Association of Premenopausal Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy With Breast Cancer Risk in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers: Maximising Bias-Reduction
Affiliations
- PMID: 32325420
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.03.009
Abstract
Background: Whether risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in BRCA1/2 carriers reduces the breast cancer (BC) risk is conflicting, potentially due to methodological issues of prior analysis. We analysed the association between premenopausal RRSO and BC risk in BRCA1/2 carriers after adjusting for potential biases.
Methods: We analysed data from 444 BRCA1 and 409 BRCA2 carriers under age 51 with no cancer prior to genetic testing or during first 6 months of surveillance (to avoid cancer-induced testing bias and prevalent-cancer bias). Observation started 6 months after genetic testing (to avoid event-free time bias), until BC diagnosis, risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) or death. A multistate model with four states (non-RRSO, RRSO, RRM and BC) and five transitions was fitted to characterise outcomes and to calculate the BC risk reduction after premenopausal RRSO (before age 51). A systematic review was performed to assess the association between premenopausal RRSO and BC.
Results: During a mean follow-up of 4.3 years, 96 women (11.3%) developed BC (54 BRCA1, 42 BRCA2). The risk of BC after premenopausal RRSO decreased significantly in BRCA1 carriers (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.45 [95% confidence interval (CI):0.22-0.92]), but was not conclusive in BRCA2 carriers (HR = 0.77 [95%CI:0.35-1.67]). The systematic review suggested that premenopausal RRSO is associated with a decrease of BC risk in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers.
Conclusions: Premenopausal RRSO was associated with BC risk reduction in BRCA1 carriers, which can help guide cancer risk-reducing strategies in this population. Longer follow-up and larger sample size may be needed to estimate the potential benefit in BRCA2 carriers.
Keywords: BRCA1/2; Breast cancer risk; Multi-state model; Risk reduction methodology; Salpingo-oophorectomy; Systematic review.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest statement The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Similar articles
- Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 24;8(8):CD012464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012464.pub2.PMID: 30141832 Free PMC article. Review.
- Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, natural menopause, and breast cancer risk: an international prospective cohort of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.Breast Cancer Res. 2020 Jan 16;22(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13058-020-1247-4.PMID: 31948486 Free PMC article.
- Breast cancer risk after salpingo-oophorectomy in healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: revisiting the evidence for risk reduction.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Mar 18;107(5):djv033. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv033. Print 2015 May.PMID: 25788320
- Cost-effectiveness of surveillance and prevention strategies in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.Breast Cancer. 2018 Mar;25(2):141-150. doi: 10.1007/s12282-017-0803-y. Epub 2017 Oct 10.PMID: 29019095
- Hormone replacement therapy after prophylactic risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: A meta-analysis.Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018 Dec;132:111-115. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Oct 3.PMID: 30447915 Review.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario