Amye Kenall, Associate Publisher from BioMed Central co-authored an article in eLifeon how open science can help researchers succeed. The article reviews literature demonstrating that open research is associated with increases in citations, media attention, potential collaborators, job opportunities, and funding opportunities. The findings are evidence that open research practices bring significant benefits to researchers relative to more traditional closed practices.
Point of view: How open science helps researchers succeed
National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico; National Institutes of Health, United States; University of California, Davis, United States; Laura and John Arnold Foundation, United States; BioMed Central, United Kingdom; CrossRef, United Kingdom; University of Texas at Austin, United States; Center for Open Science, United States; University of California, Berkeley, United States; University of Virginia, United States; Mozilla Foundation,United States; Gesmer Updegrove LLP, United States; Washington State University, United States; University of Washington, United States
Abstract
Open access, open data, open source and other open scholarship practices are growing in popularity and necessity. However, widespread adoption of these practices has not yet been achieved. One reason is that researchers are uncertain about how sharing their work will affect their careers. We review literature demonstrating that open research is associated with increases in citations, media attention, potential collaborators, job opportunities and funding opportunities. These findings are evidence that open research practices bring significant benefits to researchers relative to more traditional closed practices.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario