Curr Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(5):307-318. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4769. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
Cost-utility analysis of 21-gene assay for node-positive early breast cancer.
Masucci L1, Torres S2, Eisen A2,3, Trudeau M2,3, Tyono I2, Saunders H1, Chan KW2,3,4, Isaranuwatchai W1,4,5.
Author information
- 1
- Centre for Excellence in Economic Analysis Research, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
- 2
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
- 3
- Cancer Care Ontario, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
- 4
- Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
- 5
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
For women with lymph node (ln)-positive, estrogen receptor-positive, and her2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)-negative breast cancer (bca), current guidelines recommend treatment with both hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. The 21-gene Recurrence Score (rs) assay might be helpful in selecting patients with bca who can be spared chemotherapy when they have 1-3 positive lns and a lower risk of recurrence. In the present study, we performed a cost-utility analysis comparing use of the 21-gene rs assay with current practice from the perspective of a Canadian health care payer.
METHODS:
A Markov model was developed to determine costs and quality-adjusted life-years (qalys) over a patient's lifetime. Patient outcomes in both study groups were examined based on published clinical trials. Costs were derived primarily from published Canadian sources. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 1.5% annually, and costs are reported in 2016 Canadian dollars. A probabilistic analysis was used, and the model parameters were varied in a sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS:
The results indicate that use of the 21-gene rs assay was less costly ($432 less) and more effective (0.22 qalys) than current practice. The probabilistic analysis revealed that 70% of the 10,000 simulated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were in the southeast quadrant. The results were sensitive to the probability of a low rs and to the probability of receiving chemotherapy in the low-risk rs category and in current practice.
CONCLUSIONS:
Use of the 21-gene rs assay could be a cost-effective strategy for Ontario patients with estrogen receptor-positive, her2-negative early bca and 1-3 positive lns.
2019 Multimed Inc.
KEYWORDS:
21-gene assay; Cost-effectiveness; breast cancer; chemotherapy
- PMID:
- 31708649
- PMCID:
- PMC6821112
- DOI:
- 10.3747/co.26.4769
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario