human condition’, and that a commission could be a value platform in which to discuss such risks:

“…surely questions around topics like wearables, privacy, transparency, information ownership and access, workplace transformation, and the attendant implications for self-definition, self-improvement and human interaction are at the foundation of any consideration of the human condition.”“…a commission with representation from a range of constituencies, engaged in open conversation, might serve to illuminate the various interests and concerns.”
Late last month Nature published an editorial expressing concerns about the unregulated development of artificial intelligence technology. The journal wrote, “…it is crucial that progress in technology is matched by solid, well-funded research to anticipate the scenarios it could bring about, and to study possible political and economic reforms that will allow those usurped by machinery to contribute to society.”
- See more at: http://www.bioedge.org/bioethics/time-for-a-technoethics-commission/11880#sthash.HxOCBy6t.dpuf





Bioedge



Twelve years ago, political scientist Francis Fukuyama described transhumanism as “the world’s most dangerous idea”. In 2004, that sounded a bit daft -- almost no one had ever heard of the idea. For many people it still does, but now transhumanism is going mainstream.
Movies are being made about transhumanist themes; newspapers like the Washington Post are running feature articles on it; and a transhumanist is running for US President. It is indeed dangerous. As Fukuyama said:
The seeming reasonableness of the project, particularly when considered in small increments, is part of its danger. Society is unlikely to fall suddenly under the spell of the transhumanist worldview. But it is very possible that we will nibble at biotechnology's tempting offerings without realizing that they come at a frightful moral cost.
Just a reminder: please consider a donation to keep BioEdge afloat. We need to raise $15,000 this year. Next week will be our final appeal letter.

http://www.bioedge.org/supportbioedge 




Michael Cook

Editor

BioEdge



This week in BioEdge


by Michael Cook | May 22, 2016
Is the movement becoming mainstream?



by Michael Cook | May 22, 2016
Learning from experience of UK in brushing aside controversy



by Xavier Symons | May 22, 2016
A group of scientists in the US are continuing to conduct research on human-animal hybrid embryos, despite a moratorium on funding from the National Institutes…



by Xavier Symons | May 22, 2016
A US computational scientist has suggested the next US president should create a ‘technoethics commission’.



by Michael Cook | May 22, 2016
Head transplants may not work as planned



by Michael Cook | May 22, 2016
Could lead to genetically-engineered humans



by Xavier Symons | May 21, 2016
A US doctor has voiced grave concern about government inaction on increasing suicide rates in the country.



by Xavier Symons | May 21, 2016
Researchers have called for greater attention to be paid to "spiritual care" in the treatment of elderly patients.



by Xavier Symons | May 18, 2016
There has been growing interest among ethicists in the theme of vulnerability. I recently spoke about the topic with bioethicist Steve Matthews.
BioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
New Media Foundation | Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605 

Time for a technoethics commission?

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario