Replication is more than we think it isScience should move towards a more inclusive definition of replication, which is not a housekeeping activity but an “exciting, generative, vital contributor to research progress,” write Brain Nosek and Timothy Errington of the Center for Open Science. Any study that provides evidence about a previous claim should be considered replication, the authors propose. PLOS Biology | 13 min read |
Cancer Nanotechnology
Hace 8 horas
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario