domingo, 28 de enero de 2018

Improving attendance to genetic counselling services for gynaecological oncology patients. - PubMed - NCBI

Improving attendance to genetic counselling services for gynaecological oncology patients. - PubMed - NCBI



 2018 Jan 10;5:2. doi: 10.1186/s40661-018-0059-z. eCollection 2018.

Improving attendance to genetic counselling services for gynaecological oncology patients.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Gynaecological cancers may be the sentinel malignancy in women who carry a mutation in BRCA1 or 2, a mis-match repair gene causing Lynch Syndrome or other genes. Despite published guidelines for referral to a genetics service, a substantial number of women do not attend for the recommended genetic assessment. The study aims to determine the outcomes of systematic follow-up of patients diagnosed with ovarian or endometrial cancer from Gynaecologic-oncology multidisciplinary meetings who were deemed appropriate for genetics assessment.

METHODS:

Women newly diagnosed with gynaecological cancer at the Royal Hospital for Women between 2010 and 2014 (cohort1) and 2015-2016 (cohort 2) who were identified as suitable for genetics assessment were checked against the New South Wales/Australian Capital Territory genetic database. The doctors of non-attenders were contacted regarding suitability for re-referral, and patients who were still suitable for genetics assessment were contacted by mail. Attendance was again checked against the genetics database.

RESULTS:

Among 462 patients in cohort 1, flagged for genetic assessment, 167 had not consulted a genetic service at initial audit conducted in 2014. 86 (18.6%) women whose referral was pending clarification of family history and/or immunohistochemistry did not require further genetic assessment. Letters were sent to 40 women. 7 women (1.5%) attended hereditary cancer clinic in the following 6 months.The audit conducted in 2016 identified 148 patients (cohort 2) appropriate for genetic assessment at diagnosis. 66 (44.6%) had been seen by a genetics service, 51 (34.5%) whose referral was pending additional information did not require further genetic assessment. Letters were sent to 15 women, of whom 9 (6.1%) attended genetics within 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS:

To improve the effectiveness of guidelines for the genetic referral of women newly diagnosed with ovarian cancer, clinicians need to obtain a thorough family history at diagnosis; arrange for reflex MMR IHC according to guidelines; offer BRCA or panel testing to all women with non-mucinous ovarian cancer prior to discharge and systematically follow up all women referred to genetics at the post-op visit.

KEYWORDS:

BRCA1; BRCA2; Effectiveness; Efficacy; Genetic testing; Hereditary cancer clinic; Mainstreaming

PMID:
 
29344385
 
PMCID:
 
PMC5763520
 
DOI:
 
10.1186/s40661-018-0059-z

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario