Volume 24, Number 4—April 2018
Imipenem Resistance in Clostridium difficile Ribotype 017, Portugal
Clostridium difficile, a toxin-producing, spore-forming bacillus, is a main cause of nosocomial antimicrobial drug–associated diarrhea in industrialized countries (1). C. difficile infection (CDI) usually develops in previously hospitalized persons with a recent history of antimicrobial drug use and causes illness with symptoms ranging from mild diarrhea to potentially lethal pseudomembranous colitis (2). Antimicrobial drugs disrupt the protective gut microbiota, enabling ingested C. difficile spores to germinate in the colon and providing a selective advantage to nonsusceptible strains (3). CDI is mainly mediated by the TcdA and TcdB toxins, though some strains additionally produce a binary toxin. Multiple antimicrobial drugs can promote CDI, and cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones have been associated with a higher risk for CDI (3). Multidrug resistance is frequently found in epidemic C. difficilestrains; determinants of resistance are often found in horizontally transferable mobile genetic elements (4). In past decades, CDI prominence has increased because of a sudden rise in outbreaks and an increase in disease severity and death (5). This shift was mainly associated with the dissemination of fluoroquinolone-resistant PCR ribotype (RT) 027, which has been responsible for hospital outbreaks worldwide. Strains of other ribotypes, including RT078 and RT017, which have enhanced virulence, have emerged (6). In particular, RT017, the most common toxin A–negative, toxin B–positive ribotype, is widespread in Asia and is common in Europe (7–9). In a pan-European study of ≈900 C. difficile strains, the overall rate of resistance to imipenem, an antimicrobial drug of the carbapenem class, currently widely used as a last-line drug to treat infections by gram-negative bacteria, was found to be 7.41%, and the geometric mean (GM) MIC of imipenem for RT017 strains was 5.91 mg/L (8). In another study, isolates collected in a South Korea hospital during 2000–2009 were analyzed, and a resistance rate to imipenem of 8% (12% among RT017 isolates) was found (10).
We characterized 191 C. difficile isolates collected during September 2012–September 2015 from 15 hospitals in Portugal (Technical Appendix[PDF - 375 KB - 7 pages]). We found 24 (12.6%) were resistant to imipenem. Of these 24 isolates, 22 were RT017, 1 was RT014, and 1 was RT477. The MIC for imipenem for RT017, the imipenem-resistant isolates, was >32 mg/L (Table 1); the MIC for the 2 non-RT017 isolates was 16 mg/L. The 22 imipenem-resistant RT017 isolates were found at hospital A throughout the study period, suggesting the existence of a persistent clone, a finding supported by whole-genome sequencing data (Technical Appendix[PDF - 375 KB - 7 pages]). Among the 25 RT017 isolates, 3 were imipenem-susceptible and from hospital B (MIC range 1.5–3 mg/L) (Table 1).
RT017 C. difficile strains are frequently resistant to clindamycin, erythromycin, moxifloxacin, tetracycline, or rifampin (individually or in combination) (8,10). In this study, the 22 RT017 imipenem-resistant isolates were also found to be resistant to all of these antimicrobial drugs and showed higher meropenem and ertapenem MICs than those of the RT017 imipenem-susceptible isolates (Table 1; Technical Appendix[PDF - 375 KB - 7 pages]; Technical Appendix[PDF - 375 KB - 7 pages] Figure). Multidrug resistance to noncarbapenem antimicrobial drugs correlated with the presence of several genetic determinants, many located in mobile genetic elements (Figure 1; online Technical Appendix), in line with the idea that multidrug-resistant strains have a selective advantage (4) and that horizontal gene transfer plays a major role in the evolution of this pathogen (11).
Through whole-genome sequencing, we found 13 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that differentiated the imipenem-resistant and imipenem-susceptible RT017 isolates (Table 2; Figure 1; Technical Appendix[PDF - 375 KB - 7 pages]). We found 2 SNPs in the genes coding for 2 high molecular weight (HMW) penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) (Figure 1). HMW PBPs, which are bifunctional enzymes containing transglycosylase and transpeptidase domains, are categorized into class A, and PBPs lacking the transglycosylase domain are categorized into class B. The transpeptidase domain harbors 3 functional motifs (SXXK, SXN, and KTG[T/S]) that comprise the active site. Carbapenems block cell wall synthesis by inhibiting transpeptidase activity (12). One of the mutations found in the imipenem-resistant isolates affected the gene coding for PBP1, the single class A bifunctional peptidoglycan synthase of C. difficile; the mutation resulted in the amino acid substitution Ala555Thr close to the SSN functional motif (Figure 2). The second mutation was found in the gene encoding for the PBP3 class B transpeptidase and caused the amino acid replacement Tyr721Ser between the SXN and KTGT motifs (Figure 2). Neither of these changes was found in the 3 imipenem-susceptible RT017 isolates (Figure 1). Moreover, the 2 non-RT017 imipenem-resistant isolates, with a MIC for imipenem lower than that of the RT017 isolates, revealed either the Ala555Thr change or a different substitution (Leu543His), both in PBP1, also close to the functional motif SXN (Table 2). Modified PBPs with reduced affinity for the antimicrobial drug have been associated with resistance to β-lactams and specifically to imipenem in several microorganisms (12). We found no differences between the imipenem-resistant and imipenem-susceptible RT017 isolates in genes encoding other peptidoglycan synthases (Figure 1). It is possible that the substitutions in PBP1 and PBP3 in RT017 confer high-level resistance to imipenem and reduced susceptibility to other carbapenems, and at least in the RT014 and RT477 isolates studied, the single Ala555Thr substitution (or other substitutions in the vicinity of the SXN motif) is sufficient for an intermediate level of resistance.
However, all RT017 isolates studied herein, as well as the previously annotated strains M68 (GenBank accession no. NC_017175) and BJ08 (accession no. CP003939), have a fifth HMW class B PBP, PBP5, encoded in a mobile element (Technical Appendix[PDF - 375 KB - 7 pages]). Whether PBP5 contributes to imipenem resistance remains to be determined. Moreover, in imipenem-resistant isolates, the key sporulation-specific gene sigK, which is contiguous to pbp2, is interrupted by the 17-kb skincd element (13), and the pbp5 region is contiguous to a transposon-like element carrying the ermB gene (shown as PUBMLST allele 8; https://pubmlst.org/bigsdb?db=pubmlst_cdifficile_seqdef&page=alleleInfo&locus=ermB&allele_id=8). It is unknown whether these genetic differences contribute to imipenem resistance.
Imipenem resistance in C. difficile RT017 probably involves the acquisition of mutations in both pbp1 and pbp3 that lead to amino acid substitutions close to the functional motifs of their transpeptidase domains. These substitutions might decrease the affinity of PBP1 and PBP3 for imipenem, enabling peptidoglycan synthesis in the presence of the antimicrobial drug. Considering that the presence of an additional PBP (PBP5) is a characteristic of RT017 strains, we suggest that PBP5 facilitates the expression of imipenem resistance through acquisition of mutations in pbp1and pbp3. In strains of other ribotypes lacking PBP5, such as the RT014 and RT477 isolates herein described, mutations in pbp1 might only lead to intermediate levels of resistance. We further suggest that the spreading of pbp5 might contribute to the dissemination of high-level imipenem-resistance.
Portugal has a high rate of healthcare-associated infections and is a major consumer of carbapenems (1). Although carbapenem consumption has not been directly linked to C. difficile resistance, we speculate that the emergence of resistance and reduced susceptibility to these antimicrobial drugs might recapitulate the scenario observed with fluoroquinolone-resistant RT027 in the United States, where fluoroquinolones were the most prescribed antimicrobial drug (14). Our findings further reinforce the need for the responsible use of antimicrobial drugs; the emergence of carbapenem resistance in multidrug-resistant C. difficile clones might result in the dissemination of resistant strains.
Dr. Isidro is a fellow in the Reference Laboratory for Gastrointestinal Infections at the National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge in Lisbon, Portugal. Her primary research interests include CDI, antibiotic resistance, molecular typing, and whole-genome sequencing.
We thank the participating hospitals for providing samples for the laboratory surveillance of CDI.
This work was supported by the National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge (grant no. 2016DDI1284). We also acknowledge grant Pest-C/EQB/LA0006/2011 from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT; http://www.fct.pt) and program Investigador FCT (IF/00268/2013/CP1173/CT0006 to M.S.). A.L.M. was supported by a PhD fellowship (PD/BD/105738/2014) from the FCT.
- European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Point prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use in European acute care hospitals, 2011–2012. Stockholm: The Centre; 2013.
- Smits WK, Lyras D, Lacy DB, Wilcox MH, Kuijper EJ. Clostridium difficile infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16020.
- Slimings C, Riley TV. Antibiotics and hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: update of systematic review and meta-analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69:881–91.
- Spigaglia P. Recent advances in the understanding of antibiotic resistance in Clostridium difficile infection. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2016;3:23–42.
- Gerding DN, Lessa FC. The epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection inside and outside health care institutions. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29:37–50.
- Freeman J, Bauer MP, Baines SD, Corver J, Fawley WN, Goorhuis B, et al. The changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23:529–49.
- King AM, Mackin KE, Lyras D. Emergence of toxin A-negative, toxin B-positive Clostridium difficile strains: epidemiological and clinical considerations. Future Microbiol. 2015;10:1–4.
- Freeman J, Vernon J, Morris K, Nicholson S, Todhunter S, Longshaw C, et al.; Pan-European Longitudinal Surveillance of Antibiotic Resistance among Prevalent Clostridium difficile Ribotypes’ Study Group. Pan-European longitudinal surveillance of antibiotic resistance among prevalent Clostridium difficile ribotypes. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:248.e9–16.
- Santos A, Isidro J, Silva C, Boaventura L, Diogo J, Faustino A, et al. Molecular and epidemiologic study of Clostridium difficile reveals unusual heterogeneity in clinical strains circulating in different regions in Portugal. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:695–700.
- Lee JH, Lee Y, Lee K, Riley TV, Kim H. The changes of PCR ribotype and antimicrobial resistance of Clostridium difficile in a tertiary care hospital over 10 years. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63:819–23.
- He M, Sebaihia M, Lawley TD, Stabler RA, Dawson LF, Martin MJ, et al. Evolutionary dynamics of Clostridium difficile over short and long time scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:7527–32.
- Zapun A, Contreras-Martel C, Vernet T. Penicillin-binding proteins and β-lactam resistance. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2008;32:361–85.
- Serrano M, Kint N, Pereira FC, Saujet L, Boudry P, Dupuy B, et al. A recombination directionality factor controls the cell type-specific activation of σK and the fidelity of spore development in Clostridium difficile. PLoS Genet. 2016;12:e1006312.
- He M, Miyajima F, Roberts P, Ellison L, Pickard DJ, Martin MJ, et al. Emergence and global spread of epidemic healthcare-associated Clostridium difficile. Nat Genet. 2013;45:109–13.