domingo, 23 de febrero de 2020

Novel Techniques for Detection of Mycobacterium bovis Infection in a Cheetah - Volume 26, Number 3—March 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Novel Techniques for Detection of Mycobacterium bovis Infection in a Cheetah - Volume 26, Number 3—March 2020 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Issue Cover for Volume 26, Number 3—March 2020

Volume 26, Number 3—March 2020
Research Letter

Novel Techniques for Detection of Mycobacterium bovis Infection in a Cheetah

Tanya J. Kerr, Rachiel Gumbo, Wynand J. Goosen, Peter Rogers, Robert D. Last, and Michele A. MillerComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa (T.J. Kerr, R. Gumbo, W.J. Goosen, M.A. Miller)Provet Wildlife Services, Hoedspruit, South Africa (P. Rogers)VetDiagnostix, Veterinary Pathology Services, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa (R.D. Last)

Abstract

In South Africa, bovine tuberculosis threatens some of Africa’s most iconic wildlife species, including the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus). The lack of antemortem diagnostic tests for this species strongly hinders conservation efforts. We report use of antemortem and postmortem diagnostic assays to detect Mycobacterium bovis infection in a cheetah.
Charismatic carnivore species such as the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) are considered a priority within conservation areas. However, the global population of cheetahs is decreasing; they are classified as vulnerable to extinction by the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List of Threatened Species (1). Infectious diseases, such as bovine tuberculosis, pose a threat to wild carnivore populations, especially those that are small and fragmented (2). Bovine tuberculosis, caused by Mycobacterium bovis, affects multiple wildlife species in South Africa. Although fatal M. bovis infection has been described in a cheetah in Greater Kruger National Park, South Africa (3), reports of antemortem diagnosis in this species in South Africa have not been published. We report use of antemortem and postmortem diagnostic assays to detect M. bovis infection in a cheetah.
The study protocol was approved by the Stellenbosch University Research Ethics Committee (protocol no. SU-ACU-2019–10286). In January 2019, an adult female cheetah from a breeding center showed signs of chronic pneumonia. A positive test result was observed for an intradermal comparative cervical tuberculin test, based on the protocol described for African lions (Panthera leo) (4).
Thereafter, blood was collected for additional immunologic tests, including the CXCL9 gene expression assay (GEA) and the Dual Path Platform (DPP) Vet TB Serologic Assay (Chembio Diagnostic Systems, Inc., http://chembio.comExternal Link). The use of these assays have been reported for African lions (5,6). In brief, we performed the CXCL9 GEA by adding whole blood into QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus tubes (QIAGEN, https://www.qiagen.comExternal Link) and incubating for 24 hours at 37°C. We stabilized whole blood cell pellets by using RNALater Solution (Ambion, https://www.thermofisher.comExternal Link), after which we extracted RNA by using the RiboPure Blood Kit (Ambion) and reverse transcribed this RNA by using the Quantitect Reverse Transcription Kit (QIAGEN). We performed quantitative PCR as described for lions (5). Using previously determined cutoff values calculated for lions, we interpreted the mycobacterial peptide-specific response for the cheetah as CXCL9 GEA positive (2–ΔΔCq = 90.09; cutoff value >27).
In addition, we tested serum by using a commercial DPP serologic assay (6). We detected antibodies to the antigen MBP83 (relative light units = 52.5, cutoff value >5). On the basis of these antemortem test results, the cheetah was suspected to be infected with M. bovis and was euthanized.
The postmortem examination and histopathologic findings showed a severe multifocal to coalescent, necrotizing, caseous, granulomatous bronchopneumonia. Lung tissues were processed for mycobacterial culture, and culture isolates were genetically speciated by using genomic regions of difference PCR and spoligotyping, as described (7,8). Using this approach, we confirmed that the cheetah was infected with M. bovis isolate SB0121, a strain commonly found in Greater Kruger National Park.
We also detected M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC) DNA in lung tissues before mycobacterial culture results were obtained by using the GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra Assay (Cepheid, https://www.cepheid.comExternal Link) (9). GeneXpert PCR machines are widely available in numerous human tuberculosis clinics and laboratories across South Africa to enable rapid identification of human MTBC infections (9). Therefore, this tool might also be useful for MTBC diagnosis in wildlife if samples can be taken to these clinics.
Within the borders of South Africa, most cheetahs are found in fragmented populations, resulting in development of an actively managed metapopulation, which is currently composed of 60 reserves (V. van der Merwe, Endangered Wildlife Trust, pers. comm., 2019 Nov 8). The primary goal of the metapopulation is to maintain genetic diversity by translocating animals between reserves. One of the current challenges facing cheetah conservation is quarantine and restricted movement of cheetahs from premises that have known M. bovis–infected species present. Because movement of cheetahs from these populations requires tuberculosis testing, the lack of antemortem diagnostic tests, which can distinguish between M. bovis–infected and uninfected animals, strongly hinders conservation efforts.
Although tuberculosis diagnostic tests for other species rely predominantly on detection of the adaptive immune response of the host, only a few studies investigated immunoassays for wild felids (6). In this instance, the tuberculin skin test response was key to promoting further investigation. The decision to use the lion CXCL9 GEA for this cheetah was based on its previously reported sensitivity of 87.5% for lions (10) and the assumption that various cytokine mRNA transcripts were homologous between wild felid species. This assumption was strongly supported when it appeared to be an accurate indicator of M. bovis infection after confirmation by mycobacterial culture. In addition, the DPP serologic assay detected a strong antibody response to M. bovis antigen MPB83 during antemortem screening of this cheetah. Because these findings are limited to 1 case, further investigation in a larger cohort is required before drawing conclusions about the ability of these diagnostic assays to discriminate between M. bovis–infected and uninfected cheetahs.
In conclusion, novel antemortem immunoassays (CXCL9 GEA and DPP) and a postmortem PCR (GeneXpert Ultra) appear to be promising tools for detection of M. bovis infection in cheetahs. Tests that can accurately identify M. bovis–infected cheetahs are crucial to supporting conservation efforts and tuberculosis control.
Dr. Kerr is a postdoctoral researcher in the Animal TB Research Group at Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. Her primary research interest is developing tools with diagnostic potential for tuberculosis detection in wildlife species including large felids (African lion, leopard, and cheetah), African elephants, and various antelope species.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by the South African Medical Research Council, the National Research Foundation, South African Research Chair Initiative (SARChI grant no. 86949), and the Stellenbosch University Faculty of Medicine and Health Science.

References

  1. Durant  SMitchell  NIpavec  AGroom  RAcinonyx jubatus, cheetah. In: The IUCN red list of threaten species. Version 2019–2 [cited 2019 Jun 6]. https://www.iucnredlist.orgExternal Link
  2. Higgitt  RLLouis van Schalkwyk  Ode Klerk-Lorist  L-MBuss  PECaldwell  PRossouw  Let al. Mycobacterium bovis infection in African wild dogs, Kruger National Park, South Africa. Emerg Infect Dis2019;25:14257DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  3. Keet  DFKriek  NPPenrith  MLMichel  AHuchzermeyer  HTuberculosis in buffaloes (Syncerus caffer) in the Kruger National Park: spread of the disease to other species. Onderstepoort J Vet Res1996;63:23944.PubMedExternal Link
  4. Keet  DFMichel  ALBengis  RGBecker  Pvan Dyk  DSvan Vuuren  Met al. Intradermal tuberculin testing of wild African lions (Panthera leo) naturally exposed to infection with Mycobacterium bovis. Vet Microbiol2010;144:38491DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  5. Olivier  TTViljoen  IMHofmeyr  JHausler  GAGoosen  WJTordiffe  ASWet al. Development of a gene expression assay for the diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in African lions (Panthera leo). Transbound Emerg Dis2017;64:77481DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  6. Miller  MABuss  PSylvester  TTLyashchenko  KPdeKlerk-Lorist  L-MBengis  Ret al. Mycobacterium bovis in free-rangng lions (Panthera leo): evaluation of serological and tuberculin skin tests for detection of infection and disease. J Zoo Wildl Med2019;50:715DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  7. Goosen  WJMiller  MAChegou  NNCooper  DWarren  RMvan Helden  PDet al. Agreement between assays of cell-mediated immunity utilizing Mycobacterium bovis-specific antigens for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer). Vet Immunol Immunopathol2014;160:1338DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  8. Kamerbeek  JSchouls  LKolk  Avan Agterveld  Mvan Soolingen  DKuijper  Set al. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol1997;35:90714DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  9. Chakravorty  SSimmons  AMRowneki  MParmar  HCao  YRyan  Jet al. The New Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra: improving detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and resistance to rifampin in an assay suitable for point-of-care testing. MBio2017;8:112DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  10. Sylvester  TTMartin  LERBuss  PLoxton  AGHausler  GARossouw  Let al. Prevalence and risk factors for Mycobacterium bovis infection in African lions (Panthera leo) in the Kruger National Park. J Wildl Dis2017;53:3726DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2603.191542
Original Publication Date: 2/4/2020

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario