Volume 22, Number 8—August 2016
Rare Human Infection with Pacific Broad Tapeworm Adenocephalus pacificus, Australia
To the Editor: Human diphyllobothriosis associated with the Pacific broad tapeworm Adenocephalus pacificus(syn. Diphyllobothrium pacificum) is a reemerging, global parasitic disease (1). Infection with the adult tapeworm occurs widely in piscivorous mammals, including humans, with various species of marine fish acting as intermediate hosts (1,2). In the Southern Hemisphere, the organism is well described in the coastal waters of South America, southern Africa, and Oceania (2). A. pacificus tapeworms have been recorded in pinnipeds in Australian territory as far back as 1923 (3). To our knowledge, no human case has been reported from this region to date.
A 3-year-old boy from a coastal town in South Australia’s Eyre Peninsula was brought to a medical clinic on July 29, 2015, with a 1-month history of poor appetite and loose bowel movements. His parents had noticed tapeworm-like organisms in his feces over a period of 2 days; the organisms had been discarded and were not available for examination. The child regularly ate raw marine fish, caught by his father in the Spencer Gulf during recreational fishing. The types of fish he consumed included southern bluefin tuna (Thunnus maccoyii), spotted sillago (Sillaginodes punctatus), and southern goatfish (Upeneichthys vlamingii). The child had never traveled outside Australia. Fecal and blood samples were collected for further analysis at SA Pathology (Adelaide, South Australia, Australia).
Macroscopic examination of a single, 6-cm portion of unfixed strobila without scolex, obtained from feces, revealed individual proglottids, wider than they were long, and a central rosette-shaped uterus in each proglottid. Further morphologic features could not be clearly visualized from the available clinical specimen. Microscopic examination of fecal sediment revealed unembryonated ellipsoidal eggs with an operculum and abopercular knob at opposite ends (2). The patient had been given a preliminary clinical diagnosis of diphyllobothriosis and received oral praziquantel (10 mg/kg) on 2 occasions, 12 days apart, without any complications. Blood test results, including hemoglobin level, erythrocyte volume, and vitamin B12 levels, were all within reference ranges. A follow-up stool sample collected 1 week after the first dose of praziquantel still exhibited operculated eggs; samples collected 3 weeks later did not contain any eggs.
We identified the tapeworm more specifically through molecular methods. Genomic DNA from segments preserved in 80% ethanol were extracted using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Four loci were PCR-amplified separately from the genomic DNA as described (4–6). The first locus (designated cox1) targeted the complete cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene; the second locus (designated Dpcox1), located within the cox1 gene, was amplified by using species-specific (D. pacificum) primers (4); the third locus (designated SSU) targeted the small subunit gene of RNA; and the fourth locus (designated ITS) targeted the first to second internal transcribed spacer regions. For each locus, automated DNA sequencing (BigDye Terminator v3.1 Kit; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was performed by using the primers for PCR amplification (4–6) in separate reactions. We identified cox1 and Dpcox1 sequences by local alignment comparison (6 reading frames) using amino acid sequences conceptually translated online (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/st/emboss_transeq/) from respective genes of the reference sequences ofDiphyllobothrium spp. available from GenBank. DNA sequencing results identified the tapeworm as A. pacificus.
Sequence data from this study have been submitted to GenBank (accession nos. KU519704–6). Morphologic voucher material is archived in the Australian Helmintological Collection, South Australian Museum (accession nos. AHC47709 and AHC36233).
Data obtained from cox1 gene analysis (Figure, panel A) suggest that this isolate is indistinguishable from an A. pacificus tapeworm previously obtained from an Australian sea lion, Neophoca cinerea (GenBank accession no. KR269744), from Kangaroo Island and an Australian fur seal, Arctocephalus pusillus(GenBank accession no. KR269745), from Cape Woolamai in 1993 (2). Similarly, the human isolate we identified is indistinguishable from isolates previously obtained from fish and humans in Chile, Peru, and Spain (Figure, panel A). However, the human isolates from Spain (GenBank accession nos. HF969327 and KM520151) have been linked with fresh fish imported from South America (7,8). Small subunit and internal transcribed spacer sequence analysis showed that the human isolate was identical or closely related to isolates from Peru (Figure, panels B, C). This finding is in keeping with this species’ current predominant geographic distribution (2).
Two recent food risk assessments in Australia did not recognize A. pacificus tapeworms as a potential zoonotic threat in marine finfish (9,10). Although our patient only consumed raw locally caught marine fish, thus acquiring a patent infection after accidental ingestion of plerocercoids, the fish species concerned have yet to be confirmed as suitable intermediate hosts of A. pacificus tapeworms (1). These findings, and reports spanning >90 years, suggest that A. pacificus tapeworms are endemic in piscivorous mammals off the Australian coast, and more human cases can be expected as pressure on marine fish stocks and consumption of uncooked fish increase. As a protective measure against this emerging foodborne zoonotic threat, the public should be made aware of risks associated with consumption of fresh, raw marine fish.
We thank Amanda Rogers from SA Pathology for her contribution.
- Kuchta R, Serrano-Martínez ME, Scholz T. Pacific broad tapeworm Adenocephalus pacificus as a causative agent of globally reemerging diphyllobothriosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:1697–703.
- Hernández-Orts JS, Scholz T, Brabec J, Kuzmina T, Kuchta R. High morphological plasticity and global geographical distribution of the Pacific broad tapeworm Adenocephalus pacificus (syn. Diphyllobothrium pacificum): molecular and morphological survey. Acta Trop. 2015;149:168–78.
- Johnston TH. Entozoa from the Australian hair seal. Proc Linn Soc N S W. 1937. [cited 2016 Jan 20].http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/34903721#page/59/mode/1up
- Wicht B, Yanagida T, Scholz T, Ito A, Jiménez JA, Brabec J. Multiplex PCR for differential identification of broad tapeworms (Cestoda:Diphyllobothrium) infecting humans. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:3111–6.
- Mariaux J. A molecular phylogeny of the Eucestoda. J Parasitol. 1998;84:114–24.
- Luton K, Walker D, Blair D. Comparisons of ribosomal internal transcribed spacers from two congeneric species of flukes (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda: Digenea). Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992;56:323–7.
- Pastor-Valle J, González LM, Martín-Clemente JP, Merino FJ, Gottstein B, Gárate T. Molecular diagnosis of diphyllobothriasis in Spain, most presumably acquired via imported fish, or sojourn abroad. New Microbes New Infect. 2014;2:1–6.
- Kuchta R, Esteban JG, Brabec J, Scholz T. Misidentification of Diphyllobothrium species related to global fish trade, Europe. Emerg Infect Dis.2014;20:1955–7.
- Anantanawat S, Kiermeier A, McLeod C, Sumner J. South Australian Research and Development Institute. A semi-quantitative risk assessment of harmful parasites in Australian finfish. April 2012 [cited 2016 Jan 20]. http://safefish.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Semi-quantitative-risk-assessment-of-Harmful-Parasites.pdf
- New South Wales Food Authority. Seafood safety scheme—periodic review of the risk assessment. 2012. [cited 2016 Jan 20].http://foodauthority.nsw.gov.au/_Documents/scienceandtechnical/seafood_safety_scheme.pdf
Suggested citation for this article: Moore CV, Thompson RCA, Jabbar A, Williams J, Rasiah K, Pallant L, et al. Rare human infection with Pacific broad tapeworm Adenocephalus pacificus, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Aug [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2208.160156