The Effect of Assessing Genetic Risk of Prostate Cancer on the Use of PSA Tests in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Affiliations
- PMID: 32032355
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003033
Abstract
Background: Assessing genetic lifetime risk for prostate cancer has been proposed as a means of risk stratification to identify those for whom prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is likely to be most valuable. This project aimed to test the effect of introducing a genetic test for lifetime risk of prostate cancer in general practice on future PSA testing.
Methods and findings: We performed a cluster randomized controlled trial with randomization at the level of general practices (73 in each of two arms) in the Central Region (Region Midtjylland) of Denmark. In intervention practices, men were offered a genetic test (based on genotyping of 33 risk-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms) in addition to the standard PSA test that informed them about lifetime genetic risk of prostate cancer and distinguished between "normal" and "high" risk. The primary outcome was the proportion of men having a repeated PSA test within 2 years. A multilevel logistic regression model was used to test the association. After applying the exclusion criteria, 3,558 men were recruited in intervention practices, with 1,235 (34.7%) receiving the genetic test, and 4,242 men were recruited in control practices. Men with high genetic risk had a higher propensity for repeated PSA testing within 2 years than men with normal genetic risk (odds ratio [OR] = 8.94, p < 0.01). The study was conducted in routine practice and had some selection bias, which is evidenced by the relatively large proportion of younger and higher income participants taking the genetic test.
Conclusions: Providing general practitioners (GPs) with access to a genetic test to assess lifetime risk of prostate cancer did not reduce the overall number of future PSA tests. However, among men who had a genetic test, knowledge of genetic risk significantly influenced future PSA testing.
Trial registration: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01739062.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Similar articles
- Supporting Informed Decision Making for Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Testing on the Web: An Online Randomized Controlled TrialR Evans et al. J Med Internet Res 12 (3), e27. PMID 20693148. - Randomized Controlled TrialExposure to Prosdex was associated with improved knowledge about the PSA test and prostate cancer. Men who had a high level of knowledge had a less favourable attitude to …
- Effect of a Low-Intensity PSA-Based Screening Intervention on Prostate Cancer Mortality: The CAP Randomized Clinical TrialRM Martin et al. JAMA 319 (9), 883-895. PMID 29509864. - Randomized Controlled TrialAmong practices randomized to a single PSA screening intervention vs standard practice without screening, there was no significant difference in prostate cancer mortality …
- Factors Prompting PSA-testing of Asymptomatic Men in a Country With No Guidelines: A National Survey of General PractitionersFJ Drummond et al. BMC Fam Pract 10, 3. PMID 19138385.Our findings suggest that widespread PSA testing of asymptomatic men in primary care is primarily due to a combination of clinical experience, poor knowledge and the supp …
- Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet]JJ Fenton et al. PMID 30085502. - ReviewPSA screening for prostate cancer may reduce risk of prostate cancer mortality but is associated with harms including false-positive results, biopsy complications, and ov …
- Screening for Prostate CancerD Ilic et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1), CD004720. PMID 23440794. - ReviewProstate cancer screening did not significantly decrease prostate cancer-specific mortality in a combined meta-analysis of five RCTs. Only one study (ERSPC) reported a 21 …
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario