lunes, 23 de diciembre de 2019

A cross-sectional study of patients referred for HNF1B-MODY genetic testing due to cystic kidneys and diabetes. - PubMed - NCBI

A cross-sectional study of patients referred for HNF1B-MODY genetic testing due to cystic kidneys and diabetes. - PubMed - NCBI



 2019 Dec 11. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12959. [Epub ahead of print]

A cross-sectional study of patients referred for HNF1B-MODY genetic testing due to cystic kidneys and diabetes.

Author information


1
Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
2
Department of Pediatrics, Diabetology, Endocrinology, and Nephrology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
3
Department of Clinical Genetics, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
4
Department of Pediatrics, Oncology and Hematology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
5
Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Patients referred for HNF1B testing present very heterogeneous phenotypes. Despite suggestive characteristics, many do not harbor mutations in HNF1B.

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate the clinical characteristics of probands referred for HNF1B genetic testing through a nationwide monogenic diabetes screening programme.

SUBJECTS:

Probands tested for HNF1B mutations in the 2005-2018 period (N=50) were identified in the Polish Monogenic Diabetes Registry, which prospectively recruits primarily pediatric patients and their families on a nationwide scale.

METHODS:

Variants that had been reported pathogenic were reassessed using criteria of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). A structured medical interview was performed with all available individuals, their parents, and/or their physicians. For each patient, HNF1B-score was calculated based on available clinical information.

RESULTS:

The study group numbered 36 unrelated probands (28% lost to follow-up): 14 with pathogenic or likely-pathogenic variants in HNF1B, one with a variant of uncertain significance and 21 negative for HNF1B mutations. Presence of cystic kidneys (OR=9.17, 95%CI:1.87-44.92), pancreatic abnormalities (OR=15, 95%CI:1.55-145.23), elevated liver enzymes (OR=15, 95%CI:1.55-145.23) best discriminated HNF1B-positive cases from the negative ones. Presence of impaired glucose tolerance coupled with kidney disease in the proband and one parent was also highly predictive for HNF1B mutations (OR=11.11, 95%CI:1.13-109.36). HNF1B-score with recommended cut-off distinguished patients with and without HNF1B findings with 100% sensitivity and 47.6% specificity. Addition of four clinical variables to select patients based on HNF1B-score improved specificity to 71.4% (95%CI:47.8%-88.7%) whilst retaining 100% sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS:

Detailed medical interview may enable more accurate patient selection for targeted genetic testing. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

KEYWORDS:

Cystic kidneys; Diabetes Mellitus; Genetic testing; MODY; Phenotype

PMID:
 
31825128
 
DOI:
 
10.1111/pedi.12959

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario