Propensity Score Analysis of the Prognostic Value of Genomic Assays for Breast Cancer in Diverse Populations Using the National Cancer Data Base
Affiliations
- PMID: 32521056
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32956
Abstract
Background: Genomic assays such as Oncotype Dx (ODX) and MammaPrint are used for risk-adapted treatment decisions among patients with early breast cancer. However, to the authors' knowledge, concordance between genomic assays is modest. Using real-world data, the authors performed a comparative analysis of ODX and MammaPrint.
Methods: A cohort of women diagnosed with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer who received ODX or MammaPrint was established using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) for 2010 through 2016. Using the propensity score matching method, 2 groups of patients with similar clinical and demographic characteristics were defined: one group received ODX and the other received MammaPrint. The authors examined the association between use of the ODX or MammaPrint assays and overall survival using Cox models.
Results: Of the 451,693 eligible patients, approximately 45.3% received ODX and 1.8% received MammaPrint testing. The use of ODX increased from 36.1% in 2010 to 49.9% in 2016, whereas use of MammaPrint increased from 0.5% in 2010 to 3.3% in 2016. The authors matched 5042 patients who received ODX with 5042 patients who received MammaPrint. The 5-year risks of death for the MammaPrint low-risk group and the ODX low-risk group were 3.4% and 4.7%, respectively. The prognostic value of MammaPrint was similar to that of ODX; the C-index was 0.614 (95% confidence interval, 0.572-0.657) for MammaPrint and 0.581 (95% confidence interval, 0.530-0.631) for ODX. There was a difference in the performance of the ODX assay observed across racial and/or ethnic groups (P < .001), with a slightly better performance noted among white compared with African American and Hispanic individuals.
Conclusions: Both the ODX and MammaPrint tests are good at identifying low-risk individuals who could be spared chemotherapy. The suboptimal performance of ODX in ethnic minority individuals deserves further investigation.
Keywords: biomarker; breast cancer; endocrine receptor; genomic assay; racial disparity.
© 2020 American Cancer Society.
Similar articles
- Racial disparities in omission of oncotype DX but no racial disparities in chemotherapy receipt following completed oncotype DX test results.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Feb;168(1):207-220. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4587-8. Epub 2017 Nov 27.PMID: 29181717
- Tumour profiling tests to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decisions in early breast cancer: a systematic review and economic analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jun;23(30):1-328. doi: 10.3310/hta23300.PMID: 31264581 Free PMC article.
- The Utility of Oncotype DX for Adjuvant Chemotherapy Treatment Decisions in Estrogen Receptor-positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-negative, Node-negative Breast Cancer.Cureus. 2020 Mar 14;12(3):e7269. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7269.PMID: 32195072 Free PMC article.
- Impact of gene expression profiling tests on breast cancer outcomes.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Dec;(160):1-105.PMID: 18457476 Free PMC article. Review.
- Prospective Validation of a Genomic Assay in Breast Cancer: The 70-gene MammaPrint Assay and the MINDACT Trial.Acta Med Acad. 2019 Apr;48(1):18-34. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.239.PMID: 31264430 Review.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario