martes, 8 de noviembre de 2016

MercatorNet: After the family, what? | MercatorNet

After the family, what?

After the family, what?

Why we have a political crisis and how to solve it.
Carolyn Moynihan | Nov 8 2016 | comment 

At this moment the minds of Americans – and much of the world – are focused on what comes after the election. But a weekend column by Ross Douthat of the New York Times put a more important question in front of readers: what came before the election that has made it a uniquely fraught and controversial one?
This is a question that has been posed in hundreds of ways during the past year, but Douthat’s answer goes to the heart of the matter: the family. In a society where family trees are tapering and thinning, he says, where a diminishing number of people experience family life as their main source of belonging and security, politics must provide a “Great Protector” -- at this moment either “a feisty grandmother or fierce sky father”.
Whichever of them wins the election, the basic problem will stay the same. The fundamental unit of society is eroding, breeding new anxieties and dependencies as well as a new “tribalism” seen particularly in white identity politics, and threatening many, as they age, with a future of deep loneliness.
No-one can deny the basic facts of Douthat’s case: fewer marriages, smaller families and more people living for longer stretches on their own. But his readers are not buying his conclusions. To judge by the top billing comments among almost 500, the family is not that big a deal. Perhaps that is what we might expect from The Times’ most avid followers, but one feels in this instance most are just missing the point.
The central point is this:
Human beings imagine and encounter the future most intensely through our own progeny, our flesh and blood. The Constitution speaks of “our posterity” for a reason: We are a nation of immigrants, but when people think about the undiscovered America of the future, its strongest claim on them is one their own descendants make.
What a sad, narrow view of the world and of the future. Only my blood kin can make me care about the promise of the future? Only my blood kin can take care of me when and if I need it?objects Catherine F. And, another woman adds: As for the idea that people do not care about the future of the country or world if they do not have biological descendants, a piece of themselves, going forward: that is a very narrow view of human's capacity to care for it is very selfish.
Well, it would be, if that is what Douthat said or meant, but he did not.
Of course, even in the most fertile societies there are people who do not found families, but they generally participate in family life in some way and have an emotional stake in the progeny of their relatives. The vast majority of those who are parents, however, will surely agree that the strongest (not the only) claim on their generosity and ingenuity is the one that their own children and future progeny make.
To affirm this is not to advocate families of 10 (though certainly not to denigrate them either), a “return to the 1950s”, patriarchal culture and women tied to the kitchen sink; or to harbour racist attitudes (not enough whites) and not care about the state of the environment – all things with which Douthat is charged.
Nor is it to deny that many parents today, especially the more educated, invest a tremendous amount in the upbringing of their few children; and that even the middle class face formidable odds in financing a home, education and healthcare for their families, as well as keeping their jobs, let alone seeing their kids settled in one – things stressed by many respondents to the column.
It is merely to acknowledge that the family is the basic cell of the body politic and that when it is healthy and strong, the community and the nation will be healthier and stronger. And let’s not forget that there is strength in numbers; a child growing up with siblings – as well as his or her own mother and father – stands to learn civic virtues more easily than otherwise.
When women in America are having less than two children on average (1.88), when 40 percent of the nation’s births are to women without the security of marriage, when nearly one in three women in their early thirties has no children and more are saying they do not want children at all, individual families may be strong but one cannot say that of family culture in general. And this is the case throughout the Western world.
Isn’t it time for citizens to stop looking to a party or a president to protect them and their families, and to reclaim the power of the small community in which we first learn to receive and give and care about our neighbour? Is there really any other way to renew political culture than to renew our own, and reverse the post-familial revolution?
Carolyn Moynihan is deputy editor of MercatorNet.MercatorNet
Tuesday is almost over in Sydney, but in the United States it has barely begun. Voters in the tiny New Hampshire town of Dixville Notch sent encouraging news to Hillary Clinton. Four of its eight voters backed her; two backed Donald Trump, one the Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, and one Mitt Romney (a write-in). But there are many hours to go before the polls close in Hawaii. 
Two years ago, most of us thought that this would be an expensive but lacklustre contest between Mrs Clinton (who else?) and a conventional GOP stalwart. But voters ignored the professional politicians and chose the extraordinary figure of Trump. Why? Journalists, historians and sociologists will be asking that question for years to come. Has the United States really changed or was this bitter, spiteful, emotion-driven campaign an anomaly?
In a very insightful analysis, MercatorNet's deputy editor, Carolyn Moynihan says No. The election reflects the dynamics of the changing American family, she argues. How could one possibly think that shrinking the basic cell of society and trashing marriage would leave politics unaffected? 

Michael Cook 

After the family, what?
By Carolyn Moynihan
Why we have a political crisis and how to solve it.
Read the full article
It’s almost all over!
By Marcus Roberts
This blog can't escape that election...
Read the full article
The hand on the button
By William Stearman
Why a conservative Republican is voting for Hillary Clinton
Read the full article
On the eve of the election
By Sheila Liaugminas
Talk is bubbling up about potential legal challenges over results.
Read the full article
Christian racism? Election years bring dangerous creatures from the shadows
By Denyse O'Leary
The alt-right is peddling some bizarre theories
Read the full article
The myth of the disappearing book
By Andrea Ballatore and Simone Natale
E-book sales are beginning to fall.
Read the full article
The overwhelming power of small things
By Karl D. Stephan
Household devices connected to the internet are responsible for a gigantic attack on major websites
Read the full article
The overlooked fatherless: one donor-conceived woman’s story
By Alana S. Newman
Children need to know and be known by their natural mother and father.
Read the full article
Powerful financial interests involved in UK pre-natal testing
By Peter Saunders
90% of Down syndrome babies are aborted. A new test will increase this.
Read the full article
Conversations unplugged
By Juliana Weber
We have to learn again how to talk to one another, says Sherry Turkle.
Read the full article
Births outside marriage decline in U.S.
By Shannon Roberts
The trend is largely due to higher immigrant births.
Read the full article

MERCATORNET | New Media Foundation 
Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George Street, North Strathfied NSW 2137, Australia 

Designed by elleston
New Media Foundation | Suite 12A, Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario