sábado, 18 de agosto de 2018

Symptomatic Dengue during Pregnancy and Congenital Neurologic Malformations - Volume 24, Number 9—September 2018 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Symptomatic Dengue during Pregnancy and Congenital Neurologic Malformations - Volume 24, Number 9—September 2018 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC





Volume 24, Number 9—September 2018

Research Letter

Symptomatic Dengue during Pregnancy and Congenital Neurologic Malformations

Tables

Altmetric

    Article has an altmetric score of 25

Article Metrics

Citations:

Views:Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

Metric Details
Enny S. PaixãoComments to Author , Maria Glória Teixeira, Maria da Conceição N. Costa, Mauricio L. Barreto, and Laura C. Rodrigues
Author affiliations: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom (E.S. Paixão, L.C. Rodrigues)Instituto de Saúde Coletiva, Salvador-Bahia, Brazil (E.S. Paixão, M.G. Teixeira, M. da Conceição N. Costa, M.L. Barreto)Center of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Salvador-Bahia (M.L. Barreto, L.C. Rodrigues)

Abstract

Dengue virus infection during pregnancy increased the risk for any neurologic congenital anomaly in the infant by roughly 50% and for other congenital malformations of brain 4-fold. Our results show an association between dengue during pregnancy and congenital anomalies of the brain, suggesting that flaviviruses other than Zika virus are associated with such malformations.
Before the causal relationship between Zika virus and neurologic congenital anomalies (1), especially microcephaly (2), was established, no evidence associated flavivirus with congenital malformations in humans, although postnatal complications have been described (3). We investigated whether dengue virus (DENV) infection during pregnancy could be associated with neurologic defects in the infant at birth.
We conducted a population-based study using routinely collected data from live births and from women who were notified and confirmed to have DENV infection during 2006–2012 in Brazil, before the introduction of Zika virus. We probabilistically linked records of mothers of live births with records of dengue notification to identify women who were reported as having dengue during pregnancy. We excluded records with missing or implausible names, multiple pregnancies, and births in municipalities with no dengue notifications. We obtained ethics approval from Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil (CAAE: 26797814.7.0000.5030) and from London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (Ethics Ref:10269).
In the matching process, we used name, age, and place of residence of the mother at time of delivery and notification. We included only links and nonlinks with a high degree of certainty. We validated the linkage process in a study that demonstrated 62% sensitivity (4).
We used an outcome definition of congenital malformation of the nervous system coded as Q00-Q07 in International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10). We defined dengue as a confirmed case of DENV infection notified during a pregnancy that resulted in a live birth. We estimated the association between symptomatic dengue during pregnancy and neurologic congenital malformations using the Firth method to reduce the small sample bias in maximum-likelihood estimation.
The study parameters encompassed 16,103,312 live births. Neurologic congenital anomalies are rare; they occurred in 13,634 (0.08%) live births. Dengue during pregnancy increased the odds of a neurologic congenital anomaly by 50% (Table), but this result was not statistically significant (95% CI 0.97–2.27). We split the neurologic congenital defects into ICD-10 categories; the 95% CI around the estimated odds ratios (ORs) was not statistically significant in 7 categories, including microcephaly (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.33–8.32). Two other types of neurologic congenital anomalies were >4 times more frequent in women who had DENV infection during pregnancy: other congenital malformations of spinal cord (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.0–26.9) and other congenital malformations of brain (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.7–11.3, which was statistically significant). We found no sign of space-time clusters or recording errors suggestive of a coding artifact in the 4 records of other congenital malformations of brain wherein the mother had DENV infection (Technical AppendixTable)
Symptoms of DENV infection occurred in the first trimester in 50% of patients. The specific diagnosis of those among the nonexposed group were congenital malformation of corpus callosum (9%; 81/943), holoprosencephaly (24%; 225/943), and septooptic dysplasia (0.6%; 6/943).
Our study showed an association between DENV infection during pregnancy and congenital anomalies of the brain. Congenital anomalies of the brain detectable by routine examination at birth are so rare (6/100,000 live births by our data) that it was necessary to assemble a cohort of >16 million live births to detect an effect of dengue; even then, we did not have sufficient power to confidently exclude associations with other neurologic abnormalities.
Because DENV infection had not been associated with congenital anomalies, there is no established biologic mechanism for its teratogenicity. However, there is evidence for postnatal neurotropism and virus isolation from brain tissue (5) and for dengue virus crossing the blood–brain and placental barriers (6,7). The pattern of anomalies we described has similarities with congenital Zika syndrome. Brain images and autopsies from infants with Zika and other infectious diseases have revealed abnormalities similar to those we described (8,9).
Our study has limitations inherent to the linkage process. Rigorous evaluation of the linkage process showed that it is unlikely to introduce bias and that it did not affect the magnitude of the association (4). Another potential limitation was diagnosis of DENV infection. In notifiable epidemics, not all cases are tested after the cause is established. DENV infection in Brazil is notified for the presence of clinical criteria, laboratory confirmation, or both. Only ≈30% of notified DENV infections are laboratory confirmed, which could lead to bias if unconfirmed cases are not dengue. However, a previous article found no difference in pregnancy outcomes for women with notified DENV infection with and without laboratory confirmation (10). We did not control for potential confounders, so confounders such as maternal illness or environmental exposures may have contributed to the association between dengue infection and neurologic malformations.
The association of symptomatic dengue during pregnancy and congenital anomalies of the brain in the infant, while not as high frequency as the linkage with Zika, opens the possibility of other flaviviruses causing congenital malformations and raises questions about policy implications. We recommend careful observation and recording of DENV infection in antenatal records and full investigation of live births with neurologic malformations, as well as animal and in vitro research of teratogenic effects of dengue.
Ms. Paixão is a PhD student at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Her main research interests are congenital infections and use of routinely collected data.
 Top

Acknowledgments

E.S.P. is funded by the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq), Brazil, and L.C.R. is partially funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Zika-PLAN grant agreement No. 734584. The funders of this study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.
Author a contributions: E.S.P. carried out the analysis and wrote the first draft of the article. L.C.R. and M.G.T. conceived the study. M.de C.N.C. and M.L.B. contributed to the study design and interpretation. All authors revised the manuscript and approved the final version.
 Top

References

  1. Rasmussen  SAJamieson  DJHonein  MAPetersen  LRZika virus and birth defects—reviewing the evidence for causality. N Engl J Med2016;374:19817DOIPubMed
  2. de Araújo  TVBRodrigues  LCde Alencar Ximenes  RAde Barros Miranda-Filho  DMontarroyos  URde Melo  APLet al.investigators from the Microcephaly Epidemic Research GroupBrazilian Ministry of HealthPan American Health OrganizationInstituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando FigueiraState Health Department of PernambucoAssociation between Zika virus infection and microcephaly in Brazil, January to May, 2016: preliminary report of a case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis2016;16:135663DOIPubMed
  3. John  CCCarabin  HMontano  SMBangirana  PZunt  JRPeterson  PKGlobal research priorities for infections that affect the nervous system. Nature2015;527:S17886DOIPubMed
  4. Paixão  ESHarron  KAndrade  KTeixeira  MGFiaccone  RLCosta  MDCNet al. Evaluation of record linkage of two large administrative databases in a middle income country: stillbirths and notifications of dengue during pregnancy in Brazil. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2017;17:108DOIPubMed
  5. Carod-Artal  FJWichmann  OFarrar  JGascón  JNeurological complications of dengue virus infection. Lancet Neurol2013;12:90619DOIPubMed
  6. Chaturvedi  UCDhawan  RKhanna  MMathur  ABreakdown of the blood-brain barrier during dengue virus infection of mice. J Gen Virol1991;72:85966DOIPubMed
  7. Castanha  PMSBraga  CCordeiro  MTSouza  AISilva  CD JrMartelli  CMet al. Placental transfer of dengue virus (DENV)–specific antibodies and kinetics of DENV infection-enhancing activity in Brazilian infants. J Infect Dis2016;214:26572DOIPubMed
  8. Martines  RBBhatnagar  Jde Oliveira Ramos  AMDavi  HPIglezias  SDKanamura  CTet al. Pathology of congenital Zika syndrome in Brazil: a case series. Lancet2016;388:898904DOIPubMed
  9. Nunes  MLCarlini  CRMarinowic  DNeto  FKFiori  HHScotta  MCet al. Microcephaly and Zika virus: a clinical and epidemiological analysis of the current outbreak in Brazil. J Pediatr (Rio J)2016;92:23040DOIPubMed
  10. Paixão  ESCosta  MDCNTeixeira  MGHarron  Kde Almeida  MFBarreto  MLet al. Symptomatic dengue infection during pregnancy and the risk of stillbirth in Brazil, 2006-12: a matched case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis2017;17:95764DOIPubMed
 Top

Table

 Top
Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2409.170361
Original Publication Date: 7/23/2018

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario