Minimizing surgery for melanoma that has spread | National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Minimizing surgery for melanoma that has spread | National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Minimizing surgery for melanoma that has spread

At a Glance

• In people with melanoma that has spread to a lymph node, immediately removing all nearby lymph nodes may not extend life.
• These findings may change how surgeons make decisions about the initial extent of surgery for people with melanoma. 

Standard practice when melanoma has spread to at least one lymph node has been that all lymph nodes nearby are immediately removed. Megaflop/iStock/Thinkstock

Melanoma is the most serious type of skin cancer. It’s more likely than others to invade nearby tissues and spread. It can spread to lymph nodes, which are part of the immune system, and then to other parts of the body through lymph vessels. If cancer is found in any lymph nodes, therapy choices may be more aggressive.

When melanoma is diagnosed, doctors perform a sentinel lymph node biopsy. The patient receives an injection of a tracking compound near the tumor. The substance flows through lymph vessels to the nearest lymph node or nodes. These are the nodes most likely to have cancer. The surgeon removes only the nodes with the tracking substance.

If lab tests don’t detect cancer cells in a sentinel lymph node, then no more surgery is needed. If cancer cells are found, the standard recommendation has been to remove the rest of the lymph nodes in that cluster. Removing a cluster of lymph nodes in the neck, underarm, groin, or other areas can cause side effects. Lymph fluid can build up in nearby tissues, causing long-term swelling and pain. Removing only the sentinel lymph nodes rather than a cluster of lymph nodes greatly reduces the chance of side effects.

The ability of cancer cells to move and spread depends on structures such as podosomes (yellow), shown here in melanoma cells. Julio C. Valencia/NCI Center for Cancer Research

 

Researchers launched a study to find out whether immediately removing the cluster of nearby nodes enabled patients with a cancer-containing sentinel node to live longer than those having only the sentinel node removed. The international study, conducted at 63 centers, was led by Dr. Mark Faries at the John Wayne Cancer Institute in Santa Monica, California. Faries is now with the Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, an affiliate of Cedars-Sinai. The study was supported in part by NIH’s National Cancer Institute (NCI). Results appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine on June 8, 2017.

The researchers recruited more than 1,900 patients after their sentinel lymph nodes were removed and showed cancer. The patients did not have clinical evidence of other lymph node involvement. They were randomly divided into two groups. The immediate surgery group had the cluster of remaining nodes in the area immediately removed. For the observation group, the cluster of remaining nearby lymph nodes was removed only if clinical signs of cancer appeared there later on during a follow-up exam.

The analysis showed that the immediate surgery group did not live longer than the observation group. The findings suggest that there is no significant life-extending benefit to removing the entire cluster of lymph nodes at the time of sentinel lymph node biopsy.

“The new findings likely will result in many fewer of these procedures being performed around the world,” Faries says. “The results also will likely affect the design of many current and future clinical trials of medical therapies in melanoma.”

—Geri Piazza

Related Links

• How UV Radiation Triggers Melanoma
• A Genomic Survey of Melanoma
• Less Invasive Surgery Just as Effective for Some Breast Cancer Patients
• Keep Your Skin Healthy: Protecting Your Outer Self
• Sun and Skin: The Dark Side of Sun Exposure
• Melanoma Treatment (PDQ®)–Patient Version
• Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
• Cancer Stat Facts: Melanoma of the Skin

References: Completion Dissection or Observation for Sentinel-Node Metastasis in Melanoma. Faries MB, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, Andtbacka RH, Mozzillo N, Zager JS, Jahkola T, Bowles TL, Testori A, Beitsch PD, Hoekstra HJ, Moncrieff M, Ingvar C, Wouters MWJM, Sabel MS, Levine EA, Agnese D, Henderson M, Dummer R, Rossi CR, Neves RI, Trocha SD, Wright F, Byrd DR, Matter M, Hsueh E, MacKenzie-Ross A, Johnson DB, Terheyden P, Berger AC, Huston TL, Wayne JD, Smithers BM, Neuman HB, Schneebaum S, Gershenwald JE, Ariyan CE, Desai DC, Jacobs L, McMasters KM, Gesierich A, Hersey P, Bines SD, Kane JM, Barth RJ, McKinnon G, Farma JM, Schultz E, Vidal-Sicart S, Hoefer RA, Lewis JM, Scheri R, Kelley MC, Nieweg OE, Noyes RD, Hoon DSB, Wang HJ, Elashoff DA, Elashoff RM. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2211-2222. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1613210. PMID: 28591523.

Funding: NIH’s National Cancer Institute (NCI); Borstein Family Foundation; Amyx Foundation; Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation; and John Wayne Cancer Institute Auxiliary.