domingo, 17 de noviembre de 2019

Cost-utility analysis of 21-gene assay for node-positive early breast cancer. - PubMed - NCBI

Cost-utility analysis of 21-gene assay for node-positive early breast cancer. - PubMed - NCBI



 2019 Oct;26(5):307-318. doi: 10.3747/co.26.4769. Epub 2019 Oct 1.

Cost-utility analysis of 21-gene assay for node-positive early breast cancer.

Author information


1
Centre for Excellence in Economic Analysis Research, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
2
Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
3
Cancer Care Ontario, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
4
Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
5
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

For women with lymph node (ln)-positive, estrogen receptor-positive, and her2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)-negative breast cancer (bca), current guidelines recommend treatment with both hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. The 21-gene Recurrence Score (rs) assay might be helpful in selecting patients with bca who can be spared chemotherapy when they have 1-3 positive lns and a lower risk of recurrence. In the present study, we performed a cost-utility analysis comparing use of the 21-gene rs assay with current practice from the perspective of a Canadian health care payer.

METHODS:

A Markov model was developed to determine costs and quality-adjusted life-years (qalys) over a patient's lifetime. Patient outcomes in both study groups were examined based on published clinical trials. Costs were derived primarily from published Canadian sources. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 1.5% annually, and costs are reported in 2016 Canadian dollars. A probabilistic analysis was used, and the model parameters were varied in a sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS:

The results indicate that use of the 21-gene rs assay was less costly ($432 less) and more effective (0.22 qalys) than current practice. The probabilistic analysis revealed that 70% of the 10,000 simulated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were in the southeast quadrant. The results were sensitive to the probability of a low rs and to the probability of receiving chemotherapy in the low-risk rs category and in current practice.

CONCLUSIONS:

Use of the 21-gene rs assay could be a cost-effective strategy for Ontario patients with estrogen receptor-positive, her2-negative early bca and 1-3 positive lns.

KEYWORDS:

21-gene assay; Cost-effectiveness; breast cancer; chemotherapy

PMID:
 
31708649
 
PMCID:
 
PMC6821112
 
DOI:
 
10.3747/co.26.4769

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario