Fluids and sepsis: changing the paradigm of fluid therapy: a case report

Hori HariyantoEmail author,
Corry Quando Yahya,
Monika Widiastuti,
Primartanto Wibowo and
Oloan Eduard Tampubolon

Journal of Medical Case Reports201711:30

DOI: 10.1186/s13256-016-1191-1

Received: 28 October 2016

Accepted: 27 December 2016

Published: 4 February 2017

Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Over the past 16 years, sepsis management has been guided by large-volume fluid administration to achieve certain hemodynamic optimization as advocated in the Rivers protocol. However, the safety of such practice has been questioned because large-volume fluid administration is associated with fluid overload and carries the worst outcome in patients with sepsis. Researchers in multiple studies have declared that using less fluid leads to increased survival, but they did not describe how to administer fluids in a timely and appropriate manner.

Case presentation

An 86-year-old previously healthy Sundanese man was admitted to the intensive care unit at our institution with septic shock, acute kidney injury, and respiratory distress. Standard care was implemented during his initial care in the high-care unit; nevertheless, his condition worsened, and he was transferred to the intensive care unit. We describe the timing of fluid administration and elaborate on the amount of fluids needed using a conservative fluid regimen in a continuum of resuscitated sepsis.

Conclusions

Because fluid depletion in septic shock is caused by capillary leak and pathologic vasoplegia, continuation of fluid administration will drive intravascular fluid into the interstitial space, thereby producing marked tissue edema and disrupting vital oxygenation. Thus, fluids have the power to heal or kill. Therefore, management of patients with sepsis should entail early vasopressors with adequate fluid resuscitation followed by a conservative fluid regimen.