Cancer Epidemiol. 2013 May 14. pii: S1877-7821(13)00064-7. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2013.04.004. [Epub ahead of print]
Colonoscopic surveillance of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients in a faecal occult blood screening programme.
Sassoli de Bianchi P, Campari C, Mancini S, Giuliani O, Landi P, Paterlini L, Naldoni C, Finarelli AC, Falcini F, Ponz de Leon M, Sassatelli R, Borciani E, Fornari F, Gatti G, Zatelli M, Zurlini C, Rossi F, Corradini R, Olivetti R, Manfredi M, Baldazzi P, Nannini R, Zanarini S, Matarese VG, Palmonari C, Triossi O, Gordini S, Vattiato R, Colamartini A, Palazzi M, Severi M, Briganti L, Giovanardi M, Casale C, Bucchi L.
Source
Department of Health, Emilia-Romagna Region, 40127 Bologna, Italy.
Abstract
Background: In some Italian areas, colonoscopic surveillance of first-degree relatives (FDRs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients is provided as a part of local population-based faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening programmes. The objective of the present study was to assess the feasibility and early results of this surveillance model. Methods: Data from district screening centres were used to evaluate the process of identification and selection of eligible FDRs (residence in the Emilia-Romagna Region, age 40-75 years, no recent colonoscopy) of screen-detected CRC patients and the detected prevalence of disease. The probability for an FDR to undergo colonoscopy and to be diagnosed with CRC and advanced adenoma was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The sex- and age-standardised ratio of detected prevalence to that expected based on results from a colonoscopy screening study of the Italian general population was estimated. Results: Between 2005 and 2011, 9319 FDRs of 2437 screen-detected CRC patients (3.8 per patient) were identified and contacted. Their likelihood of being eligible for, and accepting, colonoscopy was 0.11 (95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.12). Among the 926 subjects undergoing colonoscopy, the prevalence of previous negative screening FOBT was 63%. Eleven CRCs (1.2%) and 100 advanced adenomas (10.8%) were detected. The standardised ratio of detected prevalence to that expected was 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.19-2.66) for CRC and 1.48 (1.04-2.05) for advanced adenoma. Conclusions: The procedure of selection of FDRs was extremely ineffective. Due to previous negative screening tests, the prevalence of disease was less than expected. A population-based FOBT screening programme is a highly unsuitable setting for the provision of surveillance to FDRs of CRC patients.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
- PMID:
- 23683843
- [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
.png)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario