miércoles, 17 de agosto de 2016

Community-Acquired Clostridium difficile Infection, Queensland, Australia - Volume 22, Number 9—September 2016 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

Community-Acquired Clostridium difficile Infection, Queensland, Australia - Volume 22, Number 9—September 2016 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

Volume 22, Number 9—September 2016


Community-Acquired Clostridium difficile Infection, Queensland, Australia

To the Editor: In Queensland, Australia, a steady increase in community-acquired (CA) Clostridium difficileinfections (CDI) during 2003–2012 could not be explained by patients’ demographic characteristics or environmental factors (1). Several risk factors have been implicated in the increased rates of CA-CDI, primarily exposure to antimicrobial drugs, gastric acid–suppression drugs, and corticosteroids (2). Given the recent rise in prescription of corticosteroids and proton pump inhibitors in Australia, we hypothesized that the observed increase in CA-CDI was associated with increased drug prescriptions.
To test our hypothesis, we analyzed a subset of data used in a previous study (1), which included fecal samples from patients seen by general practitioners in the community from January 2008 through December 2012. The samples were submitted to Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology (Taringa, Queensland, Australia) for C. difficile toxin gene detection. After samples submitted from healthcare facilities and nursing homes were excluded, the final dataset contained data from 14,330 fecal samples. We aggregated the data by patient sex, age categories, year, and statistical area level 4 (SA4). For each sex-age-year-SA4 group, we used as numerators the numbers of CA-CDI cases identified and as denominators the numbers of samples submitted for microbiological testing.
The Australian Department of Human Services provided data from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. The quantities of 11 anatomic therapeutic chemical drugs were accessed by patient sex, age group, year, and SA4. Corresponding with the CA-CDI data, medication data to be analyzed were then aggregated by sex, age group, year, and SA4.
For each medication, we built binomial logistic regression models, using CA-CDI status as the outcome, in a Bayesian framework, incorporating fixed effects for sex, age group, quantity of drug prescribed, year (2008–2012), and spatially unstructured random effects at the SA4 level. After performing an initial burn-in, we stored and summarized 1,000 values from the posterior distribution of each parameter by using descriptive statistics (posterior mean, 95% posterior credible interval [95% CrI], and p value). We examined multiple pairwise comparisons of CA-CDI and medication exposure; thus, we used the Holm adjustment for p values to avoid α inflation and to control the familywise error rate.
Of the 14,330 fecal samples tested, 1,430 (10%) were positive for C. difficile. The proportion of positive fecal samples increased over the 5-year period, from 7.10% in 2008 to 12.72% in 2011 and 11.48% in 2012 (p<0.001). After adjusting the regression models for sex, age group, temporal pattern, and spatial distribution, we found that exposure to antimycobacterial drugs (odds ratio [OR] 1.09; 95% CrI 1.02–1.16) and anthelmintic drugs (OR 1.07; 95% CrI 1.01–1.13) were associated with increased odds of CA-CDI. After post hoc Holm adjustments, no statistically significant association between medication exposure and CA-CDI was observed (Table).
Our findings suggest that the increase in CA-CDI proportion was not associated with population-level medication exposure in Queensland during 2008–2012. CA-CDI epidemiology in Queensland might be driven by a group of factors other than medication exposure, such as transmission of the pathogen from food, animals, or hospitals into the community. Studies have confirmed the risk for foodborne and animalborne spread of C. difficile into the community (3). In Australia and New Zealand, importation of onions and garlic from the United States and Mexico might be responsible for increased CDI cases during Southern Hemisphere summers (4), and high prevalence of C. difficile colonization in piglets has been identified (5). However, the role of these factors in leading to CA-CDI cases remains unknown.
A recent contact tracing study in the United Kingdom demonstrated that a considerable proportion of CDIs among patients in healthcare settings originated from the community (6); this finding was supported by another study, which showed that in Queensland, more than two thirds of patients with CA-CDI required hospitalization (7). Currently, there is no evidence of a reverse-infection route (healthcare-acquired CDI being transmitted to persons in the community). However, Sethi et al. documented environmental shedding of C. difficile by inpatients for several weeks after resolution of symptoms (8). Therefore, the possibility that asymptomatic patients might be a source of transmission after hospital discharge needs to be examined. In recent years, epidemiologic models exploring the role of CDI coming from the community into the hospital have become increasingly popular (9); however, to the best of our knowledge, only 1 modeling study described CDI dynamics within the wider community (10). Although this approach is innovative, we acknowledge some limitations. Medication exposure was used as a proxy, based on the average prescription in the community, and it cannot be applied to the individual patient. In addition, we were unable to adjust the regression model for the presence of concurrent medical conditions and other unmeasured confounders.
Exposure to medications, particularly antimicrobial drugs, probably influences CA-CDI pathogenesis (2). However, our community-based assessment indicates that a more holistic exploration is needed to identify alternative factors driving increases in CA-CDI cases in the wider population.
Luis Furuya-KanamoriComments to Author , Laith Yakob, Thomas V. Riley, David L. Paterson, Peter Baker, Samantha J. McKenzie, Jenny Robson, and Archie C.A. Clements
Author affiliations: The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia (L. Furuya-Kanamori, A.C.A. Clements)London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK (L. Yakob)The University of Western Australia and PathWest Laboratory Medicine, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia (T.V. Riley)The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia (D.L. Paterson, P. Baker)The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia (S.L. McKenzie)Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology, Taringa, Queensland, Australia (J. Robson)


L.F.-K. is funded by an Endeavour Postgraduate Scholarship (no. 3781_2014), an Australian National University Higher Degree Scholarship, and a Fondo para la Innovación, Ciencia y Tecnología Scholarship (no. 095-FINCyT-BDE-2014). A.C.A.C. is funded by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Senior Research Fellowship (no. 1058878).


  1. Furuya-Kanamori LRobson JSoares Magalhaes RJYakob LMcKenzie SJPaterson DLA population-based spatio-temporal analysis of Clostridium difficile infection in Queensland, Australia over a 10-year period. J Infect2014;69:44755DOIPubMed
  2. Furuya-Kanamori LStone JCClark JMcKenzie SJYakob LPaterson DLComorbidities, exposure to medications, and the risk of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2015;36:13241DOIPubMed
  3. Songer JGTrinh HTKillgore GEThompson ADMcDonald LCLimbago BMClostridium difficile in retail meat products, USA, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis2009;15:81921DOIPubMed
  4. Riley TClostridium difficile infection: the Australian experience. 2013 [cited 2016 Mar 1]. http://www.hqsc.govt.nz/assets/Infection-Prevention/CDI-workshop-Feb-2013-Riley.pdf
  5. Knight DRSquire MMRiley TVNationwide surveillance study of Clostridium difficile in Australian neonatal pigs shows high prevalence and heterogeneity of PCR ribotypes. Appl Environ Microbiol2015;81:11923DOIPubMed
  6. Walker ASEyre DWWyllie DHDingle KEHarding RMO’Connor LCharacterisation of Clostridium difficile hospital ward–based transmission using extensive epidemiological data and molecular typing. PLoS Med2012;9:e1001172DOIPubMed
  7. Huber CAHall LFoster NFGray MAllen MRichardson LJSurveillance snapshot of Clostridium difficile infection in hospitals across Queensland detects binary toxin producing ribotype UK 244. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep2014;38:E27984.PubMed
  8. Sethi AKAl-Nassir WNNerandzic MMBobulsky GSDonskey CJPersistence of skin contamination and environmental shedding of Clostridium difficile during and after treatment of C. difficile infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2010;31:217DOIPubMed
  9. Yakob LRiley TPaterson DClements AClostridium difficile exposure as an insidious source of infection in healthcare settings: an epidemiological model. BMC Infect Dis2013;13:376DOIPubMed
  10. Yakob LRiley TVPaterson DLMarquess JSoares Magalhaes RJFuruya-Kanamori LMechanisms of hypervirulent Clostridium difficile ribotype 027 displacement of endemic strains: an epidemiological model. Sci Rep2015;5:12666DOIPubMed


Suggested citation for this article: Furuya-Kanamori L, Yakob L, Riley TV, Paterson DL, Baker P, McKenzie SJ, et al. Community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection, Queensland, Australia [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Sep [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2209.151115

DOI: 10.3201/eid2209.151115

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario