miércoles, 20 de marzo de 2019

Differences in Neuropathogenesis of Encephalitic California Serogroup Viruses - Volume 25, Number 4—April 2019 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Differences in Neuropathogenesis of Encephalitic California Serogroup Viruses - Volume 25, Number 4—April 2019 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC





Volume 25, Number 4—April 2019

Research

Differences in Neuropathogenesis of Encephalitic California Serogroup Viruses

Alyssa B. Evans, Clayton W. Winkler, and Karin E. PetersonComments to Author 
Author affiliations: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, USA

Abstract

The California serogroup of orthobunyaviruses comprises a group of mosquitoborne viruses, including La Crosse (LACV), snowshoe hare (SSHV), Tahyna (TAHV), Jamestown Canyon (JCV), and Inkoo (INKV) viruses, that cause neurologic disease in humans of differing ages with varying incidences. To determine how the pathogenesis of these viruses differs, we compared their ability to induce disease in mice and replicate and induce cell death in vitro. In mice, LACV, TAHV, and SSHV induced neurologic disease after intraperitoneal and intranasal inoculation, and JCV induced disease only after intranasal inoculation. INKV rarely induced disease, which correlated with less viral antigen in the brain than the other viruses. In vitro, all viruses replicated to high titers; however, LACV, SSHV, and TAHV induced high cell death, whereas JCV and INKV did not. Results demonstrated that CSG viruses differ in neuropathogenesis in vitro and in vivo, which correlates with the differences in pathogenesis reported in humans.
The California serogroup (CSG) of orthobunyaviruses comprises a large group of closely related mosquitoborne, trisegmented, negative-sense RNA viruses in the family Peribunyaviridae of the order Bunyavirales. La Crosse virus (LACV), snowshoe hare virus (SSHV), Tahyna virus (TAHV), Jamestown Canyon virus (JCV), and Inkoo virus (INKV) are members of the CSG that have been reported to cause neurologic disease in humans. LACV, SSHV, TAHV, and INKV primarily cause neuroinvasive disease in children; however, the incidence differs for each virus (13). LACV is the leading cause of pediatric viral encephalitis in the United States, responsible for ≈50–100 reported cases per year. SSHV and TAHV only cause several reported cases of neuroinvasive disease annually (1,2,46), and TAHV disease most often manifests as influenza-like symptoms and only rarely leads to encephalitis (2,7). INKV has caused the fewest cases of human disease. However, several confirmed neuroinvasive cases have occurred in Finland, and children had more severe disease than adults (3). In contrast, JCV appears to preferentially cause neuroinvasive disease in adults, and several cases occur every year in the United States and Canada (1,8). Because the number of reported cases increased substantially in the 2010s, JCV is considered a potentially emerging arboviral disease (9).
The number of actual cases caused by these CSG viruses is likely underreported because of the difficulty of diagnosing these viral infections. Patients who do not seek medical treatment and those with less severe disease might not be included in case reports. All 5 viruses have high reported seroprevalence rates in endemic regions: ≈1%–27% for LACV, JCV, and SSHV; ≈24%–51% for INKV; and up to 80% for TAHV (1,2,1012).
Thumbnail of Global distribution, phylogenetic relationship, and vectors and hosts of the 5 California serogroup (CSG) viruses included in study of neuropathogenesis of encephalitic CSG viruses. A) These viruses are found across the globe, primarily throughout North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa (1,4,8,10,12–29). Several of these viruses have overlapping regions of distribution (as indicated by diagonal patterns), including in the United States, where LACV, SSHV, and JCV are all present, and
Figure 1. Global distribution, phylogenetic relationship, and vectors and hosts of the 5 California serogroup (CSG) viruses included in study of neuropathogenesis. A) These viruses are found across the globe, primarily throughout North...
These CSG viruses have differing but overlapping geographic distributions (Figure 1, panel A). LACV, JCV, and SSHV are all found in the United States; JCV and SSHV extend into Canada, and SSHV extends into Russia (1,2,4,8,10,1328). Although TAHV and INKV are primarily found in Europe, TAHV extends into Africa and Asia, and INKV is limited to northern Europe and Russia (2,3,12,29,3436). These CSG viruses use a variety of mosquito vectors, primarily in the Aedes and Ochlerotatus genera, and mammalian host species, including small rodents (SSHV, LACV, and TAHV), hares (SSHV, TAHV, and INKV), and deer (JCV) (Figure 1, panel B) (1,2,12,22,29,3133).
Despite their differing and widespread geographical distributions, the CSG viruses are genetically closely related. The large segment encodes the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, the medium segment encodes 2 envelope glycoproteins and a nonstructural protein, and the small segment encodes the nucleocapsid and a second nonstructural protein (NSs), which in LACV is a type I interferon antagonist (37,38). Across all 3 segments, JCV and INKV are the most closely related to each other, with 84%–92.4% nucleotide identity, followed by LACV and SSHV with 79.4%–89.1% nucleotide identity (30). TAHV has ≈72.5%–84.7% nucleotide identity with LACV and SSHV and 69.2%–80.3% with JCV and INKV (30).
In mouse studies of LACV, weanling C57BL/6 mice were susceptible to neurologic disease after intraperitoneal inoculation, but adult mice were not, demonstrating age-dependent susceptibility to disease that mimics clinical disease in humans (39). Certain strains of TAHV, but not JCV, have been shown to cause neurologic disease in weanling Swiss Webster mice after intraperitoneal inoculation, although both viruses were capable of replicating in the brain after intracranial inoculation (40,41). In these studies, only weanling mice were used, and thus, age-dependent susceptibility was not evaluated.
Determining how LACV, SSHV, TAHV, JCV, and INKV differ in pathogenesis in animal and cell culture models could help explain their differing disease outcomes in humans. However, a direct comparison between these viruses in their ability to invade the central nervous system (CNS) and induce neuronal damage has not been investigated. In this study, we investigated age-related differences in pathogenesis of LACV, SSHV, TAHV, JCV, and INKV. We examined the ability of these viruses to enter the CNS and cause disease in mice and their ability to replicate in neurons and induce cell death in vitro.

Materials and Methods

Cells and Viruses
All cell culture reagents were from Gibco (http://www.biosciences.ie/gibco) unless otherwise specified. We maintained Vero cells in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Atlas Biologicals, https://atlasbio.com) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin solution; C6/36 cells in minimum essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 1× nonessential amino acids, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin; the neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y (American Type Culture Collection [ATCC], https://www.atcc.org) in a 1:1 ratio of Eagle minimum essential medium (ATCC) and F-12K (ATCC) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin; and H9 human embryonic stem cell–derived human neural stem cells (hNSCs; Gibco, https://www.fishersci.com) in KnockOut DMEM/F-12 supplemented with 1× GlutaMAX-I Supplement, 20 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor, 20 ng/mL epidermal growth factor, 2% StemPro neural supplement, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. We seeded hNSCs on plates or flasks treated with 20 μg/mL fibronectin in Dulbecco phosphate-buffered saline for 1 h at 37°C. We passaged stocks of LACV (human 1978 strain), JCV (strain 61V2235), TAHV (strain 92 Bardos), SSHV (1976), and INKV (SW AR 83-161), all kindly provided by Stephen Whitehead (Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), in Vero or C6/36 cells up to 3 times.
Inoculation of Mice
All mouse experiments were approved by the Rocky Mountain Laboratories Animal Care and Use Committee (Hamilton, Montana, USA) and performed in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines under protocol 2016-061-E. We used C57BL/6 mice for all experiments.
We inoculated weanlings at 21–23 days of age, adults at 6–8 weeks of age, and aged mice at 19–34 weeks of age. We diluted the viruses in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). For intraperitoneal inoculations, we injected mice with 105 or 103 PFU of virus in a volume of 200 μL. For intranasal inoculations, we inoculated mice with 104 or 102 PFU of virus in a volume of 20 μL. We anesthetized mice with isoflurane before inoculation. After inoculation, we checked mice twice daily for clinical signs of neurologic disease, which primarily included ataxia, circling, limb paralysis and weakness, twitching, and seizures. Mice displaying signs of neurologic disease were perfused transcardially with 100 U/mL heparin saline before removal of tissues. We humanely euthanized mice that did not display any signs of neurologic disease by 30 days postinoculation (dpi).
RNA Isolation and Quantitative Reverse Transcription PCR
For RNA analysis, we flash-froze spleens and brain tissue from infected mice in liquid nitrogen, then stored them at −80°C. We performed mRNA analysis as previously described (42). We amplified viral RNA from mouse tissues using the following virus-specific primers: LACV forward (5′-ATTCTACCCGCTGACCATTG-3′) and reverse (5′-GTGAGAGTGCCATAGCGTTG-3′), SSHV forward (5′-AGCATGATCAAAACGGAGGC-3′) and reverse (5′-CATGCCAATCAGACACCAGC-3′), TAHV forward (5′-AGGTCCTACATTGCCGTTCA-3′) and reverse (5′-TGGTCTACAGGTGCTAGCTC-3′), JCV forward (5′-′TATGGTTCCCCGGTAGTGTG-3′) and reverse (5′-TAACATGGTGCTTCTCGTGC-3′), and INKV forward (5′-AGTCCAAGATAAAGCCCCAGA-3′) and reverse (5′-TCATGTTAGCCTGGCATCCA-3′). We subjected primer sequences to BLAST analysis (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and tested each primer set on RNA from brains of mice infected with the 5 CSG viruses that had neurologic disease to verify virus-specific amplification by each primer set.
Immunohistochemistry
For immunohistochemistry studies, we transcardially perfused mice, removed tissues, and placed them in 10% neutral buffered formalin. After fixation, we cryoprotected tissues in 30% sucrose in PBS, embedded them in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. Compound (Sakura, https://www.sakura.eu) and froze them on dry ice; then, 10-μm sections were cut on a cryostat and mounted on slides. We washed sections with PBS and blocked for 30 minutes in blocking buffer (PBS with 5% normal donkey serum, 0.1% triton-X, and 0.3 M glycine). We diluted the primary antibody against viral antigens (in-house polyclonal antibody raised in rabbits in response to LACV infection, 1:100) and microtubule-associated protein 2 (mouse monoclonal antibody MAB3418, 1:200; Millipore, http://www.emdmillipore.com) in blocking buffer, applied these solutions to tissues, and incubated them overnight at 4°C. We washed tissue sections with PBS and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature with donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 647 (1:1,000, Life Technologies, https://www.thermofisher.com) and donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 594 (1:500, Life Technologies). After washing sections again with PBS, we stained with Hoechst (1:1,000) and mounted on slides with ProLong Gold (Invitrogen, https://www.thermofisher.com). We imaged entire brain sections using the Zeiss Axio Scan.Z1 (https://www.zeiss.com) with the 40× objective lens. We acquired high-resolution images on the Zeiss 710 laser scanning microscope with the 63× objective and processed images in Imaris version 8.4.1 (https://imaris.oxinst.com) or Fiji (http://fiji.sc).
Cytotoxicity Assays
We coated 96-well plates with fibronectin as previously described and seeded 5 × 104 SH-SY5Y cells or 2 × 104 hNSCs per well. The next day, cells were inoculated with each virus in triplicate at multiplicities of infection (MOIs) of 0.1 and 0.01 for SH-SY5Y cells and 0.01 and 0.001 for hNSCs. We added Cytotox Green (Essen Bioscience, https://www.essenbioscience.com) for a final well volume of 100 μL and a final concentration of 250 nM. Cells were then imaged with an IncuCyte (Essen Bioscience) by taking 3 images per well with the 20× objective every 3 hours during a 97-hour time course. We measured confluence and fluorescent intensity using IncuCyte S3 software. We performed all statistical analyses using Prism 7.0c (https://www.graphpad.com).
Replication Kinetics
We plated and inoculated cells as described in the previous section, except that plates seeded with SH-SY5Y cells were not treated with fibronectin. We collected supernatants at 1, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours postinoculation. We determined virus titers of supernatants by plaque assay using Vero cells as described previously (43). We counted LACV, TAHV, and JCV plaques at 5 dpi and SSHV and INKV plaques at 3 dpi. We performed all statistical analyses using Prism 7.0c (https://www.graphpad.com).
 Top

Results

Assessment of Neuroinvasive Disease in Mice after Intraperitoneal Inoculation with CSG Viruses
Thumbnail of Neuroinvasiveness of California serogroup (CSG) viruses in weanling C57BL/6 mice after intraperitoneal inoculation in study of neuropathogenesis. We inoculated 5–15 mice per group with 105 PFU of each virus (A) and 6–13 mice per group with 103 PFU of LACV, SSHV, or TAHV (B). Brains and spleens of mice were collected at the experimental endpoint and evaluated for viral RNA by quantitative reverse transcription PCR with virus-specific primers. The average of 3 mock controls is reporte
Figure 2. Neuroinvasiveness of California serogroup (CSG) viruses in weanling C57BL/6 mice after intraperitoneal inoculation in study of neuropathogenesis. We inoculated 5–15 mice per group with 105 PFU of each virus (A) and...
To determine if these 5 CSG viruses differed in their ability to enter the CNS and cause neurologic disease (i.e., neuroinvasive disease), C57BL/6 mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with a high dose (105 PFU) of each virus. Because previous studies of LACV infection showed clear age-dependent differences in disease susceptibility between weanling and adult mice, we inoculated weanling, adult, and aged mice with each virus and followed them for the development of clinical signs of neurologic disease. None of the viruses induced neuroinvasive disease in adult or aged mice after intraperitoneal inoculation (data not shown). However, neuroinvasive disease developed by 5–6 dpi in all weanling mice inoculated with 105 PFU of LACV (Figure 2, panel A), consistent with previous reports (39,44). SSHV induced neuroinvasive disease in ≈70% of weanling mice and TAHV in ≈80% of weanling mice. Neurologic signs were primarily observed at 6–7 dpi for SSHV and 5–6 dpi for TAHV. Neurologic signs were similar for LACV, SSHV, and TAHV and included ataxia, circling, limb paralysis and weakness, twitching, and seizures. JCV and INKV did not induce neuroinvasive disease in any weanling mice.
In previous studies with LACV, nearly 100% of weanling mice were susceptible to neuroinvasive disease after intraperitoneal inoculation at a dose of 103PFU (39). To determine if TAHV and SSHV also maintain their pathogenicity at this low dose, we inoculated weanling mice intraperitoneally with 103 PFU of LACV, SSHV, or TAHV. JCV and INKV were not included in this experiment because they did not induce neuroinvasive disease at the high dose. Consistent with previous studies, 103 PFU of LACV caused disease in 100% of mice but with a slight delay in the onset of neurologic signs compared with the 105 PFU dose (Figure 2, panel B). At the low dose, SSHV induced disease in a similar percentage of mice as the high dose, whereas TAHV caused disease in only 1 of 9 mice at the low dose (Figure 2, panel B).
All weanling mice with neurologic disease had detectable viral RNA in the brain, whereas weanling, adult, and aged mice without neurologic disease had no detectable virus in the brain compared with mock controls (Figure 2, panels C, D; data not shown). Regardless of disease outcome, mice had little to no detectable viral RNA in the spleen (Figure 2, panels E, F; data not shown), suggesting clearance of virus from the periphery.
Overall, these results indicate that LACV, SSHV, and TAHV can induce neuroinvasive disease in weanling mice after intraperitoneal inoculation, whereas JCV and INKV cannot. None of the CSG viruses caused neurologic signs in adult or aged mice after intraperitoneal inoculation, suggesting an age-related susceptibility of mice to LACV-, SSHV-, and TAHV-induced neuroinvasive disease.
Assessment of Neurovirulence of CSG Viruses after Intranasal Inoculation of Mice
Thumbnail of Neurovirulence of California serogroup (CSG) viruses in adult, aged, and weanling mice after intranasal inoculation in study of neuropathogenesis of encephalitic CSG viruses. Groups of adult (A, B) and aged (C, D) mice (6–8 mice per group) were inoculated with 104 PFU of each virus; groups of adult (E, F) and aged (G, H) mice (6–8 mice per group) were inoculated with 102 PFU of LACV, SSHV, TAHV, and JCV; and 5 weanling mice were inoculated with 104 PFU of INKV (I, J). E, G) Survival
Figure 3. Neurovirulence of California serogroup (CSG) viruses in adult, aged, and weanling mice after intranasal inoculation in study of neuropathogenesis of encephalitic CSG viruses. Groups of adult (A, B) and aged (C,...
The inability of a virus to cause neuroinvasive disease after intraperitoneal inoculation could be due to a lack of virus replication in the periphery or an inability of the virus to gain access to the CNS. These barriers can be bypassed by intracranial or intranasal inoculation. For example, LACV is not neuroinvasive in adult mice after intraperitoneal inoculation but does cause disease in adult mice when inoculated intracranially or intranasally (39,44,45). Because none of these CSG viruses caused disease in older mice after intraperitoneal inoculation, adult and aged mice were inoculated intranasally with each virus to determine if they were neurovirulent (i.e., could replicate in the brain) and neuropathogenic (i.e., could cause disease in the brain) after a more direct inoculation route and to determine if neuropathogenesis was restricted by age. Because of the low stock concentration of some viruses, we could not inoculate mice with 105 PFU intranasally; therefore, we used a high dose of 104 PFU and a low dose of 102 PFU. At a dose of 104 PFU per mouse, all viruses except INKV induced neurologic disease in nearly all adult and aged mice (Figure 3, panels A, C). INKV was less neuropathogenic than the other CSG viruses, inducing disease in only 1 of 6 adult mice and 2 of 7 aged mice. Compared with the high dose, the low dose induced neurologic disease in a reduced percentage of mice for all viruses, except LACV in aged mice (Figure 3, panels E, G). Viral RNA was readily detectable in the brains (Figure 3, panels B, D, F, H) but not spleens (data not shown) of all mice with neurologic disease.
Because INKV induced limited disease in adult mice, we inoculated weanling mice intranasally with INKV to determine if neuropathogenicity was age dependent. Neurologic disease developed in 3 (60%) of 5 mice and was associated with viral RNA in the brain (Figure 3, panels I, J). Thus, with a high dose and direct intranasal route to the CNS, INKV was more neuropathogenic in young mice than in adults (Figure 3, panels B, J).
Thumbnail of Viral antigen in brains of adult and aged mice exhibiting neurologic disease after intranasal inoculation of 104 PFU of California serogroup (CSG) viruses in study of neuropathogenesis of encephalitic CSG viruses. We evaluated >4 brains from mice infected with each CSG virus, except INKV (where only 3 brains from mice with neurologic disease were available), for viral immunoreactivity. A, B) Representative images showing distribution of virus (white) and virus merged with Hoechst
Figure 4. Viral antigen in brains of adult and aged mice exhibiting neurologic disease after intranasal inoculation of 104 PFU of California serogroup (CSG) viruses in study of neuropathogenesis. We evaluated >4...
Next, we examined the distribution of the CSG viruses in the brain using immunohistochemistry. In mice inoculated intranasally with 104 PFU of LACV, SSHV, TAHV, or JCV that had neurologic disease, virus was widespread throughout the brains regardless of the day after inoculation or severity of neurologic disease (Figure 4, panels A, B). In contrast, the brains of adults and aged mice displaying neurologic disease after intranasal inoculation of INKV showed only small, sporadic patches of virus (Figure 4, panels A, B). All viruses co-localized with the neuronal marker microtubule-associated protein 2, indicating that all CSG viruses primarily infected neurons within the CNS (Figure 4, panel C). Overall, these results demonstrate that LACV, SSHV, TAHV, and JCV are neurovirulent in mice when inoculated intranasally, whereas INKV appears to be less neurovirulent and infects fewer neurons within the CNS.
Ability of CSG Viruses to Replicate in and Kill Neurons in vitro
Thumbnail of Cytotoxicity and viral replication kinetics assays of California serogroup (CSG) viruses in SH-SY5Y cells and human neural stem cells (hNSCs) for up to 96 hours postinoculation in study of neuropathogenesis. SH-SY5Y cells were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1 (A, E, I) or 0.01 (B, F, J), and hNSCs were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 0.01 (C, G, K) or 0.001 (D, H, L). A–D) Confluence was measured over time on the IncuCyte (Essen Bioscience, https://www.essen
Figure 5. Cytotoxicity and viral replication kinetics assays of California serogroup (CSG) viruses in SH-SY5Y cells and human neural stem cells (hNSCs) for up to 96 hours postinoculation in study of neuropathogenesis. SH-SY5Y...
The differences in pathogenicity among the CSG viruses observed in mice and humans could be related to differences in their ability to infect and kill neurons. Therefore, we analyzed the ability of these viruses to replicate in and kill neurons using the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y and hNSCs. We inoculated cells with each virus at MOIs predetermined to provide a sufficient time frame to measure virus replication before the onset of substantial cell death with LACV (MOIs of 0.1 and 0.01 for SH-SY5Y cells and MOIs of 0.01 and 0.001 for hNSCs). In SH-SY5Y cells, LACV, SSHV, and TAHV induced substantial cell death at both MOIs, whereas JCV and INKV induced little cell death (Figure 5, panels A, B, E, F). However, JCV and INKV replicated to similar titers as LACV (Table 1), albeit with a delay in replication (Table 1Figure 5, panels I, J). In hNSCs, all 5 viruses induced cell death at both MOIs (Figure 5, panels C, D, G, H); however, LACV had a more pronounced cell death rate than the other viruses, indicating that LACV may be more neurotoxic to hNSCs than the other 4 CSG viruses, most notably INKV (Table 2Figure 5, panels G, H). All viruses rapidly replicated to high titers at both MOIs in hNSCs; however, JCV appeared to replicate slower and reached a lower peak titer than the other CSG viruses (Table 2Figure 5, panels K, L). All CSG viruses had significantly slower rates of growth in hNSCs with 1 or both MOIs compared with LACV (Table 2).
Together, these results suggest that LACV, SSHV, and TAHV are capable of replicating quickly to high titers in neurons and inducing substantial cell death. In contrast, INKV and JCV replicated more slowly but to similar titers. INKV and JCV also induced less cell death than the other CSG viruses, although the level of cell death varied by cell type. The lower cell death associated with INKV infection in vitro correlates with the low level of INKV infection within the CNS in vivo.
 Top

Discussion

In our study, the CSG viruses differed in pathogenesis both in mice and in vitro. Overall, LACV showed the highest neuropathogenicity and neurovirulence in vitro and in vivo, whereas INKV was the least pathogenic. These results appear to be consistent with disease patterns observed in humans, with LACV reported to cause the most neuroinvasive cases, and INKV only infrequent cases (3,4,14). Only LACV, TAHV, and SSHV were capable of causing neuroinvasive disease, a finding only observed in weanling mice. The lack of disease in adult animals is consistent with previous findings with LACV, where an age-dependent immune response in adult mice protects them from virus-induced neurologic disease (39,46).
LACV and SSHV maintained similar levels of neuroinvasiveness down to a dose of 103 PFU, whereas TAHV’s ability to induce neuroinvasive disease was greatly diminished at this low dose (Figure 2, panels A, B). The difference in dose-dependent disease susceptibility suggests that TAHV might be less virulent than LACV or SSHV. The lower virulence of TAHV than LACV or SSHV correlates with the low number of TAHV-induced neuroinvasive cases in humans, despite TAHV’s larger geographic distribution and higher rates of seroprevalence than LACV (1,2,4).
When the peripheral immune system was bypassed and adult and aged mice were inoculated intranasally, all viruses except INKV replicated extensively throughout the brain and caused neurologic disease (Figure 4). However, INKV did cause disease in a few adult and aged mice and 60% of weanling mice after intranasal inoculation, indicating INKV can be neuropathogenic under certain conditions, particularly in younger animals. These results are consistent with human case reports showing that INKV causes more severe disease in children than adults (3).
Less viral antigen was found in the brains of the 3 adult and aged INKV-inoculated mice that developed neurologic disease than in the brains from mice infected with the other CSG viruses (Figure 4). INKV induced less cell death than LACV in SH-SY5Y cells, suggesting that the lack of neuropathogenicity observed with INKV in vivo could be due to low levels of INKV-induced neuronal cell death. In addition, INKV also replicated slower than LACV in SH-SY5Y cells, suggesting the limited spread of INKV in the brains of mice might be due to inefficient replication of INKV in neurons. Further studies are needed to determine why INKV has a reduced ability to induce neuronal death compared with other CSG viruses.
In humans, JCV appears to be distinct from the other CSG viruses in that JCV preferentially causes neuroinvasive disease in adults rather than in children. Although we did not observe a similar age-dependent difference in neuroinvasion of JCV in mice, this virus did differ from the other CSG viruses. JCV (like INKV) was unable to invade the CNS, yet JCV (like LACV, SSHV, and TAHV) was highly neurovirulent in brains of mice when inoculated intranasally. However, the same high level of neurovirulence was not observed in vitro. In both SH-SY5Y cells and hNSCs, JCV induced less cell death and replicated slower than LACV. These findings suggest there might be underlying genetic differences or complexities in JCV pathogenesis not shared by any of the other CSGs.
Given that genetic variation exists within and between these encephalitic CSG viruses (30), additional differences in pathogenicity might exist for different isolates not tested in our studies. However, overall these results show that, despite being closely related, these CSG viruses differ substantially in their abilities to induce neurologic disease in mice and replicate in neurons in vitro and in vivo. Further characterization of the host and viral factors that contribute to the differences in CSG virus pathogenesis will help determine why INKV is less neurovirulent than the other CSG viruses and elucidate potential targets for CSG virus encephalitis therapies.
 Top
Dr. Evans is a postdoctoral fellow in the Laboratory of Persistent Viral Diseases at Rocky Mountain Laboratories in Hamilton, Montana, USA. Her primary research interests are in comparative viral genetics and viral-host interactions.
 Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Stephen Whitehead for providing the CSG viruses, Paul Policastro for assistance with SH-SY5Y cells and hNSC cultures, and Tyson Woods for LACV stock preparation and technical assistance. We thank Austin Athman and Ryan Kissinger for the preparation of Figure 1. We thank Leonard Evans, Stefano Boi, Emmie de Wit, and Carrie Long for critical review of the manuscript. We thank the staff of the Rocky Mountain Veterinary Branch, in particular Malea Higgins and Maarit Culbert, for excellent care of the animals used in this study.
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Division of Intramural Research, National Institutes of Health.
 Top

References

  1. Drebot  MAEmerging mosquito-borne bunyaviruses in Canada. Can Commun Dis Rep2015;41:11723DOIPubMed
  2. Hubálek  ZMosquito-borne viruses in Europe. Parasitol Res2008;103(Suppl 1):S2943DOIPubMed
  3. Putkuri  NKantele  ALevanov  LKivistö  IBrummer-Korvenkontio  MVaheri  Aet al. Acute human Inkoo and Chatanga virus infections, Finland. Emerg Infect Dis2016;22:8107DOIPubMed
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. La Crosse encephalitis. Epidemiology and geographic distribution. 2018 Jan 25 [cited 2018 May 22]. https://www.cdc.gov/lac/tech/epi.html
  5. Gaensbauer  JTLindsey  NPMessacar  KStaples  JEFischer  MNeuroinvasive arboviral disease in the United States: 2003 to 2012. Pediatrics2014;134:e64250DOIPubMed
  6. Lau  LWudel  BKadkhoda  KKeynan  YSnowshoe hare virus causing meningoencephalitis in a young adult from northern Manitoba, Canada. Open Forum Infect Dis2017;4:ofx150DOIPubMed
  7. Kilian  PRůzek  DDanielová  VHypsa  VGrubhoffer  LNucleotide variability of Tahyna virus (BunyaviridaeOrthobunyavirus) small (S) and medium (M) genomic segments in field strains differing in biological properties. Virus Res2010;149:11923DOIPubMed
  8. Pastula  DMHoang Johnson  DKWhite  JLDupuis  AP IIFischer  MStaples  JEJamestown Canyon virus disease in the United States—2000–2013. Am J Trop Med Hyg2015;93:3849DOIPubMed
  9. Pastula  DMSmith  DEBeckham  JDTyler  KLFour emerging arboviral diseases in North America: Jamestown Canyon, Powassan, chikungunya, and Zika virus diseases. J Neurovirol2016;22:25760DOIPubMed
  10. Kosoy  ORabe  IGeissler  AAdjemian  JPanella  ALaven  Jet al. Serological survey for antibodies to mosquito-borne bunyaviruses among US National Park Service and US Forest Service employees. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis2016;16:1918DOIPubMed
  11. Monath  TPNuckolls  JGBerall Bauer  HChappell  WAColeman  PHStudies on California encephalitis in Minnesota. Am J Epidemiol1970;92:4050DOIPubMed
  12. Putkuri  NVaheri  AVapalahti  OPrevalence and protein specificity of human antibodies to Inkoo virus infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol2007;14:155562DOIPubMed
  13. Walters  LLTirrell  SJShope  RESeroepidemiology of California and Bunyamwera serogroup (Bunyaviridae) virus infections in native populations of Alaska. Am J Trop Med Hyg1999;60:80621DOIPubMed
  14. Haddow  ADOdoi  AThe incidence risk, clustering, and clinical presentation of La Crosse virus infections in the eastern United States, 2003-2007. PLoS One2009;4:e6145DOIPubMed
  15. Clark  GGCrabbs  CLWatts  DMBailey  CLAn ecological study of Jamestown Canyon virus on the Delmarva Peninsula, with emphasis on its possible vector. J Med Entomol1986;23:58899DOIPubMed
  16. Boromisa  RDGrimstad  PRVirus-vector-host relationships of Aedes stimulans and Jamestown Canyon virus in a northern Indiana enzootic focus. Am J Trop Med Hyg1986;35:128595DOIPubMed
  17. Pinger  RRRowley  WAWong  YWDorsey  DCTrivittatus virus infections in wild mammals and sentinel rabbits in central Iowa. Am J Trop Med Hyg1975;24:10069DOIPubMed
  18. Heard  PBZhang  MBGrimstad  PRIsolation of Jamestown Canyon virus (California serogroup) from Aedes mosquitoes in an enzootic focus in Michigan. J Am Mosq Control Assoc1990;6:4618.PubMed
  19. Anderson  JFMain  AJArmstrong  PMAndreadis  TGFerrandino  FJArboviruses in North Dakota, 2003-2006. Am J Trop Med Hyg2015;92:37793DOIPubMed
  20. McFarlane  BLEmbil  JAArtsob  HSpence  LRozee  KRAntibodies to the California group of arboviruses in the moose (Alces alces americana Clinton) population of Nova Scotia. Can J Microbiol1981;27:121923DOIPubMed
  21. Berry  RLWeigert  BJLCalisher  CHParsons  MABear  GTEvidence for transovarial transmission of Jamestown Canyon virus in Ohio. Mosq News1977;37:4946.
  22. Issel  CJHoff  GLTrainer  DOSerologic evidence of infection of white-tailed deer in Texas with three California group arboviruses, (Jamestown Canyon, San Angelo, and Keystone). J Wildl Dis1973;9:2458DOIPubMed
  23. Tyers  DZimmer  JLewandowski  KHennager  SYoung  JPappert  Ret al. Serologic survey of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) in the Greater Yellowstone Area for brucellosis, tularemia, and snowshoe hare virus. J Wildl Dis2015;51:76973DOIPubMed
  24. Campbell  GLEldridge  BFHardy  JLReeves  WCJessup  DAPresser  SBPrevalence of neutralizing antibodies against California and Bunyamwera serogroup viruses in deer from mountainous areas of California. Am J Trop Med Hyg1989;40:42837DOIPubMed
  25. Eldridge  BFCalisher  CHFryer  JLBright  LHobbs  DJSerological evidence of California serogroup virus activity in Oregon. J Wildl Dis1987;23:199204DOIPubMed
  26. Issel  CJTrainer  DOThompson  WHSerologic evidence of infections of white-tailed deer in Wisconsin with three California group arboviruses (La Crosse, trivittatus, and Jamestown Canyon). Am J Trop Med Hyg1972;21:9858DOIPubMed
  27. Srihongse  SGrayson  MADeibel  RCalifornia serogroup viruses in New York State: the role of subtypes in human infections. Am J Trop Med Hyg1984;33:121827DOIPubMed
  28. Walker  EDGrayson  MAEdman  JDIsolation of Jamestown Canyon and snowshoe hare viruses (California serogroup) from Aedes mosquitoes in western Massachusetts. J Am Mosq Control Assoc1993;9:1314.PubMed
  29. Jentes  ESRobinson  JJohnson  BWConde  ISakouvougui  YIverson  Jet al. Acute arboviral infections in Guinea, West Africa, 2006. Am J Trop Med Hyg2010;83:38894DOIPubMed
  30. Hughes  HRLanciotti  RSBlair  CDLambert  AJFull genomic characterization of California serogroup viruses, genus Orthobunyavirus, family Peribunyaviridae including phylogenetic relationships. Virology2017;512:20110DOIPubMed
  31. Pantuwatana  SThompson  WHWatts  DMHanson  RPExperimental infection of chipmunks and squirrels with La Crosse and Trivittatus viruses and biological transmission of La Crosse virus by Aedes triseriatus. Am J Trop Med Hyg1972;21:47681DOIPubMed
  32. Artsob  HDistribution of California serogroup viruses and virus infections in Canada. Prog Clin Biol Res1983;123:27790.PubMed
  33. Andreadis  TGAnderson  JFArmstrong  PMMain  AJIsolations of Jamestown Canyon virus (BunyaviridaeOrthobunyavirus) from field-collected mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Connecticut, USA: a ten-year analysis, 1997-2006. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis2008;8:17588DOIPubMed
  34. Kunz  CBuckley  SMCasals  JAntibodies in man against Tahyna and Lumbo viruses determined by hemagglutination-inhibition and tissue-culture neutralization tests. Am J Trop Med Hyg1964;13:73841DOIPubMed
  35. Sonnleitner  STLundström  JBaumgartner  RSimeoni  JSchennach  HZelger  Ret al. Investigations on California serogroup orthobunyaviruses in the Tyrols: first description of Tahyna virus in the Alps. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis2014;14:2727DOIPubMed
  36. Kuniholm  MHWolfe  NDHuang  CYHMpoudi-Ngole  ETamoufe  ULeBreton  Met al. Seroprevalence and distribution of FlaviviridaeTogaviridae, and Bunyaviridae arboviral infections in rural Cameroonian adults. Am J Trop Med Hyg2006;74:107883DOIPubMed
  37. Elliott  RMOrthobunyaviruses: recent genetic and structural insights. Nat Rev Microbiol2014;12:67385DOIPubMed
  38. Blakqori  GDelhaye  SHabjan  MBlair  CDSánchez-Vargas  IOlson  KEet al. La Crosse bunyavirus nonstructural protein NSs serves to suppress the type I interferon system of mammalian hosts. J Virol2007;81:49919DOIPubMed
  39. Taylor  KGWoods  TAWinkler  CWCarmody  ABPeterson  KEAge-dependent myeloid dendritic cell responses mediate resistance to la crosse virus-induced neurological disease. J Virol2014;88:110709DOIPubMed
  40. Bennett  RSGresko  AKMurphy  BRWhitehead  SSTahyna virus genetics, infectivity, and immunogenicity in mice and monkeys. Virol J2011;8:135DOIPubMed
  41. Bennett  RSNelson  JTGresko  AKMurphy  BRWhitehead  SSThe full genome sequence of three strains of Jamestown Canyon virus and their pathogenesis in mice or monkeys. Virol J2011;8:136DOIPubMed
  42. Butchi  NBWoods  TDu  MMorgan  TWPeterson  KETLR7 and TLR9 trigger distinct neuroinflammatory responses in the CNS. Am J Pathol2011;179:78394DOIPubMed
  43. Winkler  CWMyers  LMWoods  TAMesser  RJCarmody  ABMcNally  KLet al. Adaptive immune responses to Zika virus are important for controlling virus infection and preventing infection in brain and testes. J Immunol2017;198:352635DOIPubMed
  44. Bennett  RSCress  CMWard  JMFirestone  CYMurphy  BRWhitehead  SSLa Crosse virus infectivity, pathogenesis, and immunogenicity in mice and monkeys. Virol J2008;5:25DOIPubMed
  45. Winkler  CWRace  BPhillips  KPeterson  KECapillaries in the olfactory bulb but not the cortex are highly susceptible to virus-induced vascular leak and promote viral neuroinvasion. Acta Neuropathol2015;130:23345DOIPubMed
  46. Winkler  CWMyers  LMWoods  TACarmody  ABTaylor  KGPeterson  KELymphocytes have a role in protection, but not in pathogenesis, during La Crosse Virus infection in mice. J Neuroinflammation2017;14:62DOIPubMed
 Top

Figures

Tables

 Top
Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2504.181016
Original Publication Date: 3/4/2019

No hay comentarios:

Publicar un comentario