Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a preoperative risk assessment index for older patients with colorectal cancer | BMC Cancer | Full Text

Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a preoperative risk assessment index for older patients with colorectal cancer | BMC Cancer | Full Text

BMC Cancer

Controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a preoperative risk assessment index for older patients with colorectal cancer

• Yuka Ahiko, 
• Dai Shida, 
• Tomoko Horie, 
• Taro Tanabe, 
• Yasuyuki Takamizawa, 
• Ryohei Sakamoto, 
• Konosuke Moritani, 
• Shunsuke Tsukamoto & 
• Yukihide Kanemitsu 

BMC Cancer volume 19, Article number: 946 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Assessment of preoperative general condition to predict postoperative outcomes is important, particularly in older patients who typically suffer from various comorbidities and exhibit impaired functional status. In addition to various indices such as Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), National Institute on Aging and National Cancer Institute Comorbidity Index (NIA/NCI), Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27), and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification (ASA-PS), controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is recently gaining attention as a tool to evaluate the general condition of patients from a nutritional perspective. However, the utility of these indices in older patients with colorectal cancer has not been compared.

Methods

The study population comprised 830 patients with Stage I - IV colorectal cancer aged 75 years or older who underwent surgery at the National Cancer Center Hospital from January 2000 to December 2014. Associations of each index with overall survival (OS) (long-term outcome) and postoperative complications (short-term outcome) were examined.

Results

For the three indices with the highest Akaike information criterion values (i.e., CONUT score, CCI and ACE-27), but not the remaining indices (NIA/NCI and ASA-PS), OS significantly worsened as general condition scores decreased, after adjusting for known prognostic factors. In contrast, for postoperative complications, only CONUT score was identified as a predictive factor (≥4 versus 0–3; odds ratio: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.13–3.13; P = 0.016).

Conclusion

For older patients with colorectal cancer, only CONUT score was a predictive factor of both long-term and short-term outcomes after surgery, suggesting that CONUT score is a useful preoperative risk assessment index.