A service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
National Institutes of Health
URL of this page: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/podcast/transcript081913.html
NLM Director’s Comments Transcript
U.S.’ Health Status Declines: 08/19/2013
Greetings from the National Library of Medicine and MedlinePlus.govRegards to all our listeners!
I'm Rob Logan, Ph.D. senior staff National Library of Medicine for Donald Lindberg, M.D, the Director of the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
Here is what's new this week in MedlinePlus.
A pioneering, comprehensive comparison of national health measures recently published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, suggests life expectancy improved within the U.S. from 1990-2010. Compared to developed nations, however, the U.S. declined in some key health areas during the two decades assessed in the study.
The findings (from a very large group of health researchers called the U.S. Burden of Disease Collaborators) report life expectancy for American adults increased from 75.2 years in 1990 to 78.2 years in 2010. A separate measure of healthy life expectancy (based on length of life and levels of illness at different ages) also increased for American adults -- from 65.8 in 1990 to 68.1 years in 2010.
The results (derived from the massive Global Burden of Disease study that compared 291 diseases and injuries and 67 risk factors or clusters of risk within 187 nations) additionally find the U.S.’ all-cause death rates at all ages improved during the study’s 20 year assessment period.
Conversely, compared to 34 developed nations (among the 187 surveyed), the U.S.’ ranking for age-standardized death rates fell from 18th to 27th (or close to last) place. Similarly, the U.S.’ comparative ranking of age-standardized years of life lost to premature mortality fell from 23rd to 28th (or close to last place). The U.S.’ comparative ranking of age-standardized number of years lived with a disability declined from 5th to 6th place. The U.S.’ comparative life expectancy at birth fell from 20th to 27th (or near last place) and the U.S.’ comparative ranking for healthy life expectancy dropped from 14th to 26th (or close to last place).
An editorial that accompanied the study (written by the President of the Institute of Medicine [IOM]) explains (and we quote): ‘… by every measure including death rates, life expectancy, and diminished function and quality of life as assessed by the (study’s) authors, the U.S. standing compared with 34 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries declined between 1990 and 2010’ (end of quote).
The IOM’s Dr. Harvey Fineberg praises the study’s groundbreaking efforts to detail the burden of disease in the U.S. (and other nations) and explains the study’s conceptual framework, organization, and methods represent what he calls (and we quote) a ‘monumental construction’ and… ‘a herculean task’ (end of quote).
Dr. Fineberg explains the study enables more meaningful comparisons of health measures between, among and within nations over time. He writes (and we quote): ‘it is scalable up and down – up to global regions and the world and down to states, counties, and municipalities’ (end of quote). In fact, some of the initial news reports about the study’s findings emphasized health status differences between U.S. regions instead of the results that compared the U.S. to 34 developed nations.
Dr. Fineberg especially commends the authors’ measures of health risk factors, which he explains will become more valuable as scientists overlap them with predictors of illness in the future. For example, Dr. Fineberg explains (and we quote) ‘genetic, metabolic, physiologic, behavioral, environmental, and social factors will be traced through defined pathways to disease and premature mortality’ (end of quote).
In terms of enhancing health prevention, the study’s hundreds of collaborators (from across the U.S) conclude their findings suggest (and we quote) ‘the best investments for improving population health would likely be public health programs and multisectoral action to address risks such as physical inactivity, diet, ambient particulate pollution, and alcohol and tobacco consumption’ (end of quote).
Overall, MedlinePlus.gov’s health statistics health topic page provides other gateways that assess the U.S.’ health status, such as the National Center for Health Statistics’ findings, which are found in the ‘overviews’ section.
A link to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s fast stats about American health can be found in the ‘start here’ section of MedlinePlus.gov’s health statistics health topic page.
MedlinePlus.gov’s health statistics health topic page also contains research summaries, which are available in the ‘research’ section. Links to the latest pertinent journal research articles are available in the ‘journal articles’ section. You can sign up to receive updates about health statistics as they become available on MedlinePlus.gov.
To find MedlinePlus.gov’s health statistics health topic page, type ‘health statistics’ in the search box on MedlinePlus.gov’s home page. Then, click on ‘health statistics (National Library of Medicine).’
The current study coupled with findings about the global economic impact of mental health (discussed in our last podcast) provide an unprecedented, compelling snapshot of health in the U.S. (and other nations) as well as new ways to interpret current challenges and assess future progress. Let’s hope the increased capacity to provide an overview of the nation’s and world’s health fosters renewed efforts to improve it.
Before I go, this reminder… MedlinePlus.gov is authoritative. It's free. We do not accept advertising …and is written to help you.
To find MedlinePlus.gov, just type in 'MedlinePlus.gov' in any web browser, such as Firefox, Safari, Netscape, Chrome or Explorer. To find Mobile MedlinePlus.gov, just type 'Mobile MedlinePlus' in the same web browsers.
We encourage you to use MedlinePlus and please recommend it to your friends. MedlinePlus is available in English and Spanish. Some medical information is available in 43 other languages.
Your comments about this or any of our podcasts are always welcome. We welcome suggestions about future topics too!
Please email Dr. Lindberg anytime at: NLMDirector@nlm.nih.gov
That's NLMDirector (one word) @nlm.nih.gov
A written transcript of recent podcasts is available by typing 'Director's comments' in the search box on MedlinePlus.gov's home page.
The National Library of Medicine is one of 27 institutes and centers within the National Institutes of Health. The National Institutes of Health is part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
A disclaimer — the information presented in this program should not replace the medical advice of your physician. You should not use this information to diagnose or treat any disease without first consulting with your physician or other health care provider.
It was nice to be with you. I look forward to meeting you here next week.
Original Investigation | August 14, 2013
The State of US Health, 1990-2010: Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors
[+ ] Author Affiliations
1Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington
2University of Washington, Seattle
3University of Texas School of Medicine, San Antonio
4Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
5Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
6Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
7Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
8Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
9Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
10Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
11Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
12Michigan State University, East Lansing
13National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
14Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
15National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
16National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
17National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Baltimore, Maryland
18Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
19Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
20Health Effects Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
21Loyola University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois
22University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
23University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
24Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
25Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
26Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
27MRC-HPA Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, England
28Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
29Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC
30University of California, San Francisco
31Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
32Columbia University, New York, New York
33New York University, New York, New York
34George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
35Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
36Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
37School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
38Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
39Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Evanston, Illinois
40Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
41China Medical Board, Boston, Massachusetts
42Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland
43Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
44Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
45California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento
46Dr Rivara is also Editor, JAMA Pediatrics
47Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland
48Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
49Mason Eye Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia
50Center for Disease Analysis, Louisville, Colorado
51University of California, Los Angeles
52Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
53University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park
54University of Alabama at Birmingham
55Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
56Department of Global Health Policy, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
57Queens Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
58National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Atlanta, Georgia
59Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
60Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
61Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
2University of Washington, Seattle
3University of Texas School of Medicine, San Antonio
4Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
5Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
6Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
7Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
8Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
9Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
10Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
11Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
12Michigan State University, East Lansing
13National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
14Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
15National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
16National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland
17National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Baltimore, Maryland
18Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
19Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
20Health Effects Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
21Loyola University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois
22University of California, San Diego, La Jolla
23University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
24Denver VA Medical Center, Denver, Colorado
25Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, New York
26Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
27MRC-HPA Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, England
28Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
29Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC
30University of California, San Francisco
31Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
32Columbia University, New York, New York
33New York University, New York, New York
34George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
35Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Florida
36Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
37School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
38Centro de Investigación en Sistemas de Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
39Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Evanston, Illinois
40Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
41China Medical Board, Boston, Massachusetts
42Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Calverton, Maryland
43Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
44Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
45California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento
46Dr Rivara is also Editor, JAMA Pediatrics
47Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland
48Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
49Mason Eye Institute, University of Missouri, Columbia
50Center for Disease Analysis, Louisville, Colorado
51University of California, Los Angeles
52Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
53University of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park
54University of Alabama at Birmingham
55Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts
56Department of Global Health Policy, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
57Queens Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii
58National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Atlanta, Georgia
59Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
60Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
61Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Published online
ABSTRACT
Importance Understanding the major health problems in the United States and how they are changing over time is critical for informing national health policy.
Objectives To measure the burden of diseases, injuries, and leading risk factors in the United States from 1990 to 2010 and to compare these measurements with those of the 34 countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries.
Design We used the systematic analysis of descriptive epidemiology of 291 diseases and injuries, 1160 sequelae of these diseases and injuries, and 67 risk factors or clusters of risk factors from 1990 to 2010 for 187 countries developed for the Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study to describe the health status of the United States and to compare US health outcomes with those of 34 OECD countries. Years of life lost due to premature mortality (YLLs) were computed by multiplying the number of deaths at each age by a reference life expectancy at that age. Years lived with disability (YLDs) were calculated by multiplying prevalence (based on systematic reviews) by the disability weight (based on population-based surveys) for each sequela; disability in this study refers to any short- or long-term loss of health. Disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) were estimated as the sum of YLDs and YLLs. Deaths and DALYs related to risk factors were based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of exposure data and relative risks for risk-outcome pairs. Healthy life expectancy (HALE) was used to summarize overall population health, accounting for both length of life and levels of ill health experienced at different ages.
Results US life expectancy for both sexes combined increased from 75.2 years in 1990 to 78.2 years in 2010; during the same period, HALE increased from 65.8 years to 68.1 years. The diseases and injuries with the largest number of YLLs in 2010 were ischemic heart disease, lung cancer, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and road injury. Age-standardized YLL rates increased for Alzheimer disease, drug use disorders, chronic kidney disease, kidney cancer, and falls. The diseases with the largest number of YLDs in 2010 were low back pain, major depressive disorder, other musculoskeletal disorders, neck pain, and anxiety disorders. As the US population has aged, YLDs have comprised a larger share of DALYs than have YLLs. The leading risk factors related to DALYs were dietary risks, tobacco smoking, high body mass index, high blood pressure, high fasting plasma glucose, physical inactivity, and alcohol use. Among 34 OECD countries between 1990 and 2010, the US rank for the age-standardized death rate changed from 18th to 27th, for the age-standardized YLL rate from 23rd to 28th, for the age-standardized YLD rate from 5th to 6th, for life expectancy at birth from 20th to 27th, and for HALE from 14th to 26th.
Conclusions and Relevance From 1990 to 2010, the United States made substantial progress in improving health. Life expectancy at birth and HALE increased, all-cause death rates at all ages decreased, and age-specific rates of years lived with disability remained stable. However, morbidity and chronic disability now account for nearly half of the US health burden, and improvements in population health in the United States have not kept pace with advances in population health in other wealthy nations.
Objectives To measure the burden of diseases, injuries, and leading risk factors in the United States from 1990 to 2010 and to compare these measurements with those of the 34 countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries.
Design We used the systematic analysis of descriptive epidemiology of 291 diseases and injuries, 1160 sequelae of these diseases and injuries, and 67 risk factors or clusters of risk factors from 1990 to 2010 for 187 countries developed for the Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study to describe the health status of the United States and to compare US health outcomes with those of 34 OECD countries. Years of life lost due to premature mortality (YLLs) were computed by multiplying the number of deaths at each age by a reference life expectancy at that age. Years lived with disability (YLDs) were calculated by multiplying prevalence (based on systematic reviews) by the disability weight (based on population-based surveys) for each sequela; disability in this study refers to any short- or long-term loss of health. Disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) were estimated as the sum of YLDs and YLLs. Deaths and DALYs related to risk factors were based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of exposure data and relative risks for risk-outcome pairs. Healthy life expectancy (HALE) was used to summarize overall population health, accounting for both length of life and levels of ill health experienced at different ages.
Results US life expectancy for both sexes combined increased from 75.2 years in 1990 to 78.2 years in 2010; during the same period, HALE increased from 65.8 years to 68.1 years. The diseases and injuries with the largest number of YLLs in 2010 were ischemic heart disease, lung cancer, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and road injury. Age-standardized YLL rates increased for Alzheimer disease, drug use disorders, chronic kidney disease, kidney cancer, and falls. The diseases with the largest number of YLDs in 2010 were low back pain, major depressive disorder, other musculoskeletal disorders, neck pain, and anxiety disorders. As the US population has aged, YLDs have comprised a larger share of DALYs than have YLLs. The leading risk factors related to DALYs were dietary risks, tobacco smoking, high body mass index, high blood pressure, high fasting plasma glucose, physical inactivity, and alcohol use. Among 34 OECD countries between 1990 and 2010, the US rank for the age-standardized death rate changed from 18th to 27th, for the age-standardized YLL rate from 23rd to 28th, for the age-standardized YLD rate from 5th to 6th, for life expectancy at birth from 20th to 27th, and for HALE from 14th to 26th.
Conclusions and Relevance From 1990 to 2010, the United States made substantial progress in improving health. Life expectancy at birth and HALE increased, all-cause death rates at all ages decreased, and age-specific rates of years lived with disability remained stable. However, morbidity and chronic disability now account for nearly half of the US health burden, and improvements in population health in the United States have not kept pace with advances in population health in other wealthy nations.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario