miércoles, 17 de junio de 2015

Readability of Ebola Information on Websites of Public Health Agencies, United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Europe - Volume 21, Number 7—July 2015 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

full-text ►

Readability of Ebola Information on Websites of Public Health Agencies, United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Europe - Volume 21, Number 7—July 2015 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC





Volume 21, Number 7—July 2015

Dispatch

Readability of Ebola Information on Websites of Public Health Agencies, United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Europe

Tables

Technical Appendicies

Enrique Castro-SánchezComments to Author , Elpiniki Spanoudakis, and Alison H. Holmes
Author affiliations: Imperial College London, London, UK; and National Institute for Health Research, London

Abstract

Public involvement in efforts to control the current Ebola virus disease epidemic requires understandable information. We reviewed the readability of Ebola information from public health agencies in non–Ebola-affected areas. A substantial proportion of citizens would have difficulty understanding existing information, which would potentially hinder effective health-seeking behaviors.
The outbreak of Ebola virus disease (EVD) that originated in Guinea in April 2014 has become the largest known epidemic of this pathogen and was declared an international public health emergency (1). In addition, repatriation of health care workers and volunteers to Europe and the United States has resulted in human-to-human transmission in western health care organizations (2), thus bringing Ebola to the fore of public attention in settings far removed from local outbreak areas.
Currently, because there is no antiviral treatment or vaccine, surveillance and strict observation of recommended infection prevention and control measures, aided by public awareness regarding symptoms and prompt health care–seeking behavior, are essential efforts to control Ebola. In Africa, low awareness has led to community misunderstandings and unwillingness to cooperate with medical teams (3). In non–EVD-affected countries, nonrigorous information has resulted in unfounded fear among health care workers and citizens, disrupting the activity of hospitals caring for persons with EVD (4).
For health messages to be followed effectively, they must be tailored to the health literacy of the audience. Health literacy, which refers to “the cognitive and social skills which determine the motivation and ability of individuals to gain access to, understand and use information in ways which promote and maintain good health” (5), has been associated with better self-care (6). However, a substantial proportion of citizens worldwide have insufficient or inadequate health literacy (7).
Several factors, including readability of information provided (8), can help reduce health literacy deficits. Readability refers to “the determination of the reading comprehension level a person must have to understand written materials” (9). It is recommended that health information materials should be written at a level typically understandable by an 11-year-old person (10). Such recommendations for clarity and understandability might be more effective if one considers that anxiety or panic attributed to a highly virulent infection, such as Ebola, might hinder comprehension of related information (11).
We examined readability of EVD public information available from selected public health agencies in non–EVD-affected countries. Countries that have EVD should explore how well this information would serve to reduce panic and anxiety and perform as an effective source of advice for the public.
Dr. Castro-Sánchez is the lead research nurse at the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, London, UK. His research interests include health literacy in infectious diseases and healthcare-associated infections, and effect of social networks on clinicians and patients’ attitudes to infection.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infection and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London in partnership with PHE.
E.C.-S. was responsible for the design of the study and collected data. A.H.H. provided technical input during all stages of the project and analysis. All authors were responsible for data analysis, contributed substantially to writing the manuscript, approved its final version, had full access to all data in the study, and take responsibility for the integrity, accuracy, and presentation of data. E.C.-S. is the guarantor.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Statement on the 1st meeting of the IHR emergency committee on the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa. World Health Organization, IHR Emergency Committee regarding Ebola; 2014 [cited 2014 Nov 11].http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2014/ebola-20140808/en/
  2. World Health Organization. WHO Disease Outbreak News 1st October 2014: Ebola virus disease—United States of America. World Health Organization, Global alert and response; 2014 [cited 2014 Nov 11]. http://www.who.int/csr/don/01-october-2014-ebola/en/
  3. Ebola in West Africa: gaining community trust and confidence. Lancet2014;383:1946DOIPubMed
  4. Mosquera MMelendez VLatasa P. Handling Europe’s first Ebola case: internal hospital communication experience. Am J Infect Control. 2015;Feb 24:pii: S0196-6553(15)00033-4.
  5. Nutbeam DHealth literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int2000;15:25967DOI
  6. White SChen JAtchison RRelationship of preventive health practices and health literacy: a national study. Am J Health Behav2008;32:22742.DOIPubMed
  7. Rudd REHealth literacy skills of U.S. adults. Am J Health Behav2007;31(Suppl 1):S818DOIPubMed
  8. National Work Group on Literacy and HealthCommunicating with patients who have limited literacy skills. J Fam Pract1998;46:16876.PubMed
  9. Albright Jde Guzman CAcebo PPaiva DFaulkner MSwanson JReadability of patient education materials: implications for clinical practice. Appl Nurs Res1996;9:13943DOIPubMed
  10. Cotugna NVickery CECarpenter-Haefele KMEvaluation of literacy level of patient education pages in health-related journals. J Community Health2005;30:2139DOIPubMed
  11. Calvo MGCarreiras MSelective influence of test anxiety on reading processes. Br J Psychol1993;84:37588 and. DOIPubMed
  12. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentOECD skills outlook 2013: first results from the survey of adult skills. ParisOrgan.2013;•••: .DOI
  13. van Bekkum JEHilton SPrimary care nurses’ experiences of how the mass media influence frontline healthcare in the UK. BMC Fam Pract.2013;14:178DOIPubMed
  14. Fox S. Digital divisions. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project; 2005 [cited 2014 Nov 11].http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2005/PIP_Digital_Divisions_Oct_5_2005.pdf
  15. Meade CSmith C. Readability formulae: cautions and criteria. Patient Education and Counseling. 1991;17:153e8.

Table

Technical Appendix

Suggested citation for this article: Castro-Sánchez E, Spanoudakis E, Holmes AH. Readability of Ebola information on websites of public health agencies, United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Jul [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2107.141829
DOI: 10.3201/eid2107.141829

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario