lunes, 4 de diciembre de 2017

Impact of multi-gene mutational profiling on clinical trial outcomes in metastatic breast cancer. - PubMed - NCBI

Impact of multi-gene mutational profiling on clinical trial outcomes in metastatic breast cancer. - PubMed - NCBI



 2017 Nov 24. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4580-2. [Epub ahead of print]

Impact of multi-gene mutational profiling on clinical trial outcomes in metastatic breast cancer.

Pezo RC1,2,3Chen TW4Berman HK5,6Mulligan AM5,6Razak AA1,2Siu LL1,2,7Cescon DW1,2Amir E1,2Elser C1,2Warr DG1,2Sridhar SS1,2Yu C7Wang L8Stockley TL5,6,7Kamel-Reid S5,6,7,9Bedard PL10,11,12.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has identified recurrent genomic alterations in metastatic breast cancer (MBC); however, the clinical utility of incorporating routine sequencing to guide treatment decisions in this setting is unclear. We examine the frequency of genomic alterations in MBC patients from academic and community hospitals and correlate with clinical outcomes.

METHODS:

MBC patients with good performance status were prospectively recruited at the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM) in Canada. Molecular profiling on DNA extracted from FFPE archival tissues was performed on the Sequenom MassArray platform or the TruSeq Amplicon Cancer Panel (TSACP) on the MiSeq platform. Clinical trial outcomes by RECIST 1.1 and time on treatment were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS:

From January 2012 to November 2015, 483 MBC patients were enrolled and 440 were genotyped. At least one somatic mutation was identified in 46% of patients, most commonly in PIK3CA (28%) or TP53 (13%). Of 203 patients with ≥ 1 mutation(s), 15% were treated on genotype-matched and 9% on non-matched trials. There was no significant difference for median time on treatment for patients treated on matched vs. non-matched therapies (3.6 vs. 3.8 months; p = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study provides real-world outcomes on hotspot genotyping and small targeted panel sequencing of MBC patients from academic and community settings. Few patients were matched to clinical trials with targeted therapies. More comprehensive profiling and improved access to clinical trials may increase therapeutic options for patients with actionable mutations. Further studies are needed to evaluate if this approach leads to improved clinical outcomes.

KEYWORDS:

Metastatic breast cancer; Molecular profiling; PIK3CA mutation; Targeted therapies

PMID:
 
29177603
 
DOI:
 
10.1007/s10549-017-4580-2

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario