Factors That Impact Risk Management Decisions Among Women With Pathogenic Variants in Moderate Penetrance Genes Associated With Hereditary Breast Cancer
Affiliations
- PMID: 32012395
- DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1220
Abstract
There is limited information known about how women with pathogenic variants (PV) in moderate penetrance genes make decisions to manage their increased risk of breast cancer. This study analyzed factors that may impact decision-making surrounding management for increased breast cancer risk. Women with a PV in a moderate penetrance gene associated with increased risk for breast cancer were identified from an institutional database. Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted to analyze decision-making factors. Themes were developed using deductive codes based on previous literature and inductive codes based on interviewee responses. The 16 participants (mean age = 55.9 years) included 12 women with a breast cancer diagnosis. Six women (37.5%) chose bilateral mastectomy (BM), and 10 women (62.5%) chose surveillance as management. Of the 12 women with a personal history of breast cancer, four chose to have BM (33.3%). Two women without a personal history of breast cancer chose to have BM (50.0%). Transcriptions revealed seven comprehensive themes, as well as themes unique to affected and unaffected women (Cohen's kappa = 0.80). Physician opinion was the only factor present in all interviews reported to influence risk management decision-making. Several themes were consistent with prior BRCA1/BRCA2 research (family history, risk perception, sibling influence, and physician opinions). Autonomy and insurance/finances were also important factors to participants. There were certain differences in decision-making factors between affected and unaffected women, such as partner influence. Results indicate an opportunity for providers to engage their patients in a decision-making process.
Keywords: bilateral mastectomy; breast surveillance; decision-making; genetic testing; hereditary breast cancer; management outcomes; risk management.
© 2020 National Society of Genetic Counselors.
Similar articles
- BRCA1- and BRCA2-Associated Hereditary Breast and Ovarian CancerN Petrucelli et al. PMID 20301425. - ReviewGermline pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. The vast majority of individuals with a BRCA1 or BR …
- Genetic Tests for Breast and Ovarian Cancer [Internet]LK Juvet et al. PMID 29319983. - ReviewBackground Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women. In 2005, there were about 3000 incident cases of breast cancer in Norway. Ovarian canc …
- Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in BRCA Mutation Carriers: What Surgeons Need to KnowG Franceschini et al. Ann Ital Chir 90, 1-2. PMID 30872561.Aim of this paper is to allows to analyze a topic of great relevance and media interest such as the role of prophylactic mastectomy in healthy women with BRCA mutation pr …
- Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate From Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing DebateMS Piver. Oncologist 1 (5), 326-330. PMID 10388011.If instead of the title "Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer," the title were "Drug X Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from …
- Decision-making on Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Prenatal Diagnosis: A Challenge for Couples With Hereditary Breast and Ovarian CancerIA Derks-Smeets et al. Hum Reprod 29 (5), 1103-12. PMID 24603131.None of the couples who opted for PGD or conception without testing found the use of PND, with possible pregnancy termination, acceptable. PND users chose this method bec …
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario