ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing
- Genetics in Medicine
- Published online
In clinical exome and genome sequencing, there is a potential for the recognition and reporting of incidental or secondary findings unrelated to the indication for ordering the sequencing but of medical value for patient care. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recently published a policy statement on clinical sequencing that emphasized the importance of alerting the patient to the possibility of such results in pretest patient discussions, clinical testing, and reporting of results. The ACMG appointed a Working Group on Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing to make recommendations about responsible management of incidental findings when patients undergo exome or genome sequencing. This Working Group conducted a year-long consensus process, including an open forum at the 2012 Annual Meeting and review by outside experts, and produced recommendations that have been approved by the ACMG Board. Specific and detailed recommendations, and the background and rationale for these recommendations, are described herein. The ACMG recommends that laboratories performing clinical sequencing seek and report mutations of the specified classes or types in the genes listed here. This evaluation and reporting should be performed for all clinical germline (constitutional) exome and genome sequencing, including the “normal” of tumor-normal subtractive analyses in all subjects, irrespective of age but excluding fetal samples. We recognize that there are insufficient data on penetrance and clinical utility to fully support these recommendations, and we encourage the creation of an ongoing process for updating these recommendations at least annually as further data are collected.
Genet Med advance online publication 20 June 2013
Genet Med advance online publication 20 June 2013
Keywords:genome; genomic medicine; incidental findings; personalized medicine; secondary findings; sequencing; whole exome; whole genome
- A timely arrival for genomic medicine. Genet Med 2011;13:195–196. , , , et al.
- Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here. Genet Med 2013;15:258–267. , , , et al.
- Opportunities and challenges for the integration of massively parallel genomic sequencing into clinical practice: lessons from the ClinSeq project. Genet Med 2012;14:393–398. .
- Clinical genome sequencing. In: , (eds). Genomic and Personalized Medicine. In press. Elsevier: San Diego. , , .
- Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived datasets. Genet Med 2012;14:361–384. , , , et al.
- Population studies: return of research results and incidental findings Policy Statement. Eur J Hum Genet 2012;21:245–247. , , , .
- Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network. Genet Med 2012;14:424–431. , , , et al.
- Informed consent and genomic incidental findings: IRB chair perspectives. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2011;6:53–67. , , , , , .
- Genomic research and incidental findings. J Law Med Ethics 2008;36(2):292–297, 212. .
- Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing. Genet Med 2012;14:405–410. , , , et al.
- Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genet Med 2011;13:499–504. , , .
- Taxonomizing, sizing, and overcoming the incidentalome. Genet Med 2012;14:399–404. , , .
- An informatics approach to analyzing the incidentalome. Genet Med 2013;15:36–44. , , , et al.
- Genetics professionals’ perspectives on reporting incidental findings from clinical genome-wide sequencing. Am J Med Genet A 2013;161:542–549. , , , , .
- Points to consider in the clinical application of genomic sequencing. Genet Med 2012;14:759–761. .
- The outcomes for patients with incidental lesions: serendipitous or iatrogenic? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:1193–1196. , , .
- Genomic incidental findings: reducing the burden to be fair. Am J Bioeth 2013;13:52–54. , , , .
- The future of incidental findings: should they be viewed as benefits? J Law Med Ethics 2008;36:341–351, 213. .
- You never call, you never write: why return of ‘omic’ results to research participants is both a good idea and a moral imperative. Per Med 2011;8:651–657. .
- ACMG recommendations for standards for interpretation and reporting of sequence variations: Revisions 2007. Genet Med 2008;10:294–300. , , , et al.
- Offering individual genetic research results: context matters. Sci Transl Med 2010;2(38):20–38. , .
- Incomplete knowledge of the clinical context as a barrier to interpreting incidental genetic research findings. Am J Bioeth 2013;13:58–60. , .
- Points to consider: ethical, legal, and psychosocial implications of genetic testings in children and adolescents. Am J Hum Genet 1995;57:1233–1241. .
- Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children. Pediatrics 2013;131:620–622. .
- Technical report: ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children. Genet Med 2013;15:234–245. , , , .
- From genetics to genomics: ethics, policy, and parental decision-making. J Pediatr Psychol 2009;34:639–647. , .
- Screening in Chronic Disease. Oxford University Press: New York, 1985. .
- Population screening in the age of genomic medicine. N Engl J Med 2003;348:50–58. , , .
- The evidence dilemma in genomic medicine. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:1600–1611. , , , , , .
- Public health genomics: the end of the beginning. Genet Med 2011;13:206–209. .
- The coming explosion in genetic testing–is there a duty to recontact? N Engl J Med 2011;365:1367–1369. .
- Estimating the annual number of false negative cystic fibrosis newborn screening tests. Pediatr Pulmonol 2012;47:207–208. , .
- Secondary variants in individuals undergoing exome sequencing: screening of 572 individuals identifies high-penetrance mutations in cancer-susceptibility genes. Am J Hum Genet 2012;91:97–108. , , , et al.
- Rapid whole-genome sequencing for genetic disease diagnosis in neonatal intensive care units. Sci Transl Med 2012;4(154):135–154. , , , et al.
- “I’m fine; I’m just waiting for my disease”: the new and growing class of presymptomatic patients. Neurology 2011;77:522–523. , .
- Next Steps in the Sequence: The Implications of Whole Genome Sequencing for Health in the UK 2011. 978-1-907198-08-3. , , , et al.