Genomic Characterization of Recrudescent Plasmodium malariae after Treatment with Artemether/Lumefantrine - Volume 23, Number 8—August 2017 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

Genomic Characterization of Recrudescent Plasmodium malariae after Treatment with Artemether/Lumefantrine - Volume 23, Number 8—August 2017 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

Volume 23, Number 8—August 2017

Research

Genomic Characterization of Recrudescent Plasmodium malariae after Treatment with Artemether/Lumefantrine

On This Page

• Results
• Discussion
• Cite This Article

Figures

• Figure 1
• Figure 2
• Figure 3

Technical Appendices

• Technical Appendix

Downloads

• PDF[3.39 MB - 8 pgs]
• RIS[TXT - 2 KB]

Altmetric

Gavin G. Rutledge1, Ian Marr1, G. Khai Lin Huang, Sarah Auburn, Jutta Marfurt, Mandy Sanders, Nicholas J. White, Matthew Berriman, Chris I. Newbold, Nicholas M. Anstey, Thomas D. Otto , and Ric N. Price 

Author affiliations: Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom (G.G. Rutledge, M. Sanders, M. Berriman, C.I. Newbold, T.D. Otto); Royal Darwin Hospital, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia (I. Marr, G.K.L. Huang, N.M. Anstey, R.N. Price); Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia (S. Auburn, J. Marfurt, N.M. Anstey, R.N. Price); Mahidol University Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, Thailand (N.J. White); University of Oxford Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Oxford, United Kingdom (N.J. White, R.N. Price); University of Oxford Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Oxford (C.I. Newbold)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Plasmodium malariae is the only human malaria parasite species with a 72-hour intraerythrocytic cycle and the ability to persist in the host for life. We present a case of a P. malariae infection with clinical recrudescence after directly observed administration of artemether/lumefantrine. By using whole-genome sequencing, we show that the initial infection was polyclonal and the recrudescent isolate was a single clone present at low density in the initial infection. Haplotypic analysis of the clones in the initial infection revealed that they were all closely related and were presumably recombinant progeny originating from the same infective mosquito bite. We review possible explanations for the P. malariae treatment failure and conclude that a 3-day artemether/lumefantrine regimen is suboptimal for this species because of its long asexual life cycle.

During the past decade, intensification of malaria control efforts has substantially reduced the global burden of malaria from Plasmodium falciparum. This trend has often been associated with increased recognition of the burden of malarial disease caused by the other Plasmodium species (1). P. malariae, 1 of the 6 Plasmodiumspecies that commonly infect humans, is endemic throughout parts of Africa (2,3), South America (4), Asia, and the western Pacific (5). P. malariae is unique among the human-infective Plasmodium species in having a 72-hour intraerythrocytic lifecycle with variable but often prolonged pre-erythrocytic intrahepatic development (6). P. malariae can persist in the human host for years and possibly an entire lifetime. Although it is often asymptomatic, chronic parasitemia in endemic areas is associated with substantial rates of illness, including anemia and nephrotic syndrome (7–9).

A key strategy for malaria elimination is strengthening of health systems to deliver early diagnosis and highly effective therapy. Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) has been central to this approach, with proven efficacy against multidrug-resistant P. falciparum, multidrug-resistant P. vivax,and P. knowlesi (10–13). In recent years, there have been increasing calls for a universal policy of ACT for all species of malaria (10–13). However, the efficacy of ACT against P. malariae is poorly documented.

Although chronic infection with P. malariae is well-recognized (14), little is known regarding how the parasites manage to evade host immunity and the intrahost dynamics of the underlying parasite population. Recent advances in molecular genetics have produced the first descriptive analyses of the whole genome sequence of P. malariae (15,16). The P. malariae reference genome is 33.6 Mb in size, has 6,540 genes, and has an average guanine plus cytosine content of 24% (15).

We report a case of a P. malariae infection in a patient residing in a non–malaria-endemic environment that resulted in recrudescence months after treatment with artemether/lumefantrine (AL). By using whole-genome sequencing of isolates from the initial and the recrudescent infections, we show that the 2 major P. malariae haplotypes, constituting ≈90% of the parasite load in the initial infection, were cleared successfully by AL, whereas a third haplotype, constituting a minority subpopulation in the initial infection, survived and recrudesced.

Results

The Patient

Figure 1. Timeline of the clinical case of a patient with Plasmodium malariaeinfection diagnosed and treated at Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, March–April 2015, showing the timing (A), treatment (B),...

A 31-year-old Uganda-born man, weighing ≈77 kg (≈170 lbs), who had been a resident in Australia for 5 years sought care at Royal Darwin Hospital (Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia) on March 1, 2015, with a 4-day history of fevers and headaches. He had returned to Australia 56 days previously after a 2-week trip to Uganda visiting friends and relatives (Figure 1, panels A, E). He had spent 14 days in a rural malaria-endemic area in eastern Uganda. Although he had not taken regular malaria prophylaxis, he had self-medicated with a locally acquired oral course of AL on the second and third days of his trip, despite being clinically well (Figure 1, panels B, D). He returned to Australia (now a malaria-free country) in January 2015 until seeking care after a short febrile illness in late February. On examination, he had a tympanic temperature of 37.5°C and a heart rate of 110 beats/min but no manifestations of severe malaria. Rapid diagnostic testing with BinaxNOW (Binax, Inc., Inverness Medical Professional Diagnostics, Scarborough, ME, USA) for malaria was positive for aldolase but negative for histidine-rich protein 2. Species-specific PCR was positive for P. malariae and negative for all other Plasmodium species (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages]). Thick and thin blood film examination confirmed P. malariae parasitemia (12,140 parasites/μL) with all stages of asexual development visible on the blood film (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Figure 1, panels A, B). The blood film was otherwise unremarkable; in particular, no evidence for hyposplenism was found. The patient was not immunosuppressed, and an HIV serologic test was negative. A hepatitis C serologic test was positive but with a viral load that was below the limit of quantification (<12 IU/mL).

The patient was administered a single 20/120 mg tablet of AL on the first day because of a prescribing error but subsequently continued with a supervised standard regimen of 80/480 mg every 12 hours taken with fatty food to complete a full course of 6 doses over 3 days, equivalent to a total dosage of 6.2 mg/kg of artemether and 37.4 mg/kg of lumefantrine. Glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase function was normal, and a single 30-mg dose of primaquine was administered on day 2. His hemoglobin was 126 g/dL and he received no blood transfusion. After treatment, his parasitemia declined to 1,269/µL at 32 hours, 488/µL at 41 hours, and 55/µL at 56 hours. He was afebrile and symptom-free within 36 hours of admission. However, before discharge on day 6, thick blood film examination was still positive (192/µL), but by day 11, his repeat blood film examination and his aldolase rapid diagnostic test results were negative.

The patient remained in urban Darwin but returned to the hospital 52 days later, on April 22, 2015, with a 2-week history of fevers, fatigue, and headache. Microscopy again identified P. malariae with a parasite count of 3,332/µL (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Figure 1, panels C, D). Chloroquine was unavailable, so the patient was re-treated with oral hydroxychloroquine with an 800-mg loading dose, followed by 400 mg at 6 hours, 400 mg at 24 hours, 400 mg at 48 hours, and a single 45-mg dose of oral primaquine. The parasite count declined rapidly to 37/µL at 28 hours, 191/µL at 49 hours, and 76/µL at 88 hours of treatment. His symptoms resolved rapidly. Thick and thin blood films were negative on day 4 and remained negative on retesting at days 8, 35, 41, and 84, and the patient remained free of symptoms throughout. A PCR on blood collected at 12 weeks was also negative.

Whole-Genome Sequencing

Extensive sequencing was performed from blood samples obtained from the initial (PmUG01) and recrudescent (PmUG02) infection (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Table 1), covering >99% of the genome at >20× for both infections. By using additional P. malariae samples published previously (15), we identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using GATK’s UnifiedGenotyper (Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, USA) (17) and filtered them based on several parameters (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Table 2). A multidimensional scaling plot of the samples based on their SNP allele frequency-spectra revealed that PmUG01 and PmUG02 were more closely related to each other than to any of the other samples (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Figure 2), as expected if they were related recombinants derived from the same original infection.

Searching solely for SNPs that distinguish PmUG01 and PmUG02, we identified 2,631 variants after filtering (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Table 2). PmUG01 was the sample from which the reference genome (R1) was constructed (15), and only 1 SNP in PmUG01 suggested a nucleotide base different from the reference strain, probably because it was in a repetitive region (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Table 4). PmUG01 appeared to be a polyclonal infection with a bimodal distribution of alternate (i.e., nonreference) alleles at frequencies of 0.15 and 0.35 (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Figure 3, panel A). Conversely, PmUG02 appeared to be a monoclonal infection with ≈85% of sites being either fixed for the reference allele or for an alternative allele (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Figure 3, panel B). Comparison of the initial and recrudescent infections revealed that heterozygous sites in the initial infection had become either homozygous alternate (≈40%) or homozygous reference (≈45%) (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Table 4). Analysis of the genotype calls across the genome (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Figure 4) revealed that, whereas the heterozygous sites from the initial infection were spread evenly across the 14 chromosomes, the homozygous alternate sites in the recrudescent infection were present in distinct clusters, implying that the initial infection was polyclonal and that the recrudescence was attributable to a single clone that was closely related to the reference clone.

Figure 2. Analysis of the minor haplotype (H2) that caused recrudescence of Plasmodium malariaeinfection in a patient at Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, March–April 2015, showing distribution of SNP alternative...

Comparison of the distribution of the alternate allele frequencies throughout the genome of the initial and recrudescent strains (Figure 2) revealed bands of alleles at frequencies of ≈0.15 and ≈0.35 in the initial infection spatially clustered throughout the genome. The alleles that increased in relative frequency in PmUG02 were mostly at frequencies of ≈0.15, whereas the alleles at frequencies of ≈0.35 decreased in frequency and the positions became homozygous reference in PmUG02 (Figure 2). These data strongly suggested that, in addition to R1, 2 minor clones (minor haplotypes) were also present. Of these 2, the clone with the haplotype comprising alternate alleles at frequencies of ≈0.35 (H1) appeared to have been eliminated during the drug treatment because no alleles specific to H1 were present in the recrudescent infection. The other minor clone comprised a haplotype with alternate alleles at frequencies of ≈0.15 (H2) in the initial infection; this clone appeared to have caused the recrudescence (Figure 1, panel C). Based on the relative alternate allele frequencies of the 3 haplotypes in the initial infection, ≈60% of the parasites were of the R1 haplotype, 30% of H1, and 10% of H2. These estimates were broadly consistent with the ratio of alleles in tri-allelic sites (0.69:0.22:0.09) (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Table 5). The ratio of alleles in these tri-allelic sites changes markedly in PmUG02 (0.13:0.06:0.81), with over half of sites becoming homozygous for H2 but with some heterogeneity in the other sites (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Table 6), probably because of the low coverage depth and because they were in repetitive regions.

Unexpectedly, several SNPs at high allele frequencies (>0.4) also increased in frequency in the recrudescent strain. Testing by using additional P. malariaesamples (15) showed that ≈80% of these SNPs were homozygous for the alternate allele in >1 other P. malariae samples, whereas ≈30% were homozygous in all other P. malariae samples (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Figure 5). This observation indicated that of these unusual SNPs, ≈50% were highly polymorphic, whereas ≈30% were probably low-frequency SNPs with rare variants present in the reference strain. This would explain the observation of SNPs with high reference allele frequency in the initial infection that became homozygous alternate in the recrudescence, given that they were probably SNPs with alternate alleles shared by H1 and H2.

To clarify the relationships of the different haplotypes with each other, we classified every genome region by whether any of the 3 haplotypes were identical to each other (Figure 2; Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages]). Approximately 25% of the genome is shared between H1 and R1 and between H2 and R1. No regions were shared between H1 and H2, which suggested that both H1 and H2 were half-siblings of R1, although they did not share any parent between themselves (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Figure 6). The finding that all haplotypes were related to each other through R1 further suggested that all strains were transmitted from the same mosquito bite and that the mosquito ingested at least 4 different parental haplotypes (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Figure 6).

Analysis of SNPs in orthologs of known drug-resistance genes identified 3 nonsynonymous SNPs in the multidrug resistance protein 2 (mdr2) gene, 1 of which was in the ABC transporter domain, and 2 in the ABC transporter domain of ABC transporter C family member 2, present in the recrudescent strain (H2) but not the other strains (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Table 7). No evidence was found for copy number variation in any gene compared with the reference strain, and the reference strain did not appear to have an amplification of the multidrug resistance protein 1 gene compared with any of the other P. malariae samples.

Discussion

This report of a case of recurrent P. malariae malaria is unusual in that it describes the molecular characterization and confirmation of a treatment failure after directly observed, appropriately administered, quality-assured AL dosing in a nonendemic environment where reinfection was not possible. Whole-genome sequencing demonstrated that the recrudescence was attributable to a minor clone present in the initial polyclonal infection. The case raises 2 important questions: first, what was the cause of treatment failure; and second, why did recrudescence arise from the minor clone rather than a dominant reference clone?

Although the efficacy of AL for P. malariae infection is assumed in many national guidelines (18), P. malariae monoinfections are relatively unusual and often of low density. To our knowledge, there have been no published efficacy series of AL with the long follow-up necessary to assess efficacy against a parasite with a 72-hour life cycle. In a nonrandomized efficacy study of 4 PCR-confirmed P. malariae infections treated with AL in Gabon (1 P. malariaemonoinfection and 3 mixed P. malariae/P. falciparum infections), all 4 were microscopy negative at day 28, with no follow-up beyond this time (19). Among 80 PCR-confirmed P. malariae/P. falciparum mixed species infections in Uganda, 12% were still PCR-positive for P. malariae at day 7 and 6% were still PCR-positive on day 17 (20). An additional 3 reports have documented P. malariae infections occurring at 38 days, 47 days, and 4 months after AL treatment of an initial microscopy-diagnosed P. falciparum infection in returned travelers with no further possible malaria exposure (21–23).

Figure 3. The different scenarios under which a second Plasmodium malariaeinfection could have occurred from the initial infection diagnosed in a patient at Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, March–April 2015....

Several plausible explanations might account for a recurrence of P. malariae parasitemia after treatment with AL (Figure 3). The last indigenous case of malaria in the Northern Territory was in 1962, with no subsequent cases of introduced malaria or autochthonous transmission (24); hence, the possibility of reinfection can be excluded (Figure 3, panel A). Additionally, the presence of the H2 haplotype in the initial infection and recrudescent infection confirms treatment failure.

Inadequate drug absorption resulting in suboptimal serum drug concentrations can cause treatment failure (Figure 3, panel B). Artemether is rapidly absorbed and eliminated (half-life of a few hours), whereas lumefantrine is variably absorbed and more slowly eliminated (half-life ≈3.2 days) (25). Lumefantrine is a lipophilic compound with erratic bioavailability unless administered with a small fatty meal (26), and for this reason, guidelines recommend administration of AL with a fatty meal such as milk or a small biscuit. In the case of our patient, we were unable to confirm adequate serum concentrations of lumefantrine; however, the patient took a complete course of treatment, and all doses were supervised in the hospital and administered with a milk biscuit to ensure good absorption. None of the treatment doses were vomited. In this scenario, one would expect >98% efficacy against P. falciparum (27). In addition, the clones associated with the R1 and H1 haplotypes, accounting for ≈90% of the parasite load, were cleared, suggesting that the plasma drug concentrations were sufficient to eliminate both infections. Nevertheless, considerable inter-individual variation exists in lumefantrine exposure, and this patient may have had relatively low concentrations.

Cure of malaria in a nonimmune patient requires that antimalarial blood concentrations are sustained above the parasites’ MIC until the entire parasite biomass has been eliminated. In the presence of antimalarial drugs, the parasite biomass generally decreases over time in an exponential manner, with drug concentrations needing to be sustained above the MIC for >4 life cycles (28). In the case of our patient, the baseline parasitemia at initial presentation was 12,000/µL, which is relatively high compared with most P. malariae clinical infections (6). Thus, the combination of the long parasite life cycle such that 1 rather than 2 asexual cycles were exposed to artemether, and the short period (≈16 days) for which lumefantrine was at concentrations sufficient to kill the parasite may have resulted in parasites surviving the initial treatment and reestablishing a chronic parasitemia that was then sustained for 50 days before recrudescing (Figure 3, panel C).

Another possibility is that some parasites could have sequestered (Figure 3, panel D) or become dormant (Figure 3, panel E). Whereas dormancy would allow a proportion of the parasites to evade blood-stage schizontocidal activity, plausible sites for sequestration of P. malariae–infected erythrocytes would still be exposed to therapeutic concentrations of blood-stage antimalarials, making this possibility an unlikely explanation for this patient’s recrudescent infection. P. malariae is well-recognized as having a prolonged preerythrocytic phase and a prepatent period of 16–59 days (6). The initial treatment course of AL was administered 56 days after the patient left Uganda, so any preerythrocytic stages were probably not present at the time of initial AL treatment.

Although the ability to form hypnozoites (dormant exoerythrocytic stages) occurs in 3 human malaria parasite species (P. vivax, P. ovale curtisi, and P. o. wallikeri), the evidence that latent exoerythrocytic stages do not occur in P. malariae is limited (6). Case reports have documented P. malariae producing symptomatic disease many years after exposure to infection, as noted in the case of a 74-year-old woman in Greece with P. malariae reactivation after >40 years (29). Such latency suggests that low-level parasitemia could persist for many years after infection, and indeed may be lifelong. In the case of our patient, parasite recrudescence occurred >100 days after he had left a malaria-endemic area.

Although inadequate drug absorption (Figure 3, panel B), duration of treatment (Figure 3, panel C), or dormancy (Figure 3, panel E) all may have contributed to parasite recrudescence, these indiscriminate explanations would be expected to occur primarily in the dominant strain during the initial infection (28) (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Figure 7). One could speculate that the H2 minor parasite population might have emerged from a hepatic schizont that ruptured days after those giving rise to the majority haplotypes and, despite genetic similarity, had substantial differences in surface antigenicity. The antibody response to the primary infection, which would have reached a maximum ≈3 weeks after the illness began, would have been directed against the majority haplotypes and might not have recognized the minor population (Figure 3, panel F). Alternatively, more of the minor population might have been in the dormant state compared with the dominant circulating clones with R1 or H1 haplotypes, or more might have been at a higher biomass in erythrocytes sequestered elsewhere, enabling a proportion to evade antimalarial drug action and recrudesce.

Finally, the minority clone with H2 haplotype might have recrudesced because of a fitness advantage over the other clones/haplotypes (Technical Appendix[PDF - 703 KB - 15 pages] Figure 7, panels B, C), possibly including relative resistance to either artemether or lumefantrine (Figure 3, panel G). In P. falciparum, resistance to artemether is acquired through mutations in the propeller domain of K13 (30), whereas P. falciparum resistance to lumefantrine is associated with mutations and copy number variation in the Pfmdr1 gene (31,32). Although neither of these genes had nonsynonymous mutations in H2, 1 nonsynonymous mutation was noted in the ABC transporter domain of mdr2, potentially involved in artemisinin resistance (33,34), and 2 nonsynonymous mutations were noted in the multidrug resistance–associated protein 2 gene, which has been implicated in reduced ex vivo susceptibility to lumefantrine in P. falciparum (35). We also identified 2 nonsynonymous SNPs in the dihydrofolate reductase homologue. Low serum concentrations, a modest reduction in lumefantrine efficacy, the prolonged life cycle of P. malariae, and rapid elimination of lumefantrine all might have contributed to the observed treatment failure in our patient.

In conclusion, we have described a case of P. malariae recrudescence occurring in a non–malaria-endemic country after adequately administered AL. Whole-genome sequencing data revealed that the monoclonal recrudescence consisted of a minor haplotype that accounted for ≈10% of the initial infection and that all the haplotypes in the initial infection were related to each other and therefore probably originated from the same infective mosquito bite. Although the haplotypes were closely related, the genomic data suggest that >4 parental haplotypes were ingested by the mosquito, indicating considerable diversity and transmission of P. malariae. This case raises concerns about the adequacy of ACTs with a short half-life partner drug, such as AL, in treating P. malariae infections and suggests that optimal ACTs to treat P. malariae should include a slowly eliminated partner drug. Our findings reinforce the importance of a longer duration of follow-up monitoring of patients infected with P. malariae for late recrudescence.

Mr. Rutledge is a doctoral student in the Parasite Genomics and the Natural Genetic Variation groups at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom. His primary research interest is the application of computational tools and methods to improve our understanding of human malaria. Dr. Marr is an infectious disease and microbiology physician at the Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.

Acknowledgments

The sequencing data generated in this study are provided in the European Nucleotide Archive under accession codes ERS1110316 and ERS1110319.

This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (grant no. MR/J004111/1) and the Wellcome Trust (grant no. 098051 and Senior Fellowship in Clinical Science to R.N.P., 200909). R.N.P., C.I.N., and N.J.W. are funded by the Wellcome Trust. N.M.A. is supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (practitioner fellowship no. 1042072).

Author contributions: I.M., G.K.L.H., N.M.A., and R.P. oversaw the clinical presentation and management of the patient; S.A. and J.M. coordinated laboratory processing and collection of isolates; T.D.O. and R.N.P. designed the study; M.S. coordinated sequencing; G.G.R. performed the data analysis and with I.M. wrote the manuscript; and N.M.A., M.B., C.I.N., N.J.W., S.A., J.M., N.M.A., T.D.O., and R.N.P. critically revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Abeyasinghe RR, Galappaththy GN, Smith Gueye C, Kahn JG, Feachem RG. Malaria control and elimination in Sri Lanka: documenting progress and success factors in a conflict setting. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43162. DOIPubMed
2. Boudin C, Robert V, Verhave JP, Carnevale P, Ambroise-Thomas P. Plasmodium falciparum and P. malariae epidemiology in a West African village.Bull World Health Organ. 1991;69:199–205.PubMed
3. Molineaux L, Storey J, Cohen JE, Thomas A. A longitudinal study of human malaria in the West African Savanna in the absence of control measures: relationships between different Plasmodium species, in particular P. falciparum and P. malariae. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1980;29:725–37.PubMed
4. Scopel KK, Fontes CJ, Nunes AC, Horta MF, Braga EM. High prevalence of Plamodium malariae infections in a Brazilian Amazon endemic area (Apiacás-Mato Grosso State) as detected by polymerase chain reaction. Acta Trop. 2004;90:61–4. DOIPubMed
5. Kaneko A, Taleo G, Kalkoa M, Yaviong J, Reeve PA, Ganczakowski M, et al. Malaria epidemiology, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency and human settlement in the Vanuatu Archipelago. Acta Trop. 1998;70:285–302. DOIPubMed
6. Collins WE, Jeffery GM. Plasmodium malariae: parasite and disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:579–92. DOIPubMed
7. Gilles HM, Hendrickse RG. Nephrosis in Nigerian children. Role of Plasmodium malariae, and effect of antimalarial treatment. BMJ. 1963;2:27–31. DOIPubMed
8. Langford S, Douglas NM, Lampah DA, Simpson JA, Kenangalem E, Sugiarto P, et al. Plasmodium malariae infection associated with a high burden of anemia: a hospital-based surveillance study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004195. DOIPubMed
9. Douglas NM, Lampah DA, Kenangalem E, Simpson JA, Poespoprodjo JR, Sugiarto P, et al. Major burden of severe anemia from non-falciparum malaria species in Southern Papua: a hospital-based surveillance study. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001575, discussion e1001575.
10. Douglas NM, Anstey NM, Angus BJ, Nosten F, Price RN. Artemisinin combination therapy for vivax malaria. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:405–16. DOIPubMed
11. Ratcliff A, Siswantoro H, Kenangalem E, Maristela R, Wuwung RM, Laihad F, et al. Two fixed-dose artemisinin combinations for drug-resistant falciparum and vivax malaria in Papua, Indonesia: an open-label randomised comparison. Lancet. 2007;369:757–65. DOIPubMed
12. Grigg MJ, William T, Menon J, Dhanaraj P, Barber BE, Wilkes CS, et al. Artesunate-mefloquine versus chloroquine for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium knowlesi malaria in Malaysia (ACT KNOW): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:180–8. DOIPubMed
13. Nosten F, van Vugt M, Price R, Luxemburger C, Thway KL, Brockman A, et al. Effects of artesunate-mefloquine combination on incidence of Plasmodium falciparum malaria and mefloquine resistance in western Thailand: a prospective study. Lancet. 2000;356:297–302. DOIPubMed
14. Assennato SM, Berzuini A, Foglieni B, Spreafico M, Allain JP, Prati D. Plasmodium genome in blood donors at risk for malaria after several years of residence in Italy. Transfusion. 2014;54:2419–24. DOIPubMed
15. Rutledge GG, Böhme U, Sanders M, Reid AJ, Cotton JA, Maiga-Ascofare O, et al. Plasmodium malariae and P. ovale genomes provide insights into malaria parasite evolution. Nature. 2017;542:101–4. DOIPubMed
16. Ansari HR, Templeton TJ, Subudhi AK, Ramaprasad A, Tang J, Lu F, et al. Genome-scale comparison of expanded gene families in Plasmodium ovale wallikeri and Plasmodium ovale curtisi with Plasmodium malariae and with other Plasmodium species. Int J Parasitol. 2016;46:685–96. DOIPubMed
17. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–303. DOIPubMed
18. Lalloo DG, Shingadia D, Bell DJ, Beeching NJ, Whitty CJ, Chiodini PL; PHE Advisory Committee on Malaria Prevention in UK Travellers. UK malaria treatment guidelines 2016. J Infect. 2016;72:635–49. DOIPubMed
19. Mombo-Ngoma G, Kleine C, Basra A, Würbel H, Diop DA, Capan M, et al. Prospective evaluation of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of non-falciparum and mixed-species malaria in Gabon. Malar J. 2012;11:120. DOIPubMed
20. Betson M, Sousa-Figueiredo JC, Atuhaire A, Arinaitwe M, Adriko M, Mwesigwa G, et al. Detection of persistent Plasmodium spp. infections in Ugandan children after artemether-lumefantrine treatment. Parasitology. 2014;141:1880–90. DOIPubMed
21. Calleri G, Balbiano R, Caramello P. Are artemisinin-based combination therapies effective against Plasmodium malariae? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:1447–8. DOIPubMed
22. Franken G, Müller-Stöver I, Holtfreter MC, Walter S, Mehlhorn H, Labisch A, et al. Why do Plasmodium malariae infections sometimes occur in spite of previous antimalarial medication? Parasitol Res. 2012;111:943–6. DOIPubMed
23. Smith A, Denholm J, Shortt J, Spelman D. Plasmodium species co-infection as a cause of treatment failure. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2011;9:306–9. DOIPubMed
24. Knope K, Whelan P, Smith D, Johansen C, Moran R, Doggett S, et al.; National Arbovirus and Malaria Advisory Committee. Arboviral diseases and malaria in Australia, 2010-11: annual report of the National Arbovirus and Malaria Advisory Committee. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2013;37:E1–20.PubMed
25. Ezzet F, van Vugt M, Nosten F, Looareesuwan S, White NJ. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of lumefantrine (benflumetol) in acute falciparum malaria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:697–704. DOIPubMed
26. Ashley EA, Stepniewska K, Lindegårdh N, Annerberg A, Kham A, Brockman A, et al. How much fat is necessary to optimize lumefantrine oral bioavailability? Trop Med Int Health. 2007;12:195–200. DOIPubMed
27. Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network (WWARN) AL Dose Impact Study Group. The effect of dose on the antimalarial efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine: a systematic review and pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:692–702. DOIPubMed
28. White NJ. The assessment of antimalarial drug efficacy. Trends Parasitol. 2002;18:458–64. DOIPubMed
29. Vinetz JM, Li J, McCutchan TF, Kaslow DC. Plasmodium malariae infection in an asymptomatic 74-year-old Greek woman with splenomegaly. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:367–71. DOIPubMed
30. Straimer J, Gnädig NF, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Duru V, Ramadani AP, et al. Drug resistance. K13-propeller mutations confer artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates. Science. 2015;347:428–31. DOIPubMed
31. Price RN, Uhlemann AC, van Vugt M, Brockman A, Hutagalung R, Nair S, et al. Molecular and pharmacological determinants of the therapeutic response to artemether-lumefantrine in multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:1570–7. DOIPubMed
32. Venkatesan M, Gadalla NB, Stepniewska K, Dahal P, Nsanzabana C, Moriera C, et al.; ASAQ Molecular Marker Study Group; WWARN AL. Polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter and multidrug resistance 1 genes: parasite risk factors that affect treatment outcomes for P. falciparum malaria after artemether-lumefantrine and artesunate-amodiaquine. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;91:833–43. DOIPubMed
33. Malaria GEN; MalariaGEN Plasmodium falciparum Community Project. Genomic epidemiology of artemisinin resistant malaria. Elife. 2016;5:e08714.PubMed
34. Miotto O, Amato R, Ashley EA, MacInnis B, Almagro-Garcia J, Amaratunga C, et al. Genetic architecture of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Genet. 2015;47:226–34. DOIPubMed
35. Okombo J, Abdi AI, Kiara SM, Mwai L, Pole L, Sutherland CJ, et al. Repeat polymorphisms in the low-complexity regions of Plasmodium falciparumABC transporters and associations with in vitro antimalarial responses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57:6196–204. DOIPubMed

Figures

• Figure 1. Timeline of the clinical case of a patient with Plasmodium malariae infection diagnosed and treated at Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, March–April 2015, showing the timing (A),...
• Figure 2. Analysis of the minor haplotype (H2) that caused recrudescence of Plasmodium malariae infection in a patient at Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, March–April 2015, showing distribution of...
• Figure 3. The different scenarios under which a second Plasmodium malariae infection could have occurred from the initial infection diagnosed in a patient at Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia,...

Technical Appendix

• Technical Appendix. Extended methods and additional results for case of a patient with recrudescence Plasmodium malariae infection diagnosed and treated at Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, March–April 2015.  703 KB

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2308.161582

1These authors contributed equally to this article.