domingo, 18 de marzo de 2012

The cost-effectiveness of screening lung cancer ... [Br J Cancer. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI

The cost-effectiveness of screening lung cancer ... [Br J Cancer. 2012] - PubMed - NCBI
Br J Cancer. 2012 Mar 13;106(6):1100-6. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.60. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

The cost-effectiveness of screening lung cancer patients for targeted drug sensitivity markers.

Source

Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.

Abstract

Background:New oncology drugs are being developed in conjunction with companion diagnostics with approval restricting their use to certain biomarker-positive subgroups. We examined the impact of different predictive biomarker screening techniques and population enrichment criteria on the cost-effectiveness of targeted drugs in lung cancer, using ALK and crizotinib to build the initial model.Methods:Health economic modeling of cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year was based on literature review and expert opinion. The modeled population represented advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), eligible for predictive biomarker screening with prescribing restricted to biomarker-positive patients.Results:For assays costing $1400 per person, cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for ALK screening all advanced NSCLC, excluding treatment cost, is $106 707. This falls to $4756 when only a highly enriched population is screened (increasing biomarker frequency from 1.6 to 35.9%). However, the same enrichment involves missing 56% patients who segregate within the unscreened group. Cheaper screening tests that miss some true positives can be more cost-effective if proportional reductions in cost exceed proportion of subjects missed. Generic modeling of idealised screening assays, including treatment cost, reveals a dominant effect of screening cost per person at low biomarker frequencies. Cost-effectiveness of <$100 000 per QALY gained is not achievable at biomarker frequencies <5% (with drug costs $1-5000 per month and screening costs $600-1400 per person).Interpretation:Cost-effectiveness of oncology drugs whose prescribing is restricted to biomarker-positive subgroups should address the cost of detecting marker-positive patients. The cost of screening dominates at low frequencies and strategies to improve cost-effectiveness based on the assay cost, drug cost and the group screened should be considered in these scenarios.

PMID:
22374459
[PubMed - in process]
PMCID:
PMC3304427
[Available on 2013/3/13]

1 comentario: