domingo, 20 de noviembre de 2016

Reemergence of St. Louis Encephalitis Virus, California, 2015 - Volume 22, Number 12—December 2016 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

Reemergence of St. Louis Encephalitis Virus, California, 2015 - Volume 22, Number 12—December 2016 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

Volume 22, Number 12—December 2016

Dispatch

Reemergence of St. Louis Encephalitis Virus, California, 2015

Gregory S. White1, Kelly Symmes1, Pu Sun, Ying Fang, Sandra Garcia, Cody Steiner, Kirk Smith, William K. Reisen, and Lark L. CoffeyComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District, Indio, California, USA (G.S. White)School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California (K. Symmes, P. Sun, Y. Fang, S. Garcia, C. Steiner, W.K. Reisen, L.L. Coffey)Environmental Services Department, Maricopa County, Phoenix, Arizona, USA (K. Smith)

Abstract

St. Louis encephalitis virus infection was detected in summer 2015 in southern California after an 11-year absence, concomitant with an Arizona outbreak. Sequence comparisons showed close identity of California and Arizona isolates with 2005 Argentine isolates, suggesting introduction from South America and underscoring the value of continued arbovirus surveillance.
St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV; family Flaviviridae, genus Flavivirus) was recognized in California in 1937 and caused periodic epidemics in humans and equines until 1989, including a 1984 outbreak in Los Angeles (13). Even though US epidemics have not occurred since 1989, SLEV activity was documented continually in California until 2003, the year West Nile virus (WNV) activity was detected in the state. During 2003–2015, no SLEV activity was detected in California despite ongoing SLEV surveillance and a 6-fold statewide increase in mosquito pool testing in response to the invasion of WNV. The absence of SLEV activity suggested its elimination from California (4,5).
In Arizona, SLEV has been detected less frequently than in California, with low enzootic activity reported most years during 1972–2006 (Arizona State Public Health Laboratory, unpub. data) and a single human case during 2010–2014 (6). In Maricopa County, which includes Phoenix, a human SLEV outbreak during July–October 2015 resulted in 23 confirmed cases and 1 death (Arizona State Public Health Laboratory, unpub. data).
Beginning in July 2015, SLEV activity was detected in mosquito pools, and sentinel chicken seroconversions were detected in the Coachella Valley in Riverside County, California. Given the reemergence of SLEV in California and Arizona in summer 2015, the purpose of this study was to describe the temporal and spatial detection of SLEV in California, compare its circulation intensity with that of WNV in California in 2015, and define the genetic relatedness of SLEV from both states to SLEV from elsewhere to infer a possible origin and pattern of spread.

The Study

Thumbnail of St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) and West Nile virus (WNV) surveillance in mosquitoes and sentinel chickens in Coachella Valley, Riverside County, California, USA, 2015. A) Vector abundance (upper panel) from the same locations in all of Riverside County at bimonthly intervals during 2010–2014 (gray line) and in 2015 (black line), and infection rates for WNV (middle) and SLEV (lower) based on maximum likelihood estimates (black lines) with 95% CI (gray shading) in female Culex ta
Figure 1. St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) and West Nile virus (WNV) surveillance in mosquitoes and sentinel chickens in Coachella Valley, Riverside County, California, USA, 2015. A) Vector abundance (upper panel) from the...
Mosquito and arbovirus surveillance was conducted in the Coachella Valley in 2015 (Figure 1, panel A). SLEV RNA was first detected in a pool of Culex tarsalis mosquitoes by quantitative reverse transcription PCR on July 28, 2015, and subsequently in 37 more pools of the same species through October 6 (7). The number of SLEV-positive pools peaked at 23 during the first 2 weeks of August. WNV was detected in mosquitoes during April–November 2015, with a peak in the week of June 21. Although SLEV was detected only in Cx. tarsalis pools, WNV RNA was detected in 83 Cx. quinquefasciatus pools during April 24–November 5 and in 16 Cx. tarsalis pools during May 19–September 29. During the period of co-detection of both viruses (July–November), peak minimum infection rates were higher for WNV than for SLEV.
Vector abundance did not parallel peak infection rates (June for WNV and August for SLEV). Instead, vector abundance in 2015 was lower at most times than the 5-year average, calculated as the geometric mean of female Cx. tarsalis and Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes collected bimonthly in traps at the same locations during 2010–2014 (8). The trend of decreasing mosquito abundance in midsummer in southern California (especially in the Coachella Valley), concurrent with increasing arbovirus activity, has been well documented (9). This trend most likely relates to changes in age structure, with progressively more parous female mosquitoes tested as overall vector population numbers decline. Sentinel chicken seroconversion to SLEV, detected by enzyme immunoassay and confirmed by plaque-reduction neutralization test, was detected during August 28–November 9, with a total of 9 seroconversions in 104 chickens (8.7% seropositive) (10,11). WNV seropositive chicken serum samples were also reported starting on August 28, but with fewer (n = 6 [5.7%] of serum specimens tested) seroconversions to WNV than to SLEV.
Although most mosquito pools contained detectable RNA for only WNV or SLEV, 4 pools tested positive for both viruses. Both viruses were circulating in the summer of 2015 at the north and west shores of the Salton Sea in the Coachella Valley (Figure 1, panel B). SLEV activity was more focal than WNV activity and was limited to Cx. tarsalis mosquitoes collected in a 20-km radius near wetlands and agricultural habitats by the Salton Sea, whereas WNV activity spanned >80 km and was concentrated in Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes collected in more densely populated residential habitats in the central part of the Coachella Valley. Co-circulation of both viruses in ecologically diverse habitats near the Salton Sea at the same time shows that early-season WNV activity did not preclude later SLEV circulation.
Thumbnail of St. Louis encephalitis virus phylogeny with 2015 California (USA CA) and 2014 and 2015 Arizona (USA AZ) genomes (black circles). Complete nucleotide genomes (except for isolate 2282, which included only the E gene) were compared by using a neighbor-joining algorithm and 1,000 bootstrap replicates (support numbers at nodes) by using MEGA 7 (14). Isolates are named according to location, year of isolation, strain name for 2014 and 2015 isolates, and GenBank accession number. Scale bar
Figure 2. St. Louis encephalitis virus phylogeny with 2015 California (USA CA) and 2014 and 2015 Arizona (USA AZ) genomes (black circles). Complete nucleotide genomes (except for isolate 2282, which included only the...
Unlike California, where continual SLEV testing has been conducted since 1969, the absence of SLEV activity in mosquitoes in Arizona during 2010–2014 may have been due to a lack of recent SLEV testing. Maricopa County began testing mosquito pools for SLEV RNA during the 2015 human epidemic and then retrospectively detected SLEV in an archived WNV-positive mosquito pool from November 2014. We sequenced complete genomes of 1 SLEV isolate from California in 2015 and two isolates from Arizona in 2015, and partial genomes of the 2014 isolate from Arizona and 1 additional 2015 California isolate from reverse transcription PCR amplicons using SLEV primers (Table; GenBank accession nos. KX258460–62 [California], KX965720 [Arizona]). We further determined the phylogenetic relationships of the sequenced isolates with each other and with complete SLEV genomes from GenBank, including another 2015 Arizona isolate (strain 121B, GenBank accession no. KT823415) sequenced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Figure 2). The 2014 and 2015 California and Arizona SLEV isolates share >99% nucleotide identity with each other and also with their closest published relative, isolated from Cx. quinquefasciatus mosquitoes collected in Cordoba, Argentina, in 2005. The 2015 SLEV isolates are genetically distinct from the 2003 Imperial Valley California strain that was isolated before the 11-year absence of SLEV activity in the state. These results suggest that there was likely a single introduction of SLEV into the United States from South America (possibly Argentina) no later than November 2014, the earliest dated sample from which SLEV was isolated in Arizona, and that the virus spread in the summer of 2015 from Arizona to California. Notably, 1,710 mosquito pools representing 65,287 individual mosquitoes from the Coachella Valley were negative for SLEV during 2014.
Because human SLEV viremia levels are low and insufficient to infect mosquitoes, the virus may have been introduced into the United States from South or Central America by a viremic migratory bird or possibly by an infected mosquito exploiting human transportation (12). Earlier US SLEV strains from Tennessee and Texas isolated in 1974 and 2001, respectively, are most closely related to 1969 and 1978 Guatemalan strains (Figure 2). A similar ancestral topology of Brazil and Peru strains from the 1970s to the 2003 California isolate also suggests movement from South to North America. The Salton Sea and associated habitats possess diverse avifauna and may serve as a resting point for SLEV-infected migratory birds that traverse the Pacific flyway (13). Alternately, SLEV may have come from elsewhere in the United States after being introduced from South or Central America, but sequences from US states reporting SLEV activity in recent years are not publicly available. In the case of east-to-west movement across the United States, postnesting birds may have mediated spread by way of agricultural areas of northern Mexico. However, it is unknown whether SLEV is active in Mexico or the Imperial Valley, which lies between Phoenix and the Coachella Valley, because surveillance is not performed in those regions.
Our findings highlight how mosquitoborne viruses are emerging and reemerging to establish autochthonous transmission, including SLEV in southern California that produced severe and fatal human disease in 2015 in Arizona (6). Prospective surveillance can identify viruses circulating in mosquitoes even in the absence of human cases of infection, as in Coachella Valley in 2015, and may provide an early warning of future outbreaks.
A stipend to support K.S. was provided by a Veterinary Medicine Students Training in Advanced Research (STAR) fellowship at the University of California, Davis, School of Veterinary Medicine. The research was supported by start-up funds provided to L.L.C. by the Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, at the University of California, Davis, School of Veterinary Medicine.
Dr. White has worked at the Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District for the past 6 years, studying the transmission of arboviruses and mosquito control methods.

References

  1. Murray RHabel LMackey KWallace Peck BAMora SJ, et al. Epidemiologic aspects of the 1984 St. Louis encephalitis epidemic in southern California. Proceedings of the California Mosquito and Vector Control Association1985;53:59.
  2. Reisen WKMeyer RPMilby MMPresser SBEmmons RWHardy JLet al. Ecological observations on the 1989 outbreak of St. Louis encephalitis virus in the southern San Joaquin Valley of California. J Med Entomol1992;29:47282.DOIPubMed
  3. Howitt BFLouis encephalitis in relationship to human infections in California, 1937–1938Am J Public Health Nations Health1939;29:108397.DOIPubMed
  4. Reisen WKLothrop HDWheeler SSKennsington MGutierrez AFang Yet al. Persistent West Nile virus transmission and the apparent displacement St. Louis encephalitis virus in southeastern California, 2003-2006. J Med Entomol2008;45:494508.PubMed
  5. Fang YReisen WKAm J Trop Med Hyg2006;75:4805.PubMed
  6. Venkat HKrow-Lucal EHennessey MJones JAdams LFischer Met al. Concurrent outbreaks of St. Louis encephalitis virus and West Nile virus disease—Arizona, 2015MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep2015;64:134950.PubMed
  7. Brault ACFang YReisen WKMultiplex qRT-PCR for the detection of western equine encephalomyelitis, St. Louis encephalitis, and West Nile viral RNA in mosquito pools (Diptera: Culicidae)J Med Entomol2015;52:4919.DOIPubMed
  8. California Department of Public Health, UC Davis Arbovirus Research and Training, Mosquito and Vector Control Association of CaliforniaLatest West Nile virus activity in California [cited 2016 Oct 7]. http://www.westnile.ca.gov
  9. Zimmer CScientists investigate how viruses like Zika cause birth defectsNew York Times2016 Feb 9. p. D6.
  10. Taketa-Graham MPowell Pereira JLBaylis ECossen COceguera LPatiris Pet al. High throughput quantitative colorimetric microneutralization assay for the confirmation and differentiation of West Nile Virus and St. Louis encephalitis virus. Am J Trop Med Hyg2010;82:5014.DOIPubMed
  11. Patiris PJOceguera LFIIIPeck GWChiles REReisen WKHanson CVAm J Trop Med Hyg2008;78:43441.PubMed
  12. Monath TPSSt. Louis encephalitis virus. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association1980.
  13. Reisen WKWheeler SSGarcia SFang YMigratory birds and the dispersal of arboviruses in California. Am J Trop Med Hyg2010;83:80815.DOIPubMed
  14. Kumar SStecher GTamura KMEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol2016;33:18704.DOIPubMed

Figures

Table

Suggested citation for this article: White GS, Symmes K, Sun P, Fang Y, Garcia S, Steiner C, et al. Reemergence of St. Louis encephalitis virus, California, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Dec [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2212.160805
DOI: 10.3201/eid2212.160805

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario en la entrada