GLP Weekly: Why the spat between low-carbers and calorie-counters is pointless; Greenpeace-funded study of gene-edited crops backfires; and more!

GLP Features Articles by GLP staff and contributors

Viewpoint: Greenpeace-funded study backfires, undermining case to treat gene-edited crops as GMOs Mary Mangan Cut carbs? Eat less, move more? Why the spat between low carbers and calorie counters is pointless Angela Dowden Pesticide evolution: Can natural chemicals help battle insects, weeds and disease without harming the planet? John Cumbers It’s not going away: We need a real, non-political debate about the best way to live with COVID or countries will fracture Danny Dorling New England Journal of Medicine sets aside 200 years of politics, editorializing FDA and CDC have been compromised, calling political leadership ‘dangerously incompetent’ NEJM Viewpoint: ‘Heavy’ pesticide exposure linked to cardiovascular disease? Flawed study raises ‘troubling’ questions about public health research Geoffrey Kabat Podcast: From Philadelphia to Baltimore—Tales of Chromosomes, Cancer Cells and Henrietta Lacks Kat Arney Conspiracy promoter Mike ‘Health Ranger’ Adams built online disinformation Natural News online empire that subverts science, report finds Cameron English, Jon Entine Podcast: GM crops don’t change your DNA; Monsanto ‘owns’ global food supply? South American anti-biotech invasion Cameron English, Kevin Folta Viewpoint: The choosiness myth — Why are there fewer women in science? Gina Rippon