Evidence Reviews & Guidelines in Genomic Medicine
New: CDC-NIH workshop paper: Evidence synthesis & guideline development in genomic medicine: current status & future prospects.
Guidelines we can trust, report from the Institute of Medicine
CDC blog post: Guidelines we can trust are crucial for the successful implementation of genomic medicine
CDC paper: Prioritizing genomic applications for action by level of evidence: a horizon-scanning method.
Dotson WD, et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Apr;95(4):394-402.
Dotson WD, et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Apr;95(4):394-402.
The CDC EGAPP initiative- Lessons learned over a decade
Evidence synthesis and guideline development in genomic medicine: current status and future prospects
- Sheri D. Schully PhD,
- Tram Kim Lam PhD, MPH,
- W. David Dotson PhD,
- Christine Q. ChangMPH,
- Naomi Aronson PhD,
- Marian L. Birkeland PhD,
- Stephanie Jo Brewster MS,
- Stefania Boccia PhD,
- Adam H. Buchanan MS,
- Ned Calonge MD, MPH,
- Kathleen Calzone MSN, RN,
- Benjamin Djulbegovic MD, PhD,
- Katrina A.B. Goddard PhD,
- Roger D. Klein MD,
- Teri E. Klein PhD,
- Joseph Lau MD,
- Rochelle Long PhD,
- Gary H. Lyman MD, MPH,
- Rebecca L. Morgan MPH,
- Christina G.S. Palmer CGC, PhD,
- Mary V. Relling PharmD,
- Wendy S. Rubinstein MD, PhD,
- Jesse J. Swen PharmD, PhD,
- Sharon F. Terry MA,
- Marc S. WilliamsMD, FAAP, FACMG
- et al.
- Genetics in Medicine
- (2014)
- doi:10.1038/gim.2014.69
- Received
- Accepted
- Published online
Abstract
Purpose:
With the accelerated implementation of genomic medicine, health-care providers will depend heavily on professional guidelines and recommendations. Because genomics affects many diseases across the life span, no single professional group covers the entirety of this rapidly developing field.
Methods:
To pursue a discussion of the minimal elements needed to develop evidence-based guidelines in genomics, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Cancer Institute jointly held a workshop to engage representatives from 35 organizations with interest in genomics (13 of which make recommendations). The workshop explored methods used in evidence synthesis and guideline development and initiated a dialogue to compare these methods and to assess whether they are consistent with the Institute of Medicine report “Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust.”
Results:
The participating organizations that develop guidelines or recommendations all had policies to manage guideline development and group membership, and processes to address conflicts of interests. However, there was wide variation in the reliance on external reviews, regular updating of recommendations, and use of systematic reviews to assess the strength of scientific evidence.
Conclusion:
Ongoing efforts are required to establish criteria for guideline development in genomic medicine as proposed by the Institute of Medicine.
Genet Med advance online publication 19 June 2014
Keywords:
evidence synthesis; genomic medicine; guideline development
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario