jueves, 22 de septiembre de 2016

Synovial Tissue Infection with Burkholderia fungorum - Volume 22, Number 10—October 2016 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

Synovial Tissue Infection with Burkholderia fungorum - Volume 22, Number 10—October 2016 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

Volume 22, Number 10—October 2016


Synovial Tissue Infection with Burkholderia fungorum

To the Editor: The genus Burkholderia, first proposed in 1992, has now expanded to consist of many species (1). Bacteria of this genus exhibit extensive ubiquity; they have been isolated from human, animal, and environmental sources (1,2). Although rare, Burkholderia fungorum has been implicated in several human infections (24). We isolated B. fungorum from the synovial tissue of a patient’s knee.
In February 2011, a 26-year-old man had a meniscal tear on the left knee but deferred surgery. Two years later, the same knee was injured after a fall. On November 1, 2013, the patient underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. On November 28, 2013, he underwent arthroscopy because of decreased range of motion in the knee. The patient did not have a fever, and leukocyte count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were within reference range. The patient was obese but did not have diabetes, hypertension, or any autoimmune disease.
Arthroscopy indicated that the anterior cruciate ligament graft was intact. However, the synovial fluid was turbid, and synovial tissue infection was suspected. A synovial tissue biopsy was sent to the microbiology laboratory for culture. Test results for HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C infection were negative. Fungal culture was also negative. After the tissue biopsy sample was incubated on blood agar for 48 h at an ambient temperature of 37°C, 2 different colonies grew; both showed big, yellow colonies of gram-negative rods. Vitek 2 (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) identified the isolates as Pseudomonas fluorescens (91% probability) and Brucella melitensis(94% probability). Because of the possible B. melitensis infection, all excess specimens and agar plates were sealed and discarded after being autoclaved. Later DNA amplification and sequencing of the bacterial 16S rDNA identified the isolates previously identified as P. fluorescens and B. melitensis asMesorhizobium amorphae and Burkholderia fungorum (isolate BF370), respectively. The 16S rDNA sequences of BF370 (GenBank accession no. LN868266) displayed 99% similarity to B. fungorum strain DBT1 (GenBank accession no. HM113360).
Disk-diffusion tests performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute interpretive standards for Burkholderia cepacia (5) revealed that BF370 was sensitive to ceftazidime, meropenem, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Additional characterization of BF370 with multilocus sequence typing (6) revealed a novel sequence type, 868. Novel alleles were found for 7 loci: atpD (allele 347), gltB (allele 409), gyrB (allele 609), recA(allele 367), lepA (allele 418), phaC (allele 319), and trpB (allele 406). Intravenous ampicillin/sulbactam (1.5 g, 3×/d) was administered to the patient from November 29, 2013, through December 13, 2013. No pus was observed at the wound, and the patient was afebrile. He did not report discomfort, and physiotherapy commenced on day 8 after surgery.
Initial identification of the isolate as B. melitensis raised concern for possible laboratory transmission of this pathogen (7). The possibility of finding brucellae in the synovial tissue was not unexpected because Brucella spp. have been reported to cause joint infections (8). However, 16S rDNA sequencing confirmed the identity of the isolate as B. fungorum. This different finding suggests that commercial phenotypic identification system could sometimes be unreliable. The isolation of B. fungorum from the synovial tissue of this patient, however, is similar to an earlier case of leg tissue infection in a girl (3). A striking similarity shared between the isolates was their antimicrobial drug susceptibility profiles; each isolate was susceptible to ceftazidime, meropenem, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. A literature search revealed that B. fungorum had first been recovered from vaginal secretions and cerebrospinal spinal fluid of 2 women (2). However, no clinical information was presented, leading to the absence of clinical descriptions of the infections.
Recently, B. fungorum was detected in a granuloma specimen from a 26-year-old patient (4). The bacteria were suspected to have been transmitted to the patient through a rose thorn puncture. Swelling did not appear until 3 years after the initial puncture, and the patient did not report pain or fever and was otherwise healthy (4). Although the clinical implication of B. fungorum infection remained unclear, recent cases (3,4) seem to suggest that the bacteria can induce fever in young children and has a lengthy incubation period before erupting.
We suspect that the patient reported here acquired B. fungorum during his initial injury, perhaps from the environment. The concurrent isolation of M. amorphae, a plant bacterium (9), is consistent with possible environmental origin of the infection. Our observations and those reported earlier (4) suggest the ability of B. fungorum to act as a slowly replicating opportunistic pathogen associated with tissue injuries. The slow replication rate of B. fungorumpresumably mimics the growth characteristic of Burkholderia mallei, essential for the bacterium’s survival, proliferation, and evasion of host adaptive immune responses (10). Our findings suggest that an approach combining culture, 16S rDNA sequencing, and multilocus sequence typing be considered for the accurate identification of uncommon bacterial infection.
Shih Keng Loong, Yih Harng Soh1, Nur Hidayana Mahfodz, Jefree Johari, and Sazaly AbuBakarComments to Author 
Author affiliations: University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (S.K. Loong, N.H. Mahfodz, J. Johari, S. AbuBakar)University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur (Y.H. Soh)


This study was supported in part by a High Impact Research–Ministry of Higher Education Grant (no. E000013-20001), the Naval Medical Research Center–Asia, and the US Department of State, Biosecurity Engagement Program (NAMRU: J-55025-75053).


  1. Coenye TVandamme PGovan JRWLiPuma JJTaxonomy and identification of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. J Clin Microbiol.2001;39:342736.DOIPubMed
  2. Coenye TLaevens SWillems AOhlén MHannant WGovan JRWBurkholderia fungorum sp. nov. and Burkholderia caledonica sp. nov., two new species isolated from the environment, animals and human clinical samples. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol2001;51:1099107.DOIPubMed
  3. Gerrits GPKlaassen CCoenye TVandamme PMeis JFBurkholderia fungorum septicemia. Emerg Infect Dis2005;11:11157.DOIPubMed
  4. Zhang RRan YDai YYang HZhang HLu YInfectious granuloma caused by Burkholderia fungorum confirmed by laser-capture microdissection and polymerase chain reaction. Br J Dermatol2014;171:12613.DOIPubMed
  5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-fourth informational supplement (M100–S24). Wayne (PA): The Institute; 2014.
  6. Spilker TBaldwin ABumford ADowson CGMahenthiralingam ELiPuma JJExpanded multilocus sequence typing for burkholderia species. J Clin Microbiol2009;47:260710.DOIPubMed
  7. Sam ICKarunakaran RKamarulzaman APonnampalavanar SSyed Omar SFNg KPA large exposure to Brucella melitensis in a diagnostic laboratory. J Hosp Infect2012;80:3215.DOIPubMed
  8. Axford JSJoint and bone infections. Medicine2010;38:194201 .DOI
  9. Laranjo MAlexandre AOliveira SLegume growth-promoting rhizobia: an overview on the Mesorhizobium genus. Microbiol Res.2014;169:217.DOIPubMed
  10. Nierman WCDeShazer DKim HSTettelin HNelson KEFeldblyum TStructural flexibility in the Burkholderia mallei genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2004;101:1424651.DOIPubMed
Suggested citation for this article: Loong SK, Soh YH, Mahfodz NH, Johari J, AbuBakar S. Synovial tissue infection with Burkholderia fungorum [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Oct [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2210.151114
DOI: 10.3201/eid2210.151114

1Current affiliation: Hospital Kuala Lipis, Pahang, Malaysia.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario