Angiostrongylus cantonensis DNA in Cerebrospinal Fluid of Persons with Eosinophilic Meningitis, Laos

Table

Damien K.Y. Ming

, Sayaphet Rattanavong, Tehmina Bharucha, Onanong Sengvilaipaseuth, Audrey Dubot-Pérès, Paul N. Newton, and Matthew T. Robinson

Author affiliations: Imperial College London, London, UK (D.K.Y. Ming); Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital Wellcome Trust Research Unit, Vientiane, Laos (D.K.Y. Ming, S. Rattanavong, T. Bharucha, O. Sengvilaipaseuth, A. Dubot-Pérès, P.N. Newton, M.T. Robinson); University College London, London (T. Bharucha); Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France (A. Dubot-Pérès); University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (P.N. Newton, M.T. Robinson)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Definitive identification of Angiostrongylus cantonensis parasites from clinical specimens is difficult. As a result, regional epidemiology and burden are poorly characterized. To ascertain presence of this parasite in patients in Laos with eosinophilic meningitis, we performed quantitative PCRs on 36 cerebrospinal fluid samples; 4 positive samples confirmed the parasite’s presence.

Humans are incidental hosts of Angiostrongylus cantonensis nematodes; global distribution of these nematodes is being increasingly recognized (1). Ingestion of larvae from undercooked infected snails or food contaminated with mollusk secretions can result in the migration of A. cantonensis parasites through the human central nervous system (CNS) (2). The presence of the parasite and associated inflammation in the CNS can contribute to a meningoencephalitic syndrome, typified by a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) eosinophilia constituting >10% of total CSF leukocyte count. Formal diagnosis of angiostrongyliasis is difficult because the parasite is typically present in low numbers in the CSF (3). Serologic methods are limited by cross-reactivity with other helminths (4), and antibody-based methods may lack sensitivity, especially during acute illness (5).

Host sampling studies have identified A. cantonensis parasites in some Mekong region countries but not in Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Laos) (6). To ascertain the presence of this parasite in patients with eosinophilic meningitis in Laos, we tested samples from a cohort of 1,065 patients suspected of having CNS infection at Mahosot Hospital, Vientiane, Laos, during 2003–2013 by Giemsa staining and identified 54 CSF samples containing >10% eosinophils. Of these, 36 samples from 35 patients were available for this study (1 patient underwent lumbar puncture twice) and were tested by conventional and quantitative PCR (cPCR and qPCR). From the same cohort, we also performed qPCR testing on another 50 CSF samples with 1%–9% eosinophils.

DNA was extracted from 200 μL of CSF by using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) and eluted in 30 μL buffer. We ran the extract in parallel with positive samples (A. cantonensis DNA from experimentally infected rats, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia) and negative controls by using published cPCR (7) and qPCR (8) protocols. We used Platinum PCR SuperMix (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and performed assays on a Bio-Rad CFX96 (Bio-Rad, Watford, UK).

Among patients with CSF eosinophilia >10%, male patients predominated, although sex of patients did not differ significantly among patients with or without CSF eosinophilia (Table). Of the 36 CSF samples that contained >10% eosinophils, all were negative by cPCR, but 4 (11.1%) were positive for A. cantonensis DNA by qPCR; median quantification cycle was 35.9 (range 34.1–37.4). Sensitivity of qPCR was apparently higher than that of cPCR. The median duration of illness for patients with positive qPCR was 4 (range 0–10) days. Of 3 patients with a positive qPCR, 2 reported that they had eaten raw snails in the previous month.

Results from 2 CSF samples obtained from the same patient and tested by qPCR were discordant; CSF obtained after 7 days of illness was negative for A. cantonensis DNA, but a sample obtained on day 13 was positive (quantification cycle 34.1). This finding is consistent with previous observations (8), and it is plausible that during the acute stages of infection, insufficient nucleic material is present for detection. Although lumbar puncture is invasive, a high clinical suspicion of angiostrongyliasis in the context of a negative qPCR may therefore warrant a repeated lumbar puncture. All positive samples had CSF eosinophil proportions >40%, and all samples containing a 1%–9% eosinophil proportion tested negative by qPCR, supporting the conventional cutoff of a CSF eosinophilia >10% in the diagnosis of CNS angiostrongyliasis.

Our findings are consistent with those from studies demonstrating A. cantonensis parasites as a cause of eosinophilic meningitis in the region, although the proportion of A. cantonensis–positive cases in our cohort was lower than that from Vietnam (11.1% vs. 67.3%) (9). Results may be affected by factors such as geographic location, differences in healthcare access, and the contribution of other causes of eosinophilic meningitis, such as Gnathostoma spinigerum nematodes. In the absence of a reliable reference diagnostic standard, we were unable to estimate the proportion of false-negative results in this cohort or to correlate findings with other immunodiagnostic modalities. Further studies on eosinophilic meningitis from a wider geographic area and improved diagnostics would help establish the overall clinical burden of CNS angiostrongyliasis in Laos.

Diet (consumption of raw snails and food contaminated by snails) is considered a major risk factor for angiostrongyliasis, making an epidemiologic link and public health interventions a possibility. The exact host species responsible for transmission remains unclear, however, given that A. cantonensis parasites have apparently yet to be identified within snails in Laos.

Our identification of A. cantonensis DNA by qPCR of CSF samples from 4 (11%) of 35 patients with eosinophilic meningitis confirms the parasite’s presence in Laos. Further regional characterization, coupled with dietary surveys, will be invaluable for stratifying the risk for human transmission and guiding public health interventions.

Dr. Ming is an academic clinical fellow in infectious diseases at Imperial College London. His research interests include tropical medicine and parasitology.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful for the support of the directors and staff of Mahosot Hospital, especially of the Adult Infectious Disease ward and the Microbiology Laboratory.

Funding was provided by the Wellcome Trust (London, UK) and L’Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (Marseille, France).

References

Barratt J, Chan D, Sandaradura I, Malik R, Spielman D, Lee R, et al. Angiostrongylus cantonensis: a review of its distribution, molecular biology and clinical significance as a human pathogen. Parasitology. 2016;143:1087–118. DOI PubMed
Wang Q-PP, Lai D-HH, Zhu X-QQ, Chen X-GG, Lun Z-RR. Human angiostrongyliasis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:621–30. DOI PubMed
Punyagupta S, Juttijudata P, Bunnag T. Eosinophilic meningitis in Thailand. Clinical studies of 484 typical cases probably caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1975;24:921–31. DOI PubMed
Morassutti AL, Rascoe LN, Handali S, DA Silva AJ, Wilkins PP, Graeff-Teixeira C. Cross-reactivity of the 31 kDa antigen of Angiostrongylus cantonensis - Dealing with the immunodiagnosis of meningoencephalitis. Parasitology. 2017;144:459–63. DOI PubMed
Slom TJ, Cortese MM, Gerber SI, Jones RC, Holtz TH, Lopez AS, et al. An outbreak of eosinophilic meningitis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensisin travelers returning from the Caribbean. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:668–75. DOI PubMed
Rodpai R, Intapan PM, Thanchomnang T, Sanpool O, Sadaow L, Laymanivong S, et al. Angiostrongylus cantonensis and A. malaysiensis broadly overlap in Thailand, Lao PDR, Cambodia and Myanmar: a molecular survey of larvae in land snails. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0161128. DOI PubMed
Qvarnstrom Y, Sullivan JJ, Bishop HS, Hollingsworth R, da Silva AJ. PCR-based detection of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in tissue and mucus secretions from molluscan hosts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:1415–9. DOI PubMed
Qvarnstrom Y, Xayavong M, da Silva AC, Park SY, Whelen AC, Calimlim PS, et al. Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of Angiostrongylus cantonensis DNA in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with eosinophilic meningitis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94:176–81. DOI PubMed
McBride A, Chau TTH, Hong NTT, Mai NTH, Anh NT, Thanh TT, et al. Angiostrongylus cantonensis is an important cause of eosinophilic meningitis in southern Vietnam. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:1784–7. DOI PubMed