If you don’t have a strong stomach, you are allowed to skip what follows and proceed directly to the article links below.
Earlier this month the New York Post, a great source of bioethical conundrums, reported the strange case of 30-year-old North Carolina woman Jewel Shuping.
Ms Shuping is convinced that she was always meant to be blind. But by some terrible accident at birth, she had normal eyesight. “I really feel this is the way I was supposed to be born, that I should have been blind from birth,” Shuping explained. Doctors say that she has Body Integrity Identity Disorder.
Finally she found an obliging psychologist in 2006. After giving her some counselling, he gave her some eye-numbing drops and then washed her pupils with drain cleaner. “It hurt, let me tell you,” she says in a YouTube video. “My eyes were screaming and I had some drain cleaner going down my cheek burning my skin,” she said. “But all I could think was, ‘I am going blind, it is going to be okay.”
So here is the bioethical conundrum: was the psychologist right to destroy his patient’s eyesight if she freely requested it, was happy with the treatment, and was living in psychological torment because she could see?
And if he was wrong and unethical, why is participating in gender reassignment surgery or euthanasia right and ethical?
Michael Cook
Editor
BioEdge
Editor
BioEdge
| This week in BioEdge | |
by Xavier Symons | Oct 31, 2015
The Chinese government has finally abandoned its notorious one-child policy.by Michael Cook | Oct 31, 2015
Severe conditions placed on Philip Nitschke's registrationby Michael Cook | Oct 31, 2015
Trial of Nicolas Bonnemaison sparks controversyby Michael Cook | Oct 31, 2015
Are bioethicists a spineless lot?by Michael Cook | Oct 31, 2015
A new paper claims that induced stem cells are functionally equivalent to embryonic stem cellsby Xavier Symons | Oct 31, 2015
A doctor in Belgium could be charged with murder after euthanizing an 85-year-old woman suffering from depression.by Michael Cook | Oct 30, 2015
A new film highlights the controversial experiments by Stanley Milgramby Daniel Callahan and Xavier Symons | Oct 28, 2015
Daniel Callahan is one of the most influential thinkers in contemporary bioethics. Recently he spoke with BioEdge about the state of the discipline.BioEdge
Suite 12A, Level 2 | 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | Australia
Phone: +61 2 8005 8605
Mobile: 0422-691-615
Email: michael@bioedge.org
New Media Foundation | Level 2, 5 George St | North Strathfield NSW 2137 | AUSTRALIA | +61 2 8005 8605
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario