lunes, 26 de marzo de 2012

Mutation analysis of RAD51D in non-BRCA1/2 ovari... [Br J Cancer. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

Mutation analysis of RAD51D in non-BRCA1/2 ovari... [Br J Cancer. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

Br J Cancer. 2012 Mar 13. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.87. [Epub ahead of print]

Mutation analysis of RAD51D in non-BRCA1/2 ovarian and breast cancer families.


1] Program in Cancer Genetics, Departments of Oncology and Human Genetics, Gerald Bronfman Centre for Clinical Research in Oncology, McGill University, 546 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, Quebec H2W 1S6, Canada [2] Department of Medical Genetics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.


Background:Recent data show that mutations in RAD51D have an aetiological role in ovarian carcinoma, yet mutations do not appear to be associated with an increased risk for breast cancer. We studied ovarian and breast cancer families having at least one woman affected by ovarian carcinoma, to assess the importance of RAD51D mutations in such families.Methods:The coding region of the RAD51D gene was analysed in 175 BRCA1/2-negative families with family histories of both ovarian and breast cancer ascertained from two Canadian and two Belgian institutions.Results:We identified one previously reported deleterious mutation, p.Arg186(*) (c.556C>T), and two novel variants; missense substitution p.Cys119Arg and an intronic variant c.83-26A>G. p.Arg186(*) segregated with the disease in the family and two ovarian carcinomas available for analysis showed loss of the wild-type allele, but the novel variants are likely neutral.Conclusion:RAD51D should be included in genetic screening of ovarian cancer families that do not have BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations. We show that mutations are more likely to be found in families with two or more ovarian cancers, or in probands with first-degree relatives with ovarian cancer, and we feel testing should be preferentially offered to affected women from such families.British Journal of Cancer advance online publication, 13 March 2012; doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.87
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario