lunes, 1 de junio de 2020

Impact of Family History Risk Assessment on Surgical Decisions and Imaging Surveillance at Breast Cancer Diagnosis - PubMed

Impact of Family History Risk Assessment on Surgical Decisions and Imaging Surveillance at Breast Cancer Diagnosis - PubMed



Impact of Family History Risk Assessment on Surgical Decisions and Imaging Surveillance at Breast Cancer Diagnosis

Affiliations 

Abstract

Introduction: In June 2013, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published guidance on the management of women with a family history (FH) of breast cancer (BC) and a personal diagnosis of BC. When diagnosed with BC, pressure of timely treatment takes priority and there is potential for a significant FH to be overlooked. This can affect treatment options and follow-up imaging (FUI) surveillance.
Methods: The practice in our breast unit was compared with the NICE guidance with regard to arranging appropriate FUI and referral to the genetics team for women diagnosed with BC with a FH of BC. Data were obtained retrospectively on 200 women with BC, identified from the breast multidisciplinary team meetings from January to March 2014. Initial audit showed poor compliance with recording of FH. A standardised history taking proforma was produced for clinic use. A reaudit was conducted on a further 200 women between May and July 2016.
Results: In the initial audit, FH was taken in 151 women (76%) compared with 174 women (87%) in the reaudit. Thirty-seven women (25%) were thought to be of moderate risk (MR) or high risk (HR) based on FH in the first audit. Reaudit identified 35 women (20%) with MR or HR FH. Under half (43%) of the women of HR were referred to the genetics team initially; this increased to 70% in the second audit. While almost half (46%) of the women with MR or HR had inappropriate FUI in the initial audit, this fell to 11% in the reaudit.
Conclusions: A proportion of women diagnosed with BC would fall into the MR or HR categories as defined in the NICE FH guidance. Inadequate recording of FH could result in inadequate FUI surveillance and in some cases missing the opportunity for a genetic referral to assess suitability for gene testing.
Keywords: Breast cancer; Family history; Genetics; Imaging surveillance; Risk assessment.

Similar articles

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario