Increased Community-Associated Infections Caused by Panton-Valentine Leukocidin–Negative MRSA, Shanghai, 2005–2014 - Volume 22, Number 11—November 2016 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

Increased Community-Associated Infections Caused by Panton-Valentine Leukocidin–Negative MRSA, Shanghai, 2005–2014 - Volume 22, Number 11—November 2016 - Emerging Infectious Disease journal - CDC

Volume 22, Number 11—November 2016

Dispatch

Increased Community-Associated Infections Caused by Panton-Valentine Leukocidin–Negative MRSA, Shanghai, 2005–2014

On This Page

• The Study
• Conclusions
• Suggested Citation

Figures

• Figure

Tables

• Table

Downloads

• PDF[1.22 MB - 4 pgs]
• RIS[TXT - 2 KB]

Min Li1, Yanan Wang2, Yuanjun Zhu2, Yingxin Dai2, Xufen Hong, Qian Liu, Tianming Li, Juanxiu Qin, Xiaowei Ma, Huiying Lu, Jie Xu, and Michael Otto1 

Author affiliations: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China (M. Li, Y. Wang, Y. Zhu, Y. Dai, X. Hong, Q. Liu, T. Li, J. Qin, X. Ma, H. Lu, J. Xu); National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland, USA (M. Otto)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

During 2005–2014, community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections increased in Shanghai, China. Most infections were caused by sequence type 59 S. aureus that lacked Panton-Valentine leukocidin. This finding challenges the notion that Panton-Valentine leukocidin is necessary for epidemiologic success of community-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

In the United States, community-associated (CA) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in otherwise healthy persons in the community, first reported in the late 1990s (1), have reached epidemic dimensions (2). Despite considerable research efforts, the molecular underpinnings of the epidemiologic success of CA-MRSA are still not completely understood. Most typically connected with CA-MRSA is Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL). However, the role of PVL in CA-MRSA infection is controversial, primarily because of contradictory results from studies of animal infection models (3). A common belief is that if a clone from a patient with CA–S. aureus infection is positive for PVL, the S. aureus is probably a more dangerous clone and the patient would require specific care (4).

In the United States, virtually all CA-MRSA infections are caused by a PVL-positive clone of pulsed-field type USA300 (5). CA-MRSA infections with USA300 have also occasionally occurred outside the United States and adjacent regions. However, according to a recent study, they are derived from multiple importation events, suggesting that further spread in those locations is unlikely (6). Rather, global CA-MRSA infections are caused by geographically divergent clones that are unrelated to USA300. Like USA300, most of them contain PVL genes (2), although PVL is extremely rare in hospital-associated MRSA clones. This epidemiologic correlation is the predominant basis of the notion that PVL is causally associated with the enhanced virulence potential of CA-MRSA clones (7). Of note, despite generally enhanced virulence in animal models at levels similar to that of USA300 (8), the number of infections caused by global CA-MRSA clones remains limited (9,10). This situation raises the question of whether non-USA300 global CA-MRSA lineages have the potential to further intensify infection frequency and severity, and if so, whether PVL would be a necessary factor in such a scenario.

The CA-MRSA lineage that predominates in China and many other parts of Asia, thus threatening the largest global population, is sequence type (ST) 59 (10). Recent studies performed in Taiwan and northern Vietnam found a correlation between a PVL-positive subset of ST59 (Taiwan clone) and infection, but PVL-negative ST59 (Asia–Pacific clone) was found to be a largely noninfectious colonizer (11,12). Therefore, a causal relationship between PVL and infection has also been proposed for that CA-MRSA lineage.

The Study

We studied S. aureus isolates collected over 10 years (2005–2014) at Shanghai Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China, a large teaching hospital at which ≈10,000 patients from the entire Shanghai metropolitan area are admitted each day. We obtained 2,048 infectious S. aureus isolates and characterized them by multilocus sequence and spa typing, antibiotic resistance profiling, determination of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC) mec type (encoding methicillin resistance), and analytical PCR to determine presence of the lukSF genes encoding PVL. For isolates obtained during 2005–2010, we investigated randomly selected subsets (100 isolates/year); for isolates obtained during 2011, 2012, and 2014, we investigated all isolates. No isolates were collected in 2013. CA–S. aureus was defined as an isolate obtained from either an outpatient or an inpatient (including from general and urgent care and emergency rooms) <24 h after hospital admission, who lacked risk factors (contact with the hospital environment in the 6 months preceding the culture, S. aureus infection history, residence in a long-term care facility in the 12 months before culture, presence of a central vascular catheter at the time of infection, or recent use of antimicrobial drugs). These data were obtained by a review of medical records. The study was approved by the ethics committee of Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai (protocol RJ-H-2015–0221).

Figure. Epidemiology of MRSA in Shanghai, 2005–2014. Of infectious Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained during 2005–2010, a random selection of 100 from each year were analyzed; of those obtained during 2001, 2012, and...

The percentage of methicillin resistance in the S. aureus infectious isolates was high, as is generally reported for China (13), and remained stable (at ≈70%) over the past 10 years (Table; Figure, panel A). In contrast, during the same time, resistance among CA–S. aureus infections rose considerably, from 21% to 43% (p = 0.0108, Fisher exact test). While the percentage of HA-MRSA infections slightly decreased and that of CA–methicillin-sensitive S. aureus infections remained stable, CA-MRSA infections increased significantly, from 2.4% (12/500 total S. aureus infections) during 2005–2010 to 7.4% (35/470) in 2014 (p = 0.0003, Fisher exact test) (Table; Figure, panel A). ST59 dominated among CA-MRSA infections; increasing relative frequency reached a level of 71.4% in 2014 (Table; Figure, panel A). This finding links the observed surge in the CA-MRSA infection rate nearly exclusively to the ST59 lineage.

Of the 56 ST59 CA-MRSA infections, most (34 [61%]) were skin and soft tissue infections (i.e., spontaneous pyogenic skin abscesses), but a considerable number were respiratory (10 [18%]) or blood (9 [16%]) infections. The percentage of invasive infections (as defined by isolation from an otherwise sterile site, such as primary skin and soft tissue infection, with subsequent isolation from the blood, lung, or other otherwise sterile body fluids) among ST59 CA-MRSA patients was high at 62.5% (35/56). Fatality rate was 14% (5/35) among patients with invasive infections. Multidrug resistance was frequent. In addition to being resistant to β-lactams, most of the recently (2014) isolated ST59 CA-MRSA was also resistant to erythromycin (23/25; 92%), clindamycin (23/25; 92%), gentamicin (2/25; 8%), levofloxacin (3/25; 12%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (4/25; 16%), fosfomycin (3/25; 12%), or rifampin (5/25; 20%). None was resistant to tetracycline, linezolid, or vancomycin.

The ST59 CA-MRSA isolates were genetically heterogeneous and belonged to 7 spa types, predominantly t437 (31/56; 55%), t216 (12/56; 21%), and t441 (6/56; 11%). This finding is in contrast to the scenario described for USA300 CA-MRSA isolates, which are closely related (14), and suggests independent acquisition of SCCmec elements by genetically divergent parental ST59 methicillin-sensitive S. aureus strains.

Of note, only 20 (36%) of the 56 ST59 CA-MRSA isolates that we obtained contained the lukSF genes encoding PVL (Figure, panel B), and presence of the PVL genes was not correlated with more severe (i.e., invasive) infection (Figure, panel C). The PVL-positive Taiwan clone (spa types t437/t441, lukSF+, SCCmec V) was responsible for only 20% of cases (Figure, panel D). Moreover, while the percentage of PVL-positive ST59 CA-MRSA isolates and those belonging to the Taiwan clone increased in 2012, probably because of dissemination of the Taiwan clone into China, those numbers recently declined, indicating that PVL and the Taiwan clone are not main driving forces explaining the increase and current high percentage of CA-MRSA infections in Shanghai (Figure, panel B). Also, these subsets were not correlated with a specific infection type (Figure, panels C,D). Last, the Taiwan clone was not more frequently involved with invasive infections than were other ST59 CA-MRSA isolates (Figure, panel D).

Conclusions

CA-MRSA infections caused by a non-USA300 clone increased significantly in a highly populated area in China. Whether our findings are representative of all of China and adjacent countries remains to be addressed. Our findings do not support the previously indicated correlation of the PVL-positive ST59 subset (Taiwan clone) with infection (11,12). Thus, our study provides epidemiologic evidence challenging the widespread notion about a significant role of PVL in CA-MRSA dissemination in the ST59 lineage and in general. Inasmuch as our findings underscore the idea that the development of CA-MRSA clones is less limited to specific genetic backgrounds than previously thought, they underscore that novel successful CA-MRSA clones will probably continue to emerge.

Dr. Li heads the Department of Laboratory Medicine at Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine. Her work focuses on pathogenesis and antibiotic resistance of staphylococci.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Intramural Research Program (grant ZIA AI000904 to M.O.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 81322025 and 81371875 to M. L.), the Shanghai Shuguang Talent Project (grant 12SG03 to M. L.), the Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology, China (grants 14140901000 and 15411960500 to M. L.), and the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 81421001 to M. L.).

References

1. Herold BC, Immergluck LC, Maranan MC, Lauderdale DS, Gaskin RE, Boyle-Vavra S, Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in children with no identified predisposing risk. JAMA. 1998;279:593–8.DOIPubMed
2. DeLeo FR, Otto M, Kreiswirth BN, Chambers HF. Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Lancet. 2010;375:1557–68.DOIPubMed
3. Otto M. Basis of virulence in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2010;64:143–62.DOIPubMed
4. Monecke S, Müller E, Buechler J, Rejman J, Stieber B, Akpaka PE, Rapid detection of Panton-Valentine leukocidin in Staphylococcus aureus cultures by use of a lateral flow assay based on monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:487–95.DOIPubMed
5. Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, ; EMERGEncy ID Net Study Group. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:666–74.DOIPubMed
6. Glaser P, Martins-Simões P, Villain A, Barbier M, Tristan A, Bouchier C, Demography and intercontinental spread of the USA300 community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineage. MBio. 2016;7:e02183–15. DOIPubMed
7. Tristan A, Bes M, Meugnier H, Lina G, Bozdogan B, Courvalin P, Global distribution of Panton-Valentine leukocidin—positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, 2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:594–600.DOIPubMed
8. Li M, Cheung GY, Hu J, Wang D, Joo HS, Deleo FR, Comparative analysis of virulence and toxin expression of global community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Infect Dis. 2010;202:1866–76.DOIPubMed
9. Mediavilla JR, Chen L, Mathema B, Kreiswirth BN. Global epidemiology of community-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). Curr Opin Microbiol. 2012;15:588–95.DOIPubMed
10. Chuang YY, Huang YC. Molecular epidemiology of community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Asia. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13:698–708.DOIPubMed
11. Chen CJ, Unger C, Hoffmann W, Lindsay JA, Huang YC, Götz F. Characterization and comparison of 2 distinct epidemic community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones of ST59 lineage. PLoS One. 2013;8:e63210.DOIPubMed
12. Vu BN, Jafari AJ, Aardema M, Tran HK, Nguyen DN, Dao TT, Population structure of colonizing and invasive Staphylococcus aureus strains in northern Vietnam. J Med Microbiol. 2016;•••: epub ahead of print .DOIPubMed
13. Xiao M, Wang H, Zhao Y, Mao LL, Brown M, Yu YS, National surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in China highlights a still-evolving epidemiology with 15 novel emerging multilocus sequence types. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:3638–44.DOIPubMed
14. Kennedy AD, Otto M, Braughton KR, Whitney AR, Chen L, Mathema B, Epidemic community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: recent clonal expansion and diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:1327–32.DOIPubMed

Figure

• Figure. Epidemiology of MRSA in Shanghai, 2005–2014. Of infectious Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained during 2005–2010, a random selection of 100 from each year were analyzed; of those obtained during 2001, 2012,...

Table

• Table. Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolated at Shanghai Renji Hospital, Shangai, China, 2005–2014

Suggested citation for this article: Li M, Wang Y, Zhu Y, Dai Y, Hong X, Liu Q, et al. Increased community-associated infections caused by Panton-Valentine leukocidin–negative MRSA, Shanghai, 2005–2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Oct [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2211.160587

DOI: 10.3201/eid2211.160587

1These authors were co–principal investigators.

2These authors contributed equally to this article.