martes, 2 de julio de 2019

Ahead of Print - Estimated Incubation Period and Serial Interval for Human-to-Human Influenza A(H7N9) Virus Transmission - Volume 25, Number 10—October 2019 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Ahead of Print - Estimated Incubation Period and Serial Interval for Human-to-Human Influenza A(H7N9) Virus Transmission - Volume 25, Number 10—October 2019 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC



CDC - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - CDC 24/7: Saving Lives. Protecting People.â„¢

Volume 25, Number 10—October 2019
Research Letter

Estimated Incubation Period and Serial Interval for Human-to-Human Influenza A(H7N9) Virus Transmission

Lei Zhou, Qun LiComments to Author , and Timothy M. Uyeki
Author affiliations: Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China (L. Zhou)Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing (L. Zhou, Q. Li)Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (T.M. Uyeki)

Abstract

We estimated the incubation period and serial interval for human-to-human–transmitted avian influenza A(H7N9) virus infection using case-patient clusters from epidemics in China during 2013–2017. The median incubation period was 4 days and serial interval 9 days. China’s 10-day monitoring period for close contacts of case-patients should detect most secondary infections.
As of April 2019, a total of 1,568 confirmed cases of avian influenza A(H7N9) virus infection acquired in China have been reported in humans since the virus emerged in spring 2013 (1,2). A large increase in infections occurred in China during the fifth H7N9 virus epidemic (2016–17), prompting concerns of increased H7N9 virus transmissibility in humans (3). However, as of June 2019, only evidence of limited, nonsustained human-to-human transmission has been reported (3).
Field investigations of case-patients with confirmed H7N9 virus infections are critical to assessing possible human-to-human transmission. The incubation period for H7N9 virus infection has been estimated to be 3–7 days (46). However, the incubation period estimated in these studies primarily reflects sporadic poultry-to-human transmission; no study has specifically focused on the incubation period for human-to-human H7N9 virus transmission. Although the kinds of exposures, amount of virus per exposure, and routes of exposure might differ between poultry-to-human and limited human-to-human H7N9 virus transmission, whether the incubation periods differ is unknown. Data on the incubation period for H7N9 virus in the setting of human-to-human transmission can help determine the appropriate duration for monitoring exposed close contacts, including healthcare personnel, of confirmed H7N9 case-patients.
We analyzed the data on all clusters of epidemiologically linked H7N9 case-patients collected during field investigations of 5 epidemics that occurred in mainland China during 2013–2017 and that were reported to the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC). We focused on clusters involving probable human-to-human transmission in which no poultry exposure, including visits to live poultry markets, was reported for epidemiologically linked secondary case-patients exposed to a symptomatic index case-patient, as previously described (3). We defined the incubation period for secondary case-patients as days from the date of an unprotected exposure within 1 meter to an index case-patient for any duration beginning, at the earliest, the day before illness onset of the index case-patient to the date of illness onset of the secondary case-patient. The exposures and dates of illness onset were determined through field investigations of each H7N9 case-patient. For secondary case-patients with multiple days of exposure to an ill index case-patient, we used the earliest exposure date to define the maximum incubation period and the last exposure date (such as the index case-patient’s date of hospital isolation) to define the minimum incubation period. We estimated incubation periods using median values, as done previously (1,7), and compared them by epidemic. We calculated serial intervals using the reported illness onset dates of index and secondary case-patients. We classified secondary case-patients as blood related or unrelated and compared median serial intervals by subgroup and epidemic.
Among 14 secondary H7N9 case-patients in 14 clusters of probable human-to-human transmission, the overall median estimated incubation period was 4 (range 1–12) days (Table). The median overall and medians of the minimum and maximum incubation periods estimated for secondary case-patients in the fifth epidemic were not significantly different than those estimated for case-patients in previous epidemics (Table). The estimated median serial interval among secondary case-patients who were blood related to an index case-patient (n = 6; 9.5 [range 5–12] days) and unrelated to an index case-patient (n = 8; 8 [range 6–15] days) were not significantly different (Appendix Table). The median serial interval for H7N9 virus infection among all clusters from the 5 epidemics was 9 (range 6–11) days and was not significantly different between epidemics (data not shown).
Overall, the incubation period and serial interval for limited human-to-human H7N9 virus transmission (including blood-related and unrelated persons) were unchanged during 2013–2017. Limitations to this study that could have affected our estimates include a small sample size of 14 secondary case-patients and the potential to misclassify secondary case-patients as a result of unrecognized or unreported poultry exposure. However, data on human, poultry, and environmental exposures and dates of illness onset included in our analyses were collected during detailed field investigations that were initiated promptly among close contacts of index case-patients after laboratory confirmation of H7N9 virus infection and reported to the China CDC.
Compared with other types of analyses, our use of median values to describe the epidemiologic parameters for H7N9 case-patients in the 14 clusters might have led to an overestimation of the incubation period and serial interval for human-to-human H7N9 virus transmission. For example, parametric analyses performed with data from much larger datasets (mostly H7N9 cases resulting from poultry exposures), in which data with right-skewed distributions were censored, were reported to provide shorter estimated incubation periods (46,8). The incubation period could also have been overestimated among case-patients with multiple exposure days to an index case-patient, if infection did not occur on the first day of exposure. Therefore, further comprehensive epidemiologic investigations to better define the transmission dynamics of human-to-human H7N9 virus transmission are critical. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that China’s policy since 2013 for a 10-day monitoring period for close contacts of H7N9 case-patients should detect most symptomatic secondary infections.
Dr. Zhou is Chief of the Branch for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Public Health Emergency Center, China CDC, Beijing, China. Her research interests are prevention and control of emerging infectious diseases and pandemic influenza preparedness and response.

Acknowledgment

We thank the local and provincial Chinese CDC staff for providing assistance with data collection, Yuelong Shu and colleagues for their contributions to laboratory testing, Ruiqi Ren for help with data collection and analyses, and Carolyn M. Greene for assistance with interpretation of study results.

References

  1. Li  QZhou  LZhou  MChen  ZLi  FWu  Het al. Epidemiology of human infections with avian influenza A(H7N9) virus in China. N Engl J Med2014;370:52032DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  2. World Health Organization. Influenza at the human-animal interface. Summary and assessment, 13 February to 9 April 2019. 2019[cited 2019 Jun 5]. https://www.who.int/influenza/human_animal_interface/Influenza_Summary_IRA_HA_interface_09_04_2019.pdf?ua=1External Link
  3. Zhou  LChen  EBao  CXiang  NWu  JWu  Set al. Clusters of human infection and human-to-human transmission of avian influenza A(H7N9) virus, 2013–2017. Emerg Infect Dis2018;24:397400DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  4. Cowling  BJJin  LLau  EHLiao  QWu  PJiang  Het al. Comparative epidemiology of human infections with avian influenza A H7N9 and H5N1 viruses in China: a population-based study of laboratory-confirmed cases. Lancet2013;382:12937DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  5. Virlogeux  VLi  MTsang  TKFeng  LFang  VJJiang  Het al. Estimating the distribution of the incubation periods of human avian influenza A(H7N9) virus infections. Am J Epidemiol2015;182:7239DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  6. Virlogeux  VYang  JFang  VJFeng  LTsang  TKJiang  Het al. Association between the severity of influenza A(H7N9) virus infections and length of the incubation period. PLoS One2016;11:e0148506DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  7. Huai  YXiang  NZhou  LFeng  LPeng  ZChapman  RSet al. Incubation period for human cases of avian influenza A (H5N1) infection, China. Emerg Infect Dis2008;14:181921DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  8. Lessler  JReich  NGBrookmeyer  RPerl  TMNelson  KECummings  DAIncubation periods of acute respiratory viral infections: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis2009;9:291300DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
Table
Suggested citation for this article: Zhou L, Li Q, Uyeki TM. Estimated incubation period and serial interval for human-to-human transmission of influenza A(H7N9) virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 Oct [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2510.190117
DOI: 10.3201/eid2510.190117


Original Publication Date: 7/2/2019

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario