Volume 25, Number 1—January 2019
Dispatch
Identification of Lonepinella sp. in Koala Bite Wound Infections, Queensland, Australia
On This Page
Holly Angela Sinclair
, Paul Chapman, Lida Omaleki, Haakon Bergh, Conny Turni, Patrick Blackall, Lindsey Papacostas, Phillip Braslins, David Sowden, and Graeme R. Nimmo
, Paul Chapman, Lida Omaleki, Haakon Bergh, Conny Turni, Patrick Blackall, Lindsey Papacostas, Phillip Braslins, David Sowden, and Graeme R. NimmoAbstract
We report 3 cases of koala bite wound infection with Lonepinella koalarum–like bacteria requiring antimicrobial and surgical management. The pathogens could not be identified by standard tests. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA and housekeeping genes identified the genus. Clinicians should isolate bacteria and determine antimicrobial susceptibilities when managing these infections.
Lonepinella koalarum, a species present in koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) feces, is a gram-negative bacterium that can degrade tannin protein complexes (1). This bacterium is the only species of the genus Lonepinella, a member of the family Pasteurellaceae. L. koalarum–related strains have been identified in koala gingiva (2). We report 3 cases of human wound infection involving Lonepinella-like organisms occurring after koala bites in Queensland, Australia.
In 2014, case-patient 1, a 69-year-old female wildlife worker from the Sunshine Coast region of Queensland, Australia, sought treatment for left wrist puncture wounds and a 2-cm laceration to the dorsum of her left hand after a koala bite. The wound was cleaned, and oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was administered. Increased erythema and edema developed after 48 hours. Surgical debridement was required, and intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam was given for 6 days, followed by oral trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole; full recovery was achieved. A Gram stain revealed gram-positive and -negative organisms. After 48 hours of culturing, we identified Staphylococcus sciuri and 2 gram-negative coccobacilli (MS14434 and MS14435).
After this case, we reviewed records and found a similar previous incident. In 2012, case-patient 2, a 62-year-old male wildlife worker from Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia, went to a general practitioner for treatment of a koala crush-bite injury to the thumb. After increased pain, swelling, fever, and malaise developed, he sought hospital care. He had an open wound (2-mm long, 5–8-mm wide, 20-mm deep) with purulent discharge. Surgical debridement was required, and intravenous ticarcillin/clavulanic acid was administered for 4 days, followed by oral amoxicillin/clavulanic acid for 7 days; clinical improvement occurred. We cultured specimens obtained during the operation and found Fusobacterium nucleatum, Staphylococcus aureus, and an unidentifiable gram-negative bacillus (MS14436).
In 2015, case-patient 3, a 66-year-old woman from Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, sought hospital treatment for a koala bite wound on her right hand. Surgical debridement and washout revealed pus within the thenar muscle compartment and metacarpophalangeal joint. Intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam was given, and the patient’s condition improved. We cultured swabs of specimens acquired before and during surgery and isolated an unidentified gram-negative bacillus (MS14437).
We cultured all isolates on chocolate agar in 5% CO2 for 48 h and recorded growth in different culture conditions (Table 1). We performed biochemical reactions, sugar utilization, and cultures using in-house methods and commercial identification products API 20NE Microbial Identification Kit (bioMérieux, https://www.biomerieux.com/), RapID NH System (Remel, http://www.remel.com/Clinical/Microbiology.aspx), RapID ANA II System (Remel), and VITEK 2 GN and NH ID cards (bioMérieux). We performed matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry using the VITEK MS IVD database (bioMérieux) and performed antimicrobial susceptibility tests per the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines (http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/) for Pasteurella multocida (3). We used Etest (bioMérieux) to determine MICs.
We performed DNA amplification and sequencing of 16S rRNA (4), rpoB (5), recN (6), and infB (7) genes as previously published and deposited sequences in GenBank (AppendixTable 3). We used Geneious 10.0.6 (https://www.geneious.com) to align and analyze sequences. We performed a neighbor-joining analysis of 16S rRNA sequences by using Jukes-Cantor corrections and calculated bootstrap support in MEGA version 6 (https://www.megasoftware.net). We calculated the similarity matrix using MUSCLE (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/muscle) and predicted genome relatedness using a previously published formula using the recN gene (8,9).
The colony morphology of the 2 isolates from case-patient 1 were distinctly different from each other; MS14434 was morphologically similar to MS14437, and MS14435 was similar to MS14436. Optimal colony growth was seen on chocolate agar with 5% CO2 and under microaerophilic conditions (Table 1). Results from commercial identification systems were mostly inconsistent (Appendix Table 1); note that L. koalarum is not included within the commercial databases used.
The MICs of all the antimicrobial drugs tested for MS14434 and MS14435 were low (Appendix Table 2); MICs for MS14436 and MS14437 were higher. MS14436 and MS14437 were resistant to benzylpenicillin when applying P. multocida breakpoints (3).
Figure. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences of 4 clinical isolates obtained from koala bite wound infections in 3 persons (MS14434–7), Queensland, Australia, 3 Lonepinella koalarum ACM isolates, and members...
We compared 16S rRNA and rpoB gene sequences from our isolates with those available in public databases, including GenBank, but confident organism identification was not possible. The 16S rRNA phylogenetic analysis clustered all 4 isolates distantly from L. koalarum (ACM 3666), albeit within the same group (Figure).
For the rpoB gene sequence, an identity of 85%–88% for genera and 95% for species has been suggested for Pasteurellaceae (2,10,11). All isolates of this study had an identity of >95% for the rpoB gene of ACM 3666 (Table 2), indicating a close genetic relationship with L. koalarum. A minimum level of 83%–85% identity of the partial infB gene has been shown between members of the Pasteurellaceae family at the genus level (12). The partial infB gene sequence of MS14434 had a high similarity (99.78%) to the corresponding sequence in ACM 3666, and the partial infB genes of the other 3 isolates are at the lower limit of the 83%–85% threshold. These 3 isolates also shared <85% similarity with the recN gene of ACM 3666 and >99% similarity with the recN gene of each other. The recN gene of MS14434 had 97.17% similarity with that of ACM 3666. Using the recN similarity index (8), we are 95% confident that these 3 isolates are a species other than L. koalarum within the genus Lonepinella, and MS14434 is most likely L. koalarum.
Each case manifested with purulent skin and soft tissue infection requiring surgical washout and debridement, similar to infections linked to Pasteurella in dog and cat bite wounds (13). MICs of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, third-generation cephalosporins, and ciprofloxacin were low for all isolates. MIC determination should be sought because 2 isolates were nonsusceptible to benzylpenicillin on the basis of P. multocida interpretation criteria (3). For resolution of infection, surgical drainage might be required in addition to antimicrobial drug therapy.
In the original study of L. koalarum (1), 7 isolates were grouped into 4 biovars (a–d), and 16S rRNA sequencing demonstrated high similarity (97.6%–99.8%). A threshold of 93%–94% identity between 16S rRNA gene sequences has been described for differentiating members of Pasteurellaceae at the genus level (5) and >97% at the species level (10). Although all 4 isolates in our study showed >93% similarity to L. koalarum ACM 3666 in their 16S rRNA genes, none of them reached 97% similarity. Both infB and recN gene sequences indicated a close relationship between MS14434 and ACM 3666; however, 16S rRNA and rpoB gene sequences showed the same level of similarity between all 4 isolates and the reference L. koalarum strain. This disagreement between genes could be a result of lateral gene transfer; lateral gene transfer of housekeeping genes has been described as a reason for incongruence between 16S rRNA and housekeeping gene phylogeny (14).
Clinical and microbiological suspicion is required when assessing bacteria from koala bite wounds. Phenotypic and biochemical colony characteristics are often unreliable at assigning isolates to a genus and species within the Pasteurellaceae family, and identification with commercial kits is not always possible. Pasteurellaceae spp., including L. koalarum, can be identified by using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry with updated spectra (15). Clinical laboratory identification methods involve sequencing the 16S rRNA gene and searching nucleotide databases. As seen in this investigation, this approach can be inconclusive, and phylogenetic analysis of sequences including housekeeping genes might be required.
In summary, Lonepinella infections acquired after koala bites can cause clinically significant human skin and soft tissue disease. In this report, we identified possibly novel Lonepinella-like organisms with a combination of genetic analyses.
Dr. Sinclair is an advanced trainee in microbiology and infectious diseases with the Royal College of Pathologists Australasia and Royal Australasian College of Physicians. Her primary research interests include bacteriology, Aeromonas identification and infection, antimicrobial resistance, and phylogenetics.
Acknowledgment
We thank Scott A. Beatson and Leah Roberts for their scientific support.
References
- Osawa R, Rainey F, Fujisawa T, Lang E, Busse HJ, Walsh TP, et al. Lonepinella koalarum gen. nov., sp. nov., a new tannin-protein complex degrading bacterium. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1995;18:368–73. DOI
- European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 5.0. 2015 Jan 1 [cited 2017 Aug 15]. http://www.eucast.org/mic_distributions_and_ecoffs/
- Dendle C, Looke D. Review article: Animal bites: an update for management with a focus on infections. Emerg Med Australas. 2008;20:458–67.PubMed
Figure
Tables
Cite This ArticleOriginal Publication Date: 12/11/2018
.png)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario