),
in contrast to the situation for epidemic, or louse-borne, typhus caused by
R. prowazekii, which can produce severe disease and fatality rates up
to 30% if untreated. Serologic tests cannot distinguish these 2 infections,
however. We assume that the antibodies detected in Tanzania in this study were
caused by
R. typhi, because, to our knowledge, no severe or epidemic
illness compatible with louse-borne typhus has been described in the study
region.
Murine typhus is found throughout the world, widely distributed in
subtropical and tropical regions, and is most apparent in port cities with large
rat populations (
2,
4), which provide a reservoir for the pathogen and its
main vector, the rat flea (X
enopsylla cheopsis). Additional
transmission cycles have been described in Texas and California, USA, which
involved mainly suburban cats and opossums as reservoir hosts and the cat flea
(
Ctenocephalides felis) as vector (
5). Other yet unknown cycles may exist.
In Tanzania, information on typhus is sparse. A seroprevalence study among
pregnant women from the port city of Dar es Salaam found a seropositivity
prevalence of 28% (
4). In the landlocked
northern Tanzanian town of Moshi, murine typhus was detected in 0.5% of febrile
patients (
6).
A predictive risk model for endemic typhus based on environmental conditions
has not been established, but because plague is also transmitted by
X.
cheopsis fleas, some of the findings regarding plague transmission might
also apply to murine typhus. However, no data are available on the vector flea
C. felis, the predominant flea harvested from rodents in a study in
Uganda (
7).
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario