Misconceptions surrounding HPV are causing women to miss smear tests
A survey conducted by Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust has found that a “concerning” level of misunderstanding and stigma surrounding human papilloma virus could be putting women off going for life-saving cervical smear tests.
Naeblys | Shutterstock
The survey, which included more than 2,000 women, found that 40% were concerned a positive result would mean their partner had been unfaithful, 40% were worried about what others may think of them having the virus and two-thirds would be worried it meant they had cancer.
The charity’s chief executive Robert Music says the level of misunderstanding surrounding HPV must be addressed:
HPV is an infection that is spread through vaginal, anal or oral sex and close skin-to-skin contact. Eighty percent of women encounter the virus at some point in their lifetime, but it is usually harmless and cleared by the immune system without causing any symptoms.
There are hundreds of strains of HPV, but only very few women who transmit one of the two high-risk strains will go on to develop cancer.
Of the women who completed the survey, only 15% realised how common HPV infection is. One-third were unaware of the link between HPV and cervical cancer and the majority were unaware that it could cause throat and mouth cancer.
It is hoped that by addressing the level of misunderstanding and stigma surrounding HPV, more women will take up their invite to have a test and turn up to their appointment.
Screening women for HPV will mean those at risk can be identified at an early stage and prioritised for further tests if necessary.
The NHS will soon roll out a new cervical cancer screening regime that is expected to reduce the number of women diagnosed each year by one-fifth. The new regime tests for HPV first, rather than the abnormal changes to cells caused by infection with the virus, which is the current approach.
HPV screening would also mean that women who are categorized as low risk could safely be checked once every every five years rather than every three, as is the current standard.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario